Mon, Aug 8, 2022 11:22 p.m.
The nsa is coming for you via google and facebook
"Nowhere to Run"
www.youtube.com
https://www.wnd.com/2021/07/nsa-confesses-unmasking-tucker-carlson/
Monday, August 08, 2022
The nsa is Coming for You, via google and facebook (music video)
By R.C.
Mon, Aug 8, 2022 11:22 p.m.
The nsa is coming for you via google and facebook
Martha Reeves and the Vandellas:
"Nowhere to Run"
www.youtube.com
https://www.wnd.com/2021/07/nsa-confesses-unmasking-tucker-carlson/
Mon, Aug 8, 2022 11:22 p.m.
The nsa is coming for you via google and facebook
"Nowhere to Run"
www.youtube.com
https://www.wnd.com/2021/07/nsa-confesses-unmasking-tucker-carlson/
 | The National Security Agency has confessed that it revealed Fox News host Tucker Carlson's name, found in conversations it was monitioring, by "unmasking" him, a process through which names are ... www.wnd.com |
He's a dolt.
It's not the NSA that is spying on him.
It is the Pentagon.
I know this because I am looking at the envelope I got from the NSA. The postmark shows 08/16/2013. The return address shows Department of Defense at the top left. The line below it shows National Security Agency. The third line shows Fort George G. Meade.
Why is the DOD engaging in domestic spying? Is this tantamount to "domestic extremism"?
Does the military run this country?
Paul Craig Roberts thinks so.
Gee, haven't I been pounding the table about this for a long, long time?
Gun owners of America, beware.
Uncle Sam knows everything about you already.
So, short of fleeing the country, you have nowhere to run and nowhere to hide.
Especially from drones and autonomous fighting machines. http://www.bostondynamics.com/robot_bigdog.html http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Boston+Dynamics&mid=595E871DAA7C6946071B595E871DAA7C6946071B&view=detail&FORM=VIRE1
Skynet is here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skynet_(Terminator)
From a letter I sent to many of you on 7/15/2011:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=322113
Who do you think funded the two founders while they were at Stanford?
DARPA.
And from a friend who sent the following to me in 2010!
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:29:16 -0600> From: johnp@copper.net
> To:
> Subject: Google to enlist NSA to help it ward off cyberattacks
>
>
> *Google to enlist NSA to help it ward off cyberattacks
>
> get rid of your gmail accounts.
>
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/03/AR2010020304057_pf.html
> *
>
> By Ellen Nakashima
> Thursday, February 4, 2010; A01
>
> The world's largest Internet search company and the world's most
> powerful electronic surveillance organization are teaming up in the name
> of cybersecurity.
>
> Under an agreement that is still being finalized, the National Security
> Agency would help Google analyze a major corporate espionage attack that
> the firm said originated in China and targeted its computer networks,
> according to cybersecurity experts familiar with the matter. The
> objective is to better defend Google -- and its users -- from future
> attack.
>
> Google and the NSA declined to comment on the partnership. But sources
> with knowledge of the arrangement, speaking on the condition of
> anonymity, said the alliance is being designed to allow the two
> organizations to share critical information without violating Google's
> policies or laws that protect the privacy of Americans' online
> communications. The sources said the deal does not mean the NSA will be
> viewing users' searches or e-mail accounts or that Google will be
> sharing proprietary data.
>
> The partnership strikes at the core of one of the most sensitive issues
> for the government and private industry in the evolving world of
> cybersecurity: how to balance privacy and national security interests.
> On Tuesday, Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair
> <http://www.whorunsgov.com/Profiles/Adm._Dennis_Blair> called the Google
> attacks, which the company acknowledged in January, a "wake-up call."
> Cyberspace cannot be protected, he said, without a "collaborative effort
> that incorporates both the U.S. private sector and our international
> partners."
>
> But achieving collaboration is not easy, in part because private
> companies do not trust the government to keep their secrets and in part
> because of concerns that collaboration can lead to continuous government
> monitoring of private communications. Privacy advocates, concerned about
> a repeat of the NSA's warrantless interception of Americans' phone calls
> and e-mails after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, say
> information-sharing must be limited and closely overseen.
>
> "The critical question is: At what level will the American public be
> comfortable with Google sharing information with NSA?" said Ellen
> McCarthy, president of the Intelligence and National Security Alliance,
> an organization of current and former intelligence and national security
> officials that seeks ways to foster greater sharing of information
> between government and industry.
>
> On Jan. 12, Google took the rare step of announcing publicly that its
> systems had been hacked in a series of intrusions beginning in December.
>
> The intrusions, industry experts said, targeted Google source code --
> the programming language underlying Google applications -- and extended
> to more than 30 other large tech, defense, energy, financial and media
> companies. The Gmail accounts of human rights activists in Europe, China
> and the United States were also compromised.
>
> So significant was the attack that Google threatened to shutter its
> business operation in China if the government did not agree to let the
> firm operate an uncensored search engine there. That issue is still
> unresolved.
>
> Google approached the NSA shortly after the attacks, sources said, but
> the deal is taking weeks to hammer out, reflecting the sensitivity of
> the partnership. Any agreement would mark the first time that Google has
> entered a formal information-sharing relationship with the NSA, sources
> said. In 2008, the firm stated that it had not cooperated with the NSA
> in its Terrorist Surveillance Program.
>
> Sources familiar with the new initiative said the focus is not figuring
> out who was behind the recent cyberattacks -- doing so is a nearly
> impossible task after the fact -- but building a better defense of
> Google's networks, or what its technicians call "information assurance."
>
> One senior defense official, while not confirming or denying any
> agreement the NSA might have with any firm, said: "If a company came to
> the table and asked for help, I would ask them . . . 'What do you know
> about what transpired in your system? What deficiencies do you think
> they took advantage of? Tell me a little bit about what it was they
> did.' " Sources said the NSA is reaching out to other government
> agencies that play key roles in the U.S. effort to defend cyberspace and
> might be able to help in the Google investigation.
>
> These agencies include the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security.
>
> Over the past decade, other Silicon Valley companies have quietly turned
> to the NSA for guidance in protecting their networks.
>
> "As a general matter," NSA spokeswoman Judi Emmel said, "as part of its
> information-assurance mission, NSA works with a broad range of
> commercial partners and research associates to ensure the availability
> of secure tailored solutions for Department of Defense and national
> security systems customers."
>
> Despite such precedent, Matthew Aid, an expert on the NSA, said Google's
> global reach makes it unique.
>
> "When you rise to the level of Google . . . you're looking at a company
> that has taken great pride in its independence," said Aid, author of
> "The Secret Sentry," a history of the NSA. "I'm a little uncomfortable
> with Google cooperating this closely with the nation's largest
> intelligence agency, even if it's strictly for defensive purposes."
>
> The pact would be aimed at allowing the NSA help Google understand
> whether it is putting in place the right defenses by evaluating
> vulnerabilities in hardware and software and to calibrate how
> sophisticated the adversary is. The agency's expertise is based in part
> on its analysis of cyber-"signatures" that have been documented in
> previous attacks and can be used to block future intrusions.
>
> The NSA would also be able to help the firm understand what methods are
> being used to penetrate its system, the sources said. Google, for its
> part, may share information on the types of malicious code seen in the
> attacks -- without disclosing proprietary data about what was taken,
> which would concern shareholders, sources said.
>
> Greg Nojeim, senior counsel for the Center for Democracy & Technology, a
> privacy advocacy group, said companies have statutory authority to share
> information with the government to protect their rights and property.
>
> Subject: Google to enlist NSA to help it ward off cyberattacks
>
>
> *Google to enlist NSA to help it ward off cyberattacks
>
> get rid of your gmail accounts.
>
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/03/AR2010020304057_pf.html
> *
>
> By Ellen Nakashima
> Thursday, February 4, 2010; A01
>
> The world's largest Internet search company and the world's most
> powerful electronic surveillance organization are teaming up in the name
> of cybersecurity.
>
> Under an agreement that is still being finalized, the National Security
> Agency would help Google analyze a major corporate espionage attack that
> the firm said originated in China and targeted its computer networks,
> according to cybersecurity experts familiar with the matter. The
> objective is to better defend Google -- and its users -- from future
> attack.
>
> Google and the NSA declined to comment on the partnership. But sources
> with knowledge of the arrangement, speaking on the condition of
> anonymity, said the alliance is being designed to allow the two
> organizations to share critical information without violating Google's
> policies or laws that protect the privacy of Americans' online
> communications. The sources said the deal does not mean the NSA will be
> viewing users' searches or e-mail accounts or that Google will be
> sharing proprietary data.
>
> The partnership strikes at the core of one of the most sensitive issues
> for the government and private industry in the evolving world of
> cybersecurity: how to balance privacy and national security interests.
> On Tuesday, Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair
> <http://www.whorunsgov.com/Profiles/Adm._Dennis_Blair> called the Google
> attacks, which the company acknowledged in January, a "wake-up call."
> Cyberspace cannot be protected, he said, without a "collaborative effort
> that incorporates both the U.S. private sector and our international
> partners."
>
> But achieving collaboration is not easy, in part because private
> companies do not trust the government to keep their secrets and in part
> because of concerns that collaboration can lead to continuous government
> monitoring of private communications. Privacy advocates, concerned about
> a repeat of the NSA's warrantless interception of Americans' phone calls
> and e-mails after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, say
> information-sharing must be limited and closely overseen.
>
> "The critical question is: At what level will the American public be
> comfortable with Google sharing information with NSA?" said Ellen
> McCarthy, president of the Intelligence and National Security Alliance,
> an organization of current and former intelligence and national security
> officials that seeks ways to foster greater sharing of information
> between government and industry.
>
> On Jan. 12, Google took the rare step of announcing publicly that its
> systems had been hacked in a series of intrusions beginning in December.
>
> The intrusions, industry experts said, targeted Google source code --
> the programming language underlying Google applications -- and extended
> to more than 30 other large tech, defense, energy, financial and media
> companies. The Gmail accounts of human rights activists in Europe, China
> and the United States were also compromised.
>
> So significant was the attack that Google threatened to shutter its
> business operation in China if the government did not agree to let the
> firm operate an uncensored search engine there. That issue is still
> unresolved.
>
> Google approached the NSA shortly after the attacks, sources said, but
> the deal is taking weeks to hammer out, reflecting the sensitivity of
> the partnership. Any agreement would mark the first time that Google has
> entered a formal information-sharing relationship with the NSA, sources
> said. In 2008, the firm stated that it had not cooperated with the NSA
> in its Terrorist Surveillance Program.
>
> Sources familiar with the new initiative said the focus is not figuring
> out who was behind the recent cyberattacks -- doing so is a nearly
> impossible task after the fact -- but building a better defense of
> Google's networks, or what its technicians call "information assurance."
>
> One senior defense official, while not confirming or denying any
> agreement the NSA might have with any firm, said: "If a company came to
> the table and asked for help, I would ask them . . . 'What do you know
> about what transpired in your system? What deficiencies do you think
> they took advantage of? Tell me a little bit about what it was they
> did.' " Sources said the NSA is reaching out to other government
> agencies that play key roles in the U.S. effort to defend cyberspace and
> might be able to help in the Google investigation.
>
> These agencies include the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security.
>
> Over the past decade, other Silicon Valley companies have quietly turned
> to the NSA for guidance in protecting their networks.
>
> "As a general matter," NSA spokeswoman Judi Emmel said, "as part of its
> information-assurance mission, NSA works with a broad range of
> commercial partners and research associates to ensure the availability
> of secure tailored solutions for Department of Defense and national
> security systems customers."
>
> Despite such precedent, Matthew Aid, an expert on the NSA, said Google's
> global reach makes it unique.
>
> "When you rise to the level of Google . . . you're looking at a company
> that has taken great pride in its independence," said Aid, author of
> "The Secret Sentry," a history of the NSA. "I'm a little uncomfortable
> with Google cooperating this closely with the nation's largest
> intelligence agency, even if it's strictly for defensive purposes."
>
> The pact would be aimed at allowing the NSA help Google understand
> whether it is putting in place the right defenses by evaluating
> vulnerabilities in hardware and software and to calibrate how
> sophisticated the adversary is. The agency's expertise is based in part
> on its analysis of cyber-"signatures" that have been documented in
> previous attacks and can be used to block future intrusions.
>
> The NSA would also be able to help the firm understand what methods are
> being used to penetrate its system, the sources said. Google, for its
> part, may share information on the types of malicious code seen in the
> attacks -- without disclosing proprietary data about what was taken,
> which would concern shareholders, sources said.
>
> Greg Nojeim, senior counsel for the Center for Democracy & Technology, a
> privacy advocacy group, said companies have statutory authority to share
> information with the government to protect their rights and property.
>
 | 05/15/09 - A Californi... vdare.com |
A Texas Reader Says The New Boss is The Same as the Old Boss
From:
Cleburne does not understand that there are zero differences between the current administration and the former ones.
For example, they all share a devotion to open borders, permanent war and ardently support NAFTA and free trade, massive expansions of the surveillance state, the welfare state and the warfare states.
If Cleburne needs more proof, he should ask himself why Michael Chertoff was the only US attorney to have not been replaced by the Clinton administration?
Finally, let's not forget Secretary of Defense Robert Gates. Gates is the fraud who, as president of Texas A&M University, was an ardent diversity supporter.
Chertoff is to Gates as George Bush is to President Barack Obama: a single, unbroken line of continuity connecting the proxies of the oligarchs and plutocrats who run this country.
There is no longer an Evil Party. There is no longer a Stupid Party. There is now only the Establishment.
By the way, I dedicate my letter and took my inspiration from rock and roll icons "The Who" and their classic song Won't Get Fooled Again. (Listen to it here.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment