Thursday, November 30, 2017

Criminal Invaders are Now Even Permitted to Commit Murder! Kate Steinle's Murderer Acquitted!


War crime victim Kate Steinle

By Nicholas Stix

According to American legal tradition, if you steal a gun, and “accidentally” shoot someone to death with it, it’s murder.

Likewise, according to American legal tradition, if you are feloniously present in America, and “accidentally” shoot someone to death, it’s murder.

But San Francisco, like much of America, is a jurisdiction under the rule of crime. And so, felonious, Mexican invader Jose Ines Garcia Zarate may murder with impunity.

And yet, were someone to do the right thing and execute Steinle’s murderer, whatever his real name is, I guarantee you that he’d be charged with and convicted of First Degree Murder.

Every juror who granted that Mexican scum the right to murder Kate Steinle is evil.

If Donald Trump and Jeff Sessions are serious men, they will arrest San Francisco’s mayor, sheriff, police chief and other leaders for feloniously aiding and abetting illegal aliens. If.

The Latest: Verdict shocks father of woman killed on pier
By Associated Press
November 30, 2017 at 9:01 p.m. CST

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The Latest [sic] on the trial of a Mexican man in a killing on a San Francisco pier (all times local):

6:20 p.m.

The father of a woman who was shot and killed on a San Francisco pier said he was shocked when a jury acquitted a Mexican immigrant [sic] accused of murder in the case.

Jim Steinle told the San Francisco Chronicle the family was saddened and shocked by Thursday's verdict.

He said, "justice was rendered but not served."

[It was neither rendered nor served.]

A jury found Jose Ines Garcia Zarate not guilty in the killing of Kate Steinle, who was strolling with her father on a crowded San Francisco pier when she was shot in 2015.

Garcia Zarate did not deny shooting Steinle and said it was an accident.

The Steinle family did not attend court to hear the verdict.

They spoke to the Chronicle in an exclusive interview that they said would be their last public comments.

Her father said the family has felt frustration and sadness but not anger or vindictiveness since the killing.

Even if Garcia Zarate had received a sentence of 100 years, the father said, "it doesn't solve anything, it doesn't help anything."
5:45 p.m.

U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions says he hopes local officials will "consider carefully the harm they are doing to their citizens" by not cooperating with federal immigration officials.

His comments come after a Mexican man was found not guilty Thursday of killing a woman on a San Francisco pier in a case that touched off a national immigration debate.

Sessions says San Francisco's "decision to protect criminal aliens led to the preventable and heartbreaking death" of Kate Steinle.

Jose Ines Garcia Zarate had been deported five times and was wanted for a sixth deportation when Kate Steinle was fatally shot in the back in 2015. Garcia Zarate said the shooting was an accident.

Under a sanctuary city law, the San Francisco sheriff's department had released Garcia Zarate from jail despite a federal immigration request to detain him for deportation
5:30 p.m.

A spokesman for the San Francisco district attorney says the acquittal of a Mexican man in a high-profile killing was not the verdict they had hoped for.

A jury on Thursday found Jose Ines Garcia Zarate not guilty on possible charges of first-degree murder, second-degree murder and involuntary manslaughter in the death of Kate Steinle on a popular pier.

Alex Bastian, a spokesman for the San Francisco prosecutor's office, said the "verdict that came in today was not the one we were hoping for" but it was the jury's decision and prosecutors would respect it.
Jurors did find Garcia Zarate guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm.

Public Defender Jeff Adachi said that charge carries a potential sentence of 16 months to 3 years.
5:10 p.m.

A defense lawyer for a Mexican man acquitted of murder in the shooting of woman in San Francisco directed a message to President Donald Trump, who had frequently cited the case during his campaign for tougher immigration policies.

Defense attorney Francisco Ugarte said Thursday the death of Kate Steinle was an "incomprehensible tragedy," but the ruling was a vindication for immigrants [sic].

Ugarte said the case was used "to foment hate" and used "to catapult a presidency along that philosophy of hate of others."

He said the immigration status of defendant Jose Ines Garcia Zarate had no relevance to the case and the verdict was a correct reflection of what transpired.

[Liar. It had everything to do with the case. If Kate Steinle’s murderer had not committed the felony of crossing the American border no fewer than five times, after being deported, each of which was a felony, Kate Steinle would still be alive. If Kate Steinle’s murderer had not stolen the murder weapon from a lawman’s car, Kate Steinle would still be alive. Finally, if Kate Steinle’s murderer had not murdered her, she’d still be alive.]

Garcia Zarate did not deny shooting Steinle in 2015 and said it was an accident.

He had been deported five times and was wanted for a sixth deportation when Steinle was fatally shot in the back in 2015.
4:35 p.m.
Jurors have found a Mexican man not guilty of murder in the killing of a woman on a San Francisco pier in a case that touched off a national immigration debate.

The jury reached the verdict Thursday in Kate Steinle's death.

Jose Ines Garcia Zarate had been deported five times and was wanted for a sixth deportation when Steinle was fatally shot in the back in 2015. Garcia Zarate didn't deny shooting Steinle and said it was an accident.

Before the shooting, the San Francisco sheriff's department had released him from jail despite a federal immigration request to detain him for deportation.

Its "sanctuary city" law limits cooperation with U.S. immigration authorities.

President Donald Trump cited the case during his campaign in a bid to show the country needed tougher immigration policies.
3:30 p.m.

A jury has reached a verdict in the trial of a Mexican man accused of killing a woman on a San Francisco pier in a case that touched off a national immigration debate.

Jurors alerted the judge Thursday that they had a verdict in the death of Kate Steinle. Word came hours after they asked to see the gun used in the shooting.

Jose Ines Garcia Zarate had been deported five times and was wanted for a sixth deportation when Steinle was fatally shot in the back in 2015. Garcia Zarate said the shooting was an accident.

Under a sanctuary city law, the San Francisco sheriff's department had released Garcia Zarate from jail despite a federal immigration request to detain him for deportation.

President Donald Trump frequently cited the case during his campaign.


The war criminal who goes by Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, now (courtesy of the treason media) Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, and many other noms de guerre

Finally, a Normal White Man Fights Back Against the Matriarchy!

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

Since the theater has announced that it refuses to every employ Rush again, based on the woman’s charge, the matter is actionable. Rush can sue both the theater and the woman. His lawyer can force the theater to give up the accuser. He could potentially put the theater out of business, and rightfully so.

Geoffrey Rush denies “inappropriate behavior” at theater
By Associated Press
November 30, 2017 at 9:04 p.m. CST

CANBERRA, Australia (AP) — The Sydney Theatre Company says it received a complaint of "inappropriate behavior" against Geoffrey Rush, an allegation lawyers for the Oscar winner denied.

The company was not disclosing details of the behavior alleged to have occurred while the 66-year-old Australian actor was an employee.
HWL Ebsworth Lawyers did not respond to a request for comment Friday, but had issued an earlier statement denying Rush was involved in any inappropriate behavior.

Australian media reports say the allegation dated from Rush's participation in the theater's production of William Shakespeare's "King Lear" from November 2015 to January 2016.

Sydney's The Daily Telegraph cited two unnamed theater sources in reporting Friday that an actress had accused Rush of touching her inappropriately. The sources told the newspaper the theater wouldn't work with Rush again.

Pat Buchanan: Why Roy Moore Matters

By Patrick J. Buchanan
Via Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation
November 26, 2017

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Why would Christian conservatives in good conscience go to the polls Dec. 12 and vote for Judge Roy Moore, despite the charges of sexual misconduct with teenagers leveled against him?

Answer: That Alabama Senate race could determine whether Roe v. Wade is overturned. The lives of millions of unborn may be the stakes.

Republicans now hold 52 Senate seats. If Democrats pick up the Alabama seat, they need only two more to recapture the Senate, and with it the power to kill any conservative court nominee, as they killed Robert Bork.

Today, the GOP, holding Congress and the White House, has a narrow path to capture the Third Branch, the Supreme Court, and to dominate the federal courts for a decade. For this historic opportunity, the party can thank two senators, one retired, the other still sitting.

The first is former Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada.

In 2013, Harry exercised the "nuclear option," abolishing the filibuster for President Obama's judicial nominees. The Senate no longer needed 60 votes to confirm judges. Fifty-one Senate votes could cut off debate, and confirm.

Iowa's Chuck Grassley warned Harry against stripping the minority of its filibuster power. Such a move may come back to bite you, he told Harry. Grassley is now judiciary committee chairman.
And this year a GOP Senate voted to use the nuclear option to shut down a filibuster of Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, who was then confirmed with 55 votes.

Yet the Democratic minority still had one card to play to block President Trump's nominees - the "blue slip courtesy."

If a senator from the state where a federal judicial nominee resides asks for a hold on proceedings, by not returning a blue slip, the judiciary committee has traditionally honored that request and not held hearings.

Sen. Al Franken of Minnesota used the blue slip to block the Trump nomination of David Stras of Minnesota to the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Franken calls Stras too ideological, too conservative.

But Grassley has now decided to reject the blue slip courtesy for appellate court judges, since their jurisdiction is not just over a single state like Minnesota, but over an entire region.

Thus have the skids been greased for a conservative recapture of the federal judiciary unseen since the early days of FDR.

Eighteen of the 179 seats on the U.S. appellate courts and 119 of the 677 seats on federal district courts are already open. More will be opening up. No president in decades has seen the opportunity Trump has to remake the federal judiciary.

Not only are the federal court vacancies almost unprecedented, a GOP Senate and Trump are working in harness to fill them before January 2019, when a new Congress is sworn in.

If Republicans blow this opportunity, it is unlikely to come again. For the Supreme Court has seemed within Republican grasp before, only to have it slip away because of presidential errors.

Nixon had four nominees to the Supreme Court confirmed and Gerald Ford saw his nominee, John Paul Stevens, unanimously confirmed. But of those five justices confirmed from 1969 to 1976, Stevens and Harry Blackmun joined the liberal bloc, and Chief Justice Warren Burger and Lewis Powell voted for Roe v. Wade.

Of Reagan's three Supreme Court nominees confirmed, Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony Kennedy cast crucial votes in 5-4 decisions to defeat the strict constructionists led by Antonin Scalia.

George H.W. Bush named Clarence Thomas to the court, but only after he had elevated David Souter, who also joined the liberal bloc.

Hence, both Trump, by whom he nominates, and a Republican Senate, with its power to confirm with 51 votes, are indispensable if we are to end judicial dictatorship in America.

And 2018 is the crucial year.

While Democrats, with 25 Senate seats at risk, would seem to be facing more certain losses than the GOP, with one-third as many seats at stake, history teaches that the first off-year election of Trump could prove a disaster.

Consider. Though Ike ended the Korean War in his first year, he lost both Houses of Congress in his second. Reagan enacted one of the great tax cuts in history in his first year, and then lost 26 seats in the House in his second.

Bill Clinton lost control of both the House and Senate in his first off-year election. Barack Obama in 2010 lost six Senate seats and 54 seats and control of the House. And both presidents were more popular than Trump is today.

If the election in Virginia this year is a harbinger of what is to come, GOP control of Congress could be washed away in a tidal wave in 2018.

Hence, this coming year may be a do-or-die year to recapture the Third Branch of Government for conservatism.

Which is why that Dec. 12 election in Alabama counts.

Black Supremacist Pseudo-Psychologist Joseph L. White Dead at 84; Associated Press Obit Celebrates His Intellectual Evil and Racism

Re-posted and Fisked by Nicholas Stix

“Father of Black Psychology” Joseph L. White Dies at 84
By Associated Press
November 29, 2017 at 10:52 p.m.

IRVINE, Calif. (AP) — Joseph L. White, a psychologist, social activist and teacher who helped pioneer the field of black psychology to counter what he saw as rampant ignorance and prejudice in the profession, has died. He was 84.

[There is no “field” of black psychology.]

White, who lived in Irvine, died of a heart attack on Nov. 21 near Chicago during a flight to St. Louis to see his daughter for Thanksgiving, said Tom Vasich, a spokesman for the University of California, Irvine, where White was a professor for decades.

White was born in Lincoln, Nebraska in 1932 but grew up in Minneapolis. He enrolled in San Francisco State College in 1950 after working his way west as a waiter on a passenger train.

He earned his Ph.D. from Michigan State in 1962, becoming one of only a handful of blacks in the nation to hold a doctorate in clinical psychology.

"When I left the program, I was what you call a black Anglo-Saxon. I was the nicest Negro you ever wanted to see" but prejudice changed him into "a militant Negro," he recalled.

[Liar. By the time he left the program, he was 29 years old. He’d been studying psychology for 12 years. But he would have us believe that he turned psychology on its head, due to suffering from “racist” whites?

Let’s stipulate that what he said was true. That would mean that intellect and study had nothing to do with his racist critique of “white” psychology.

Furthermore, if he was right that “white” psychology was wrong, it would mean that there is no such thing as psychology, but rather different psychologies for different groups. But since he had trashed the very idea of scientific objectivity, there was no psychology for any particular group either, because there was no objective metric for understanding claims of a “black psychology,” “woman’s psychology,” “homosexual psychology,” etc. There would merely be different political ideologues asserting different territorial claims with no basis but hatred and intimidation.]

With a wife and three children, he tried to find a home and an office in Long Beach, California but was repeatedly turned down despite having a college education and having performed military service.

In the midst of the civil rights and black power era of the 1960s, White campaigned for what is now known as cross-cultural psychology that took into account the perspectives and needs of ethnic minorities. In 1968, White — then dean of undergraduate studies at San Francisco State — and other black psychologists formed the Association of Black Psychologists.

They were angry at the way mainstream [read: “white”] psychology took what they considered a white Western worldview that ignored or misunderstood black culture and lifestyles. The field also was dominated by a prejudiced view of African-Americans.

[Department of Redundancy Department alert!: The anonymous AP operative who wrote this obit, probably years ago, said one thing about White, and then repeated it in different words, in order to try and make it seem as if he’d said two things: “a white Western worldview” and “a prejudiced view…” Instead of wasting 37 words on lies and redundancy, the operative should have simply written, “They hated whites.”]

"Psychology is part of America. Black people are invisible in America, they're invisible in psychology," [1] White said in an interview for the association's 2008 convention. "In America, black people are considered to be inferior, dumb, slow, childlike. Same thing in psychology, about (how blacks have) low IQ, can't do a complex task. We said: 'How the hell did this happen?'" [2]

[1. By 2008, we were on our way to having a “black” president. Thousands of blacks had been elected to political office. The only American with a national holiday was a black man. Blacks were so disproportionately represented on TV that opinion surveys showed that Americans thought the country was not 13%, but over 30% black. In TV (including commercials) and movies, blacks were almost always depicted as brilliant, righteous authority figures, scientific geniuses, etc., while white men were typically depicted as bumblers or devils. And blacks were powerful that prior to White’s stupid, lying interview, the NAACP succeeded at getting the Nielsen Corporation to falsify it’s ratings, in order to inflate black viewership. The NAACP was outraged that black viewership was not higher, as if blacks constituted much more than 13% of the population.]

2. In American popular culture, blacks depicted as morally and intellectually superior. In reality, they are on average much dumber (85 IQ for American blacks, and 67-70 for Haitian and Sub-Saharan black immigrants), commit 7-10 times as many crimes as whites, and have virtually no work ethic.]

White argued, for instance, that Eurocentric psychology misunderstood African-American spirituality, views of time and emphasis on collective behavior.

"Essentially, Joe was critiquing traditional psychology's arrogance in believing that it was the norm against which all people and their cultures should be measured and telling black people that 'you cannot seek validation from people who are oppressing you,'" said Thomas A. Parham, a past association president and vice chancellor of student affairs at UC Irvine.

[“People who are oppressing you”?! During the age of affirmative action?!]

White called for blacks to found a psychological field of their own. He popularized his ideas in a 1970 article in Ebony magazine and became known among colleagues as the "father of black psychology."

Gays, women and members of other ethnic minorities adopted the same approach for their communities, White said.

White also kept up a clinical practice for decades and also mentored many psychology students. [I.e., he spread his poison.] He also worked on educational projects to provide opportunities for minority students. In 1968, he helped found California's Educational Opportunity Program, which was expanded to all state college campuses and has provided financial aid, tutoring, counseling and other help to thousands of low-income [translation: dumb, unmotivated black] and educationally disadvantaged [another redundancy] students.

"Dr. White was a renowned scholar and will be remembered for his pioneering work in clinical psychology. But like all great professors his most enduring contribution is that he touched so many lives as a mentor and a teacher," family friend and former U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said in a statement.

[“Dr. White” was clearly a scholarly fraud, who did no “pioneering work,” and who twisted many lives with his anti-scientific racism.]

Support Your Local School-to-Prison Pipeline, the Last Line of Defense for Quality Public Education!

By Nicholas Stix

At Countenance—where else?

Fear and Foreboding, and the Kate Steinle Murder Trial (David in TN)

[Re: “Kate Steinle Murder Trial: Fifth Day of Deliberations, but No Verdict Yet.”]

By David in TN
Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 12:01:00 A.M. EST

I couldn't get a feel for this trial. It wasn't livestreamed, and the "reporters"? Well, forget it. Let's just say they make you miss Jamie Satterfield. [N.S.: !]

With the Jessica Chambers trial it was streamed, and you could tell what was going on. Not with this one for the Murder of the Woman on Pier 14.

They say "Never anticipate a jury." But I'm not optimistic.

Blair High Staff Finds Signs Saying “It’s Okay to be White” Outside School

By “W”

Bethesda Beat - Bethesda, MD

The horror!

At Bethesda Magazine.

Wednesday, November 29, 2017

Kate Steinle Murder Trial: Fifth Day of Deliberations, but No Verdict Yet

By David in TN
Wed, Nov 29, 2017 10:24 p.m.

At The Mercury News.

N.S.: This is starting to sound like the Jessica Chambers trial redux.

That open-and-shut case ended in a mistrial, though the rogue, black jury foreman repeatedly lied in open court, and asserted that the jury had acquitted the black defendant. The prosecutor said he’s going to retry the killer, er, defendant.

In the Kate Steinle case, the defendant confessed to killing her, and yet, here we are.

How does one describe the American criminal justice system? Dead? You can’t say it’s on life support, because there is no equivalent to life support in the criminal justice system. Everyone is doing his part to ensure the triumph of evil.

Black Serial Killer Suspect Arrested in Tampa


Suspected serial killer, Howell Emanuel Donaldson III

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

24-year-old man arrested in Tampa serial killings
By Associated Press
November 29, 2017 at 6:37 a.m. CST

TAMPA, Fla. (AP) — Police arrested a man late Tuesday and said they will charge him with murder in a string of killings that have terrorized a neighborhood of Tampa.

Tampa Police Chief Brian Dugan announced at a news conference that Howell Emanuel Donaldson, 24, would be charged with four counts of first degree murder.

Police detained Donaldson earlier Tuesday after a tip that he had a gun at a McDonald's restaurant.

Residents and police had been on edge since Oct. 9, when 22-year-old Benjamin Mitchell was shot to death. Two days later, 32-year-old Monica Hoffa, was slain. And on Oct. 19, Anthony Naiboa, 20, was killed after taking the wrong bus home from his new job. On Nov. 14, 60-year-old Ronald Felton was killed.

All of the October victims were either getting on or off a city bus, or were at a bus stop when they were shot, police said.

Dugan said the department had received more than 5,000 tips. He thanked those who called in the tip that led to Donaldson's arrest. No further information was provided about Donaldson.

Who Will Matt Lauer’s Permanent Replacement be? Will It be Yet Another Racial Quota Hire?


Craig Melvin

By Grand Rapids Anonymous
Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 8:16:00 A.M. EST

Matt Lauer Fired!

I woke up early today, flipped on the CBS morning show and saw that Charlie Rose's replacement was a black named Vladimir. This gave the show two blacks and one white as cohosts--equaling ABC's Good Morning Black America for the same quota (Roberts, Strahan, and Stephanopoulos).

I flipped on my tablet and thought, "How is NBC holding on to two whites on Today?" Two seconds later, "Breaking News" pops up on my tablet--Matt Lauer fired for sexual harassment. The odds are 100% that a blackie will replace Lauer. Think Craig Melvin.

The tabloids had pointed out Lauer was a serial cheater for years.

So I gave the Today show a couple minutes of my time to view Savannah and Hoda Kotb (who it turns out IS a black host already).

So after blackie Melvin is coronated (I believe) to take Lauer's job, ALL THREE NETWORKS will have two blacks and one white cohosting their morning shows.

Why?! To push the agenda. Any other reason for this kind of quota being forced on the white majority viewing audience—has escaped me.

Feminazi Inquisition Bags Yet Another Head of a Powerful, Normal White Man, as NBC’s Andy Lack Immediately Fires Today Show Host Matt Lauer after 20-Year Tenure, Following First Complaint by Female Subordinate; Lack Replaces Lauer with Mulatto Homosexual


Matt Lauer

By Nicholas Stix

Matt Lauer’s Today Show colleagues Savannah Guthrie and Hoda Kotb fought back tears, as they announced his firing this morning, but at the same time read off the company line, whereby the workplace must be “safe for women, er, everyone.”

The as yet unnamed female subordinate made her move on Monday night, and NBC’s Andy Lack apparently immediately made the decision to fire Lauer. The Boss says that Lauer wasn’t on the show yesterday, and although Lack claims the matter was thoroughly investigated, he acted before there was any time for a thorough investigation.

Lack claims Lauer was fired for "inappropriate sexual behavior." The real reason Lauer was fired was lawsuit insurance.

The feminist subordinate who bagged Lauer would have gone to a feminist lawyer first (Lisa Bloom?), and saw millions of dollars dancing before her eyes.

Once the feminist subordinate/assassin and her lawyer showed up with paper work, Lack’s first call would have been to NBC’s corporate lawyer, whose first call would have been to NBC’s crisis management company.

The crisis management company would have told NBC’s lawyer something like, ‘Every day that you fail to get out in front of this, the tab goes up at least $1 million more.’

Lack immediately thought, ‘Matt’s gotta go.’

Lack said in a corporate statement that he had reason to believe that this wasn’t the first complaint.

According to a story that just appeared at Reuters,

There were reports journalists at multiple outlets had been investigating complaints against Lauer.

Elizabeth Wagmeister and Ramin Setoodeh, two Variety reporters, said they had been reporting a story about sexual harassment allegations by multiple women against Lauer for months. "NBC was aware that Variety was working on a bombshell story about sexual harassment allegations against Matt Lauer," Setoodeh wrote on Twitter.

Spokeswomen for the New York Times, whose earlier reporting on Bill O'Reilly and Harvey Weinstein helped unleash the recent wave of allegations against powerful men, did not immediately respond to questions about a CNN report that the Times had been investigating misconduct by Lauer. [“NBC News Fires ‘Today’ Co-Host Matt Lauer for Sexual Misconduct,” reporting by Gina Cherelus and Jonathan Allen; additional reporting by Susan Heavey in Washington; editing by Alden Bentley, Howard Goller and Nick Zieminski, Reuters, Nov. 29, 2017, at 7:20 a.m.]
How would all those reporters have heard about the accusations against Lauer? Simple—the lawyer that organized the posse was working the phones.

Democrat Party hatchet woman Lisa Bloom (Gloria Allred’s daughter) organized the campaigns against Roger Ailes and Bill O’Reilly at Fox News, and the dragon lady herself, Gloria Allred, organized the campaign against Judge Roy Moore.

The whole process is lousy with conflicts of interest.

WATE 6 On Your Side
[And whose side might that be?]

NBC News fires Matt Lauer over inappropriate sexual behavior
By Associated Press
November 29, 2017 at 7:32 a.m. EST

NEW YORK (AP) — NBC News says longtime "Today" show host Matt Lauer has been fired for "inappropriate sexual behavior."

Lauer's co-anchor Savannah Guthrie made the announcement at the top of Wednesday's "Today" show.

Guthrie read a statement from NBC News chairman Andy Lack, stating that the company has received a detailed complaint from a colleague Monday night "about inappropriate sexual behavior in the workplace" by Lauer. Lack's statement said the company found that after a serious review of the complaint it represented "a clear violation" of the company's standards, and Lauer was terminated as a result.

Lack added in his statement that it was the first complaint about Lauer in more than 20 years at NBC, but "we were also presented with reason to believe this may not have been an isolated incident."

The move comes a week after CBS News fired morning anchor Charlie Rose amid reports of sexual misconduct.

Tuesday, November 28, 2017

Genocidal Anti-Semites Attack Israel, and Seek to Destroy Her

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

“Jewish human rights groups.”

Anytime I see the phrase “human rights groups,” Jewish or otherwise, I reach for my gun with one hand, and my wallet with the other. That’s because the phrase has become a political code for racial socialists.

They’re protecting 40,000 African grifters. But it’s not about 40,000. With these mopes, it never is.

Their mission is to simultaneously get rich, while committing genocide against every Western country.

“Israel’s failure to follow the Jewish imperative to protect and care for the gerim—the landless sojourners who seek refuge among us—is a far greater threat to the Jewish character of the state than is the community of African migrants and asylum seekers who have escaped forced military service, torture and crimes against humanity in Eritrea and Sudan and sought safe haven in Israel,” Rabbi Michael Lezak, co-chairman of T’ruah, a human rights group, told Newsweek.”
I’m no Torah scholar or Talmudist but you don’t have to be to know that Judaism is not a suicide pact.

“Rabbi” Michael Lezak is yet another of the legions of Marxist sophists. Lezak’s little game is to set up a logic in which, whatever the Jewish state does, it must perish. If it defends itself from invasion by gentiles, and Moslem blacks at that, it somehow morally perish. If it embraces them, it will be physically annihilated.

And why is “forced military service” a horror? “Torture and crimes against humanity”? Please do tell. And why did he forget to play the mass rape card? “Rabbi” Lezak isn’t even trying very hard.

And what is it with these “Eritreans”? Until 1993, they were all Ethiopians. But for years, they demanded independence from Ethiopia in their own county, Eritrea. But as soon as they got their own country, they sought to trade up for Western saps, and fled.

And why would any civilized country want Sudanese?

“Rabbi” Lezak doesn’t discuss any of this. He’s used to crybullying people with sanctimony.

HIAS once cared about Jews, but has clearly gone over to the dark side.
“A Jewish humanitarian nonprofit organization that provides assistance to refugees.”

As Ann Coulter wrote in Adios, America, 95% of “refugees” are frauds, and the other 5% just haven’t been caught yet.

“Humanitarian” is another one of those masks that sanctimonious evildoers wear.

Amnestying the first 40,000 grifters would lead to them sending for jihad wives, and then each having 6-12 kids. So, now you’ve got about 400,000 stone aged black African Jihadi bums, sucking the Jews of Israel dry. What do you do then? Demand that the Jews take in another 100,000 African jihadis (plus wives plus eight kids each).

The sub-Saharan black Africans would join with the Arab Moslem Israelis to run the Jews into the sea.

The problem isn’t innumeracy; the problem is genocidal evil.

The “humanitarians” denounce Bibi Netanyahu not in spite of his patriotism, but because of it.

Jewish Groups Denounce Israel’s Plans to Deport 40,000 African Asylum Seekers
By Carlos Ballesteros
11/24/17 at 10:42 A.M.

Jewish human rights groups are denouncing Israel’s plans to deport almost 40,000 African asylum seekers, defending refugees whom Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu calls “infiltrators.”

On Sunday, Netanyahu’s 28-member executive cabinet voted unanimously to close the Holot detention center and give African asylum seekers three months to leave the country or face deportation to an undisclosed country. If they refuse to go, they will be imprisoned indefinitely. The proposal will now be considered by the Israeli legislature, where it is expected to pass.

“The infiltrators will have the option to be imprisoned or leave the country,” Israel’s Ministry of Public Security said in a statement. Officials also said that the mass deportations are meant “to protect the Jewish and democratic character” of Israel.

But opponents reject the deportations as a violation of Israel’s founding principles.

“Israel’s failure to follow the Jewish imperative to protect and care for the gerim—the landless sojourners who seek refuge among us—is a far greater threat to the Jewish character of the state than is the community of African migrants and asylum seekers who have escaped forced military service, torture and crimes against humanity in Eritrea and Sudan and sought safe haven in Israel,” Rabbi Michael Lezak, co-chairman of T’ruah, a human rights group, told Newsweek.

African asylum seekers, mostly from Eritrea, take part in a protest against Israel’s deportation policy in front of the Israeli Knesset in Jerusalem, on January 26. On Sunday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s 28-member executive cabinet voted unanimously to close Israel’s Holot detention center and give African asylum seekers three months to leave the country or face deportation to an undisclosed country.

The Israeli government says that there are 38,043 African migrants living in the country, most of them hailing from war-torn countries such as Eritrea and South Sudan, having illegally crossed the Israeli border between 2007 and 2012.

Some Israelis argue that African asylum seekers have worsened living conditions in Tel Aviv and other communities in southern Israel.

“This is the right policy to ease the suffering of residents in South Tel Aviv and other neighborhoods where the infiltrators reside,” Interior Minister Aryeh Deri, who initiated the deportation proposal, said on Sunday, according to Voice of America. “My duty is to return peace and quiet to South Tel Aviv and many neighborhoods across the country.”

Netanyahu has even promised that he will “return South Tel Aviv to the citizens of Israel,” claiming that the African migrants “are not refugees, but infiltrators looking for work.”

But human rights advocates say the migrants deserve a fair hearing.

“Without that, they should not be removed, regardless of what the situation is in Tel Aviv,” Melanie Nezer, senior vice president for public affairs at HIAS, a Jewish humanitarian nonprofit organization that provides assistance to refugees, told Newsweek.

Nezer argued that as a signatory to the U.N.’s 1951 Refugee Convention, Israel is both legally and morally obligated to protect refugees and other persons in need of international protection.

“The Refugee Convention came about after the Holocaust because the international community wanted to make sure that something like it never happened again,” Nezer said. “As the first signatory to the convention, Israel has a responsibility to uphold its standards.”

Nezer also noted that Israel should remember its own history, as the nation was founded as a refuge for Jews who had escaped the horrors of World War II and built on the premise “Never again.”

“Israel needs to do right by these African asylum seekers,” she said.

The U.N. High Council for Human Rights (UNHCR) has also criticized the move, saying that Israel should be more forthright and transparent about its relocation plans.

“Due to the secrecy surrounding this policy and the lack of transparency concerning its implementation, it has been very difficult for UNHCR to follow up and systematically monitor the situation of people relocated to these African countries,” the organization said in a statement. “UNHCR, however, is concerned that these persons have not found adequate safety or a durable solution to their plight and that many have subsequently attempted dangerous onward movements within Africa or to Europe.”

Furthermore, Israel has restricted the freedom of asylum seekers through a series of policies aimed at encouraging self-departure, a UNHCR official said on Sunday, according to Al-Jazeera.

Teklit Michael, 29, an asylum seeker from Eritrea, works in the kitchen of a restaurant in Tel Aviv, Israel, on June 25, 2017.

Critics say that Israel’s acceptance rate of asylum seekers from these nations is considerably lower than that of most developed countries; according to the United Nations High Commission for Human Rights, Israel has recognized only eight Eritrean and two Sudanese asylum seekers as refugees since 2009. And, according to Al-Jazeera, “Two hundred Sudanese refugees from the Darfur region were also granted humanitarian status.”

Israel reportedly has agreements with Rwanda and Uganda to take in the asylum seekers that Israel wants to deport and that Israel pays up to $5,000 for each deportee taken in by the third parties.

Israel and its partner governments say that it plans to give asylum seekers the basic necessities to start their new lives in a new country.

But a 2014 investigation by Haaretz found that asylum seekers who “voluntarily departed” Israel for Rwanda “arrived in the country with no status, no permits and no path to livelihood.” Furthermore, “some were directed from Rwanda to Uganda with no warning and no infrastructure in place.”

The Sunday vote comes after an Israeli High Court upheld the country’s controversial practice of deporting undocumented migrants to an unnamed third country without their consent in August.

As noted by The Times of Israel, deportations to a third country are rare in the Western world. Only two other countries—Italy and Australia—have attempted to deport migrants and asylum seekers to third countries, but local courts in both countries shot down the move because it was found to be in violation of the 1951 Refugee Convention.

Rattlesnake-Bites-Man Story from Kansas

By Nicholas Stix

I don’t know why the MSM publish such stories. Now a man-bites-rattlesnake story—that’s a reptile of a different color!


Kurt Russell: Two Conversations about the Second Amendment

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

Russell had these conversations shortly after the release of Quentin Tarantino’s The Hateful Eight (2015), in which Russell performed.

At one point, Russell refers to “Quentin.”

It seems that Tarantino has for years promoted the confiscation of guns from ordinary, law-abiding citizens.

Russell was scheduled to promote the picture in the second conversation, but interviewer Jeffery Wells tried to rope him into a debate about the Second Amendment.

Wells has no lack of enemies, but I have to acknowledge that he has been eminently fair to me over the years.

Trans PonderNews
Published on Dec 24, 2015

This video contains two separate videos where Kurt Russell talk about gun control. The first is the view, where Kurt talks about the 2nd Amendment and why we have always needed to protect ourselves from tyrannical governments- as shown in history. The second interview is for a printed article by Jeffery Wells- Kurt Russell Walks Off this second Interview because he realizes Jeff has a clear agenda and Kurt takes no bait- and lays it all out.

Racist, Black MSNBC Host Joy Reid Has Done It Again! She Called Rural Whites “the core threat to our democracy”


Joy Reid

By Jerry PDX
Monday, November 27, 2017 at 11:06:00 P.M. EST

Black MSNBC host Joy Reid publicly posts this comment on Twitter:

"This is the core threat to our democracy. The rural minority -- the people @JYSexton just wrote a long thread about -- have and will continue to have disproportionate power over the urban majority."

At Fox News.

Fox News has broken the story and is, at this moment, the only major outlet to cover it. I expect others to follow suit because it now can't be ignored, as much as they'd like to. However, the article on Fox News does not state directly what Mrs. Reid is implying. What she really means is to put "white majority" before rural minority and "black, or non-white" before urban majority. Of course, the urban population is not majority non-white but that doesn't change the racist intent of what she is trying to express. The Fox News headline is pretty direct, though it ignores the racist subtext, by calling her comment stunningly ignorant and arrogant.

Kudos to Fox for giving the story front page mention and not censoring comments, at this point over 1,000 and counting.

N.S.: Considering that we don’t have a democracy, it would be impossible for rural whites or any other group to be “core threat to it. However, groups like blacks, Hispanics, and Moslems are certainly core threats to our republican form of government.

Monday, November 27, 2017

All Quiet in D.C. Superior Court


“Police in riot gear contain a group of protesters at the corner of 12th and L Streets NW on the day of the inauguration of Donald Trump as president of the United States in Friday, Jan. 20, 2017.”

[See also: “To Defend America—Will Inauguration Day AntiFa Rioters Get ‘Exemplary Sentencing’?”; and

“J20 Trials Finally Underway—AntiFa Defendants Already Condemned Out of Own Mouths.”]

By Nicholas Stix

Those of you who read my two reports on the first set of felony trials for defendants charged with riot and related felonies for their actions during President Trump’s Inauguration on January 20 may have been worndring what happened to the follow-ups.

When jury selection began on November 15, Judge Lynn Leibovitz announced that the trial would last about a month.

When I attended Knoxville Horror killer George Thomas’ retrial in Knoxville in 2013, although it was a complicated trial with many charges, and Thomas had two of the top trial lawyers in the state, Steven Johnson and ….. Knox County judge Walter Kurtz wrapped things up (not including jury selection) in five days, including the verdict and sentencing hearing.

I figured that Judge Leibovitz would wrap up jury selection in one day, leaving Thursday and Friday for beginning the trial. No such luck. She extended jury selection to Thursday, and went fishin’ on Friday. The good judge only began the trial proper on Monday with opening arguments, and devoted Tuesday to videotapes from CCTV systems and the testimony of witnesses who had been trapped, terrified, in businesses whose plate glass windows the rioters had smashed.

Then, on Wednesday… Judge Leibovitz hung up her “Gone fishin’” sign again.

What was it President Kennedy said of our nation’s capitol? “Washington is a city of Southern efficiency and Northern charm.”

Meanwhile, Washington Post operative Paul Duggan had copy to fill over the weekend, so he did his part for the defense.

For six demonstrators who joined hundreds of others in Washington for an Inauguration Day protest that turned chaotic and destructive, their trial in D.C. Superior Court, set to resume Monday, seems to hinge on an issue of perception:

Did the blocks-long march and related mayhem in downtown Washington amount to a riot? Or was it a lawful, free-speech assembly in which a relatively small number of participants committed vandalism, including smashing windows and spray-painting a government vehicle?
[Were Inauguration Day protesters rioting or lawfully demonstrating? That’s the question for jurors. By Paul Duggan, Washington Post, November 25, 2017.]

Duggan neglected to mention the arson, assaults on policemen, the relevant local statute, and his newspaper’s having quoted the plans for violence from the riot conspiracy site, a site whose plans all of the defendants followed. That’s why they all dressed identically, Black Bloc-style, and why the prosecution said it has video of the defendants removing their masks, and changing their clothes.

Various supporters of the rioters were on hand in the comments section, to lie about both the facts and the law, fabricating all sorts of non-existent conditions that just happen to get their allies off.

1 day ago

“David M--If I just happen to be handing [sic] with a group of guys and one shoots and robs a store clerk, and we all jump in the car and drive away, I am an accomplice, or at the very least and [sic] accessory after the fact.

“The folks that joined in, whether or not they smashed the windows or just cheered on the vandals, are equally accessories to the crime.”

1 day ago

“These folks were engaging in a lawful assembly in the first place. That others decided to commit crimes while these people were lawfully protesting is NOT their fault, nor responsibility.

“It's as if you walked into that convenience store to buy a Slurpee, and then someone robbed it, and the police charged you with ‘accessory to robbery’ merely because you were present. You were under no obligation to leave, and neither were the protesters.”
I responded,

Complain to the strawman in the mirror.

“These folks were engaging in a lawful assembly in the first place.”

Nope. They had conspired to riot, whether by breaking windows, committing arson, assaulting policemen, or acting as human shields or walking strawmen with their violent accomplices, so that police wouldn’t know who it was that had committed the violence.

Because the defendants didn’t just happen to be in the vicinity, but accompanied the attackers after the attacks, Mandog’s example is germane, while yours is phony.

Guilty as hell.

1 day ago

“Just to be extra clear here:

“I'm absolutely, 100% allowed to scream ‘Smash the State! Down with XXX! Bankrupt all YYY Supporters!’

“I'm even allowed to scream ‘Burn it all! Rape the Women and Children!’

“I'm NOT allowed to say ‘Hurt THAT YYY Supporter! Smash the Store Over There! Rape THOSE people!’

“Incitement in the Constitutional exception to Free Speech consists only of direct, distinct, targeted and IMMEDIATE threats.

“And *you* have to be the one saying it. Merely being part of a mob which is chanting something illegal isn't criminal - YOU have to have been chanting too.

“The current DC Incitement statue is patently unconstitutional.”
I responded,

"I'm even allowed to scream 'Burn it all! Rape the Women and Children!'"

No, you're not. That's classic incitement to riot, arson, etc.

And "Merely being part of a mob..." is a common jailbird's fantasy. If you're part of a mob that commits a crime, you're guilty. Every schoolboy learns that in school.

Are you liar, er, lawyer? You lie about the law like one.

And Communists, who believe in collective responsibility towards their enemies, sudenly become radical individualists:

1 day ago
“Thats not how laws are enforced. There is no group punishment, only individuals. Go back to russia if you want that.”
Of course there is group punishment, if one acted as part of a criminal conspiracy. Otherwise, we couldn’t have laws against conspiracies.

Note that justbenice is in fact a Communist/Anarchist, so she/he/it (s/h/it, for short) is just an exercise in confusion.

1 day ago
“Political violence is exactly what the Klan engaged in. Political violence against black people. Antifa riots are nothing more than political violence against the country.

1 day ago
“So you support the Klan.”

1 day ago
“In the new era of Trump hate, throwing feces and urine on racists was called peaceful protest by the news media in their rewrite about Charlottesville. So, I can see why they think lighting vehicles on fire was peaceful.”

1 day ago
“In the new era of 'trump hate', racist bigots look to the president for support and receive it. You are one of them.”

1 week ago
“They have to have actual evidence connection you to the violence. Simply that you were in the vicinity is not good enough.”

6 days ago
Emails, conspiring with others in advance are more than enough evidence. You don't have to have engaged in violence on "J20."

John Gotti didn't lay a finger on any of the 18 people, for whose murders he was convicted.

1 day ago
“They also showed up to beat on the racists in Charlottesville and the media called these antifa thugs peaceful protesters. Last time I checked, throwing feces and urine, even on the most despicable, is not peaceful. Americans were served up a serious helping of journalistic malfeasance that day. Luckily for the media's narrative, one of the little Nazis rammed his car down a crowded street a while after the riot was broken up. Including Field's heinous murderous terrorist act as part of some riot is fallacious at best, and politically motivated at worst. As we have seen with the media coverage afterwards, it was politically motivated.”
The defendants were in the general vicinity as human shields, as part of the conspiracy, dressed identically to the rioters, down to the masks, to make it impossible to distinguish between "protesters" and rioters. And that makes the "protesters" just as guilty as the rioters.

If the prosecution told the truth about the incriminating video, then all of the defendants conspired to riot, and they either acted as human shields and walking diversion tactics, in order to protect the active rioters and/or confuse police, or they were simply active rioters.

But as far as they’re concerned, the laws don’t apply to them.

And Paul Duggan and his editors clearly agree. Hence Duggan’s oversights, and the choice by his editors to run a photograph of scary looking cops, rather than of frightening rioters.

Fortunately, WaPo commenter bklyn38st directed readers to “DC Code 22-1322, Rioting or inciting to riot.”

§ 22–1322. Rioting or inciting to riot.

(a) A riot in the District of Columbia is a public disturbance involving an assemblage of 5 or more persons which by tumultuous and violent conduct or the threat thereof creates grave danger of damage or injury to property or persons.

(b) Whoever willfully engages in a riot in the District of Columbia shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 180 days or a fine of not more than the amount set forth in § 22-3571.01, or both.

(c) Whoever willfully incites or urges other persons to engage in a riot shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 180 days or a fine of not more than the amount set forth in § 22-3571.01, or both.

(d) If in the course and as a result of a riot a person suffers serious bodily harm or there is property damage in excess of $5,000, every person who willfully incited or urged others to engage in the riot shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 10 years or a fine of not more than the amount set forth in § 22-3571.01, or both.

Hopefully, by the time you read these words, Judge Leibovitz will have deigned to turn around the sign, slam down her gavel, and announce, “Court is in session.”

Considering that of the current crop of six reprobates, er, defendants enjoying the presumption of innocence, each has a lawyer—don’t six lawyers in one courtroom for the defense alone violate the fire code?—and Judge Leibovitz has the next Inauguration riot trial scheduled for December 11, I may be writing updates on this case past the 2021 inauguration.

Sunday, November 26, 2017

Rex Tillerson’s State Department, Who Some Allege is Once Again an Extension of the Deep State, Has Earmarked $700,000 for an Advertising Campaign that is Reportedly Intended to Defeat Conservative Leader and Current Prime Minister Viktor Orban….

By Reader-Researcher RC

At The Free Thought Project.

A Carthaginian Peace: The Only Proper End to the Antiversity’s War on Civilization

By Nicholas Stix

As proposed by my VDARE colleague, John Derbyshire.

Detroit Justice: An Off-Duty Wayne County Sheriff's Deputy Shot and Killed an Armed Man When He Broke into Her Home

By Reader-Researcher RC
Sun, Nov 26, 2017 2:50 p.m.

At The Detroit News.

Meet Taiyesha Baker, the Nurse Working at Riley Children's Health, an Affiliate of Indiana University Health in Indianapolis, Who Wants to Murder All White Baby Boys



By Reader-Researcher RC

“Every son you had should be sacrificed to the wolves.”

Indiana Nurse Under Investigation for Tweets about Killing White Babies (PJ Media).


N.S.: By the way, as GAB and PJMedia’s Megan Fox show, while Twitter immediately blocks anyone accused of being “racist” (i.e., for criticizing affirmative action groups), genocidally anti-white racists are rarely blocked. Taiyesha Baker appears to have deleted her own account, once people began publicizing her twits.

On February 23rd or 27th, I was permablocked by Twitter on obviously ideological grounds, though the Politburo claimed it was because my twits sounded like I was a bot. Yeah, right.

In late March or early April, Facebook also permablocked me.

Twitter’s Jack Dorsey and Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg are two of the biggest racists in America. But they have lots of company.

In case someone should assert that Taiyesha Baker is an extraordinary case, she’s only extraordinary in that she said what she thought, not that she thought it.

Saturday, November 25, 2017

Four Armed “Teens” Jump Marine from Behind: I Got ‘em Right Where I Want Them!

By A Texas Reader

They said the homeowner spun around, knocked the suspect's handgun away, pulled out his own gun and shot the teen robber several times.


A London Lawyer Tries to Beat a Speeding Ticket in Ireland (Humor)

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix
With apologies to the original comic

A London Lawyer is Driving

A London lawyer runs a stop sign and gets pulled over by an Irish cop. He thinks that he is smarter than the cop because he is a lawyer from London, and is certain that he has a better education than any Irish cop. He decides to prove this to himself, and have some fun at the Irish cop’s expense.

Irish cop says, “License and registration, please.”

London lawyer says, "What for?"

Irish cop says, "Ye didnae come to a complete stop at the stop sign."

London lawyer says, "I slowed down, and no one was coming."

Irish cop says, "Ye still didnae come to a complete stop. License and registration, please."

London lawyer says, "What's the difference?"

Irish cop says, "The difference is, ye havte come to complete stop, that's the law. License and registration, please!"

London lawyer says, "If you can show me the legal difference between slow down and stop, I'll give you my license and registration and you give me the ticket. If not, you let me go and don't give me the ticket."

Irish cop says, "Sounds fair. Exit your vehicle, sir."

The London lawyer exits his vehicle.

The Irish cop takes out his baton and starts beating the living daylights out of the lawyer and says, "Daeye want me to stop, or just slow down?"

The TCM Film Noir of the Week for Sunday, November 26, at 10 a.m. ET is Alfred Hitchcock’s Classic Thriller, Strangers on a Train (1951)



By David in TN
Saturday, November 25, 2017 at 12:32:00 A.M. EST


The TCM Film Noir of the Week for Sunday, November 26, at 10 a.m. ET is Strangers on a Train (1951). Alfred Hitchcock was the director. Robert Walker and Farley Granger star as, respectively, a psychopath and a tennis player who meet on a train and talk about murdering someone they don't like. In other words, "swap murders."

Granger's character thinks it wasn't serious. Walker's does, and he promptly murders Granger's estranged (pregnant by another man) wife, with whom Granger had been seen in public having a violent argument.


Leo G. Carroll, Ruth Roman, and Robert Walker

Granger’s character was hoping to marry Ruth Roman, daughter of a U.S. Senator. He hoped it could be a springboard for a political career of his own.

Hitchcock makes Granger look like a selfish, unsympathetic character, with poor judgement. Not unusual for Hitchcock. In other films he tries to make the audience almost root for a killer.


Strangers on a Train has a spectacular climax on a wild merry-go-round. Walker, who makes a convincing psycho, died at age 32, shortly after the film's release.



Friday, November 24, 2017

Today’s America: 13-Year-Old, Female Car Thief Kills 17-Year-Old Mother of Toddler While Fleeing Police


Murder victim Aubrey Jolene Nothum, 17, and her toddler son. I guess that means she was 15 when she got knocked up. No word on any of the children’s fathers.

At The Daily Mail.

FAIRFIELD, TEXAS - Authorities say shots have been fired after a suspect in the shooting death of a Texas state trooper on Thanksgiving Day was spotted in Waller County

By A Texas Reader


Baltimore Homicide Detective Killed a Day before He was Slated to Testify against Fellow Cops in Federal Case


Baltimore City Homicide Det. Sean Suiter, 43

By Prince George’s County Ex-Pat

At Yahoo News.

Baltimore (City) is truly a big-time, diverse city. Not only do street thugs routinely murder witnesses, to keep them from testifying, but cops now do it, too! The city jail has also been thug-run for years.

It’s Not Letting It Go! Associated Press Continues to Support Racist, Black NFL Thugs, and to Mock President Trump

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

Trump complains players are the boss in the NFL

By Brittney Baird
November 24, 2017 at 7:33 a.m. [8:33 a.m. ET]

PALM BEACH, Fla. (AP) — He’s not letting it go.

President Donald Trump is continuing to rail against football players who kneel during the National Anthem to protest racism and police brutality.

[They are not "protest[ing] racism and police brutality," they're protesting police doing their job. Brittney Baird should have written, "alleged racism and police brutality." That she refused to write "alleged," was her way of editorializing, in support of the racist, black thugs, and against the President. Her lede, "He’s not letting it go," was also an expression of loyalty to the racist thugs. Trump is continuing to criticize the racist, black thugs, for the obvious reason that they refuse to stop politicizing NFL games in support of racist, black cop-killers and would-be cop-killers.]

Trump asks his followers in a Black Friday tweet: “Can you believe that the disrespect for our Country, our Flag, our Anthem continues without penalty to the players.”

He’s accusing NFL commissioner Roger Goodell of having “lost control” of what he called a “hemorrhaging league” where “Players are the boss!”
Trump’s tweet was in response to one from his social media chief, Dan Scavino.

Scavino had shared a Breitbart News story about New York Giants player Olivier Vernon taking the knee during the anthem on Thanksgiving ahead of a game against the Redskins.

The website is run by Trump’s former chief strategist.

Texas Immigration News: Missing “Grand Prairie” Woman Found Unharmed Following Report of Abduction


Kidnapping victim Madai Cazares, 23

By A Texas Reader

What would Fred Reed think?


Missing Grand Prairie woman found unharmed following report of abduction

The search for a Grand Prairie woman came to an end Thanksgiving evening after she and her estranged boyfriend were found unharmed….

Cazares recently ended a relationship with Jose Eduardo Reyes, who authorities said kidnapped his ex Tuesday. The victim's mother, Maria Cazares, said their relationship was sometimes violent and that her daughter was trying …

N.S.: First of all, she’s not a Grand Prairie woman. Mexican, more likely.

If you hit the link, and watch the video, you’ll learn that neither Madai Cazares’ pretty mother, Maria Cazares, nor either of her two children speaks a word of English. Madai and Maria are almost certainly illegal aliens, with the two bastards Madai had with Jose Eduardo Reyes illegal anchor babies.

Thus, we see five illegal aliens costing White American citizen net taxpayers millions of dollars, and creating a battalion of additional Democrat voters, welfare cases, and criminals.


Kidnapping victim Madai Cazares and suspect Jose Eduardo Reyes

Former President of the Berkeley College Republicans at UC Berkeley is Suing a Prominent Member of an Antifa Group for Allegedly Threatening and Harassing Him and Others on Campus



By Reader-Researcher RC

UC Berkeley conservative student sues Antifa member over threats, harassment

The former president of the Berkeley College Republicans at the University of California, Berkeley announced Wednesday he is suing a prominent member of Antifa on the ...

BAMN - Wikipedia

Origins. BAMN was formed in 1995 to oppose the July 20, 1995 decision by Regents of the University of California to ban affirmative action. In 1997, BAMN expanded to ...

At Berkeleyside.


Thursday, November 23, 2017

Domestic Terror Attack on 92-Year-Old White Woman in Alabama


War crime victim Mary Lou Gedel
By Pax Romana58
Monday, November 20, 2017 at 4:27:00 P.M. EST

Alabama Judge “Stunned by Brutality” in [Black] Killing of 92-Year-Old [White] Woman
By Travis Fedschun
November 20, 2017
Fox News

An Alabama judge said last week he was “stunned by the brutality” seen in the murder of a 92-year-old woman who was beaten to death inside her home.

In a preliminary hearing on Friday when the suspect in the murder of Mary Lou Gedel appeared in court, Montgomery Police Detective G. Naquin testified Rodney McQueen's DNA was found throughout her home, WSFA reported.

Naquin said the 92-year-old was found two weeks ago sitting in a chair on with “massive” facial and head injuries, after she was beaten with a tall brass lamp.

“The lamp was caved in on all sides and had been ripped from the wall in the living room,” he told the court.

The assault was so intense, Naquin testified fragments from the broken beer bottles and plastic wrappers were embedded in Gedel’s skull, according to WSFA. Montgomery District Judge Troy Massey said at the hearing he was “stunned by the brutality” after hearing the details.

Officials said they were able to match McQueen to the crime scene after taking DNA samples from a busted window. His profile was already in a database after serving time for a prior crime with the with [sic] the [sic] Alabama Department of Corrections, according to WSFA.”

Also at The Montgomery Advertiser.

And The News Center.

War crime suspect Rodney McQueen

Here’s Some Good, Present-Day Thanksgiving News: Mayflower II Restoration is on Budget and on Schedule for 2020!


“In this Nov. 3, 2017 photo, shipwrights Jamie Kirschner, left, and Tucker Yaro clean out the hold of the Mayflower II at Mystic Seaport’s H.B. duPont Preservation Shipyard in Mystic, Conn. Restoration of the ship, a replica of the vessel that brought Pilgrims to Massachusetts in 1620, is expected to be completed in 2019 when it will return to its home port in Plymouth, Mass. (Sean D. Elliot/The Day via AP) “

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

Smooth sailing so far on $7.5M makeover of Pilgrim ship
By L. Castle
November 23, 2017 at 5:06 a.m. EST

PLYMOUTH, Mass. (AP) — If you’re a fan of the Mayflower II, here’s something that will float your boat.
A year after craftsmen embarked on an ambitious effort to restore the rotting replica of the ship that carried the Pilgrims to the New World in 1620, the work “is going really great,” project manager Whit Perry says.

Britain built the vessel and sailed it to the U.S. as a gift of friendship in 1957. Usually it’s moored in Plymouth Harbor, where more than 25 million people have boarded it over the past six decades. But over the years, the elements, aquatic organisms and insects took their toll.

It’s now in dry dock at the Henry B. duPont Preservation Shipyard at Connecticut’s Mystic Seaport, getting a $7.5 million makeover in time for 2020 festivities marking the 400th anniversary of the Pilgrim landing.

The Associated Press caught up with Perry, director of maritime preservation and operations at Plimoth Plantation , for a progress report.
AP: You’re 12 months into a 2½-year project involving major structural repairs to America’s most beloved boat. Any unpleasant surprises?

Perry: Not really. I couldn’t be more pleased with the progress we’re making right now. We’ve had some major milestones since we began on Nov. 3, 2016. We have more than 100 new frames and floor timbers inside in the hold. Now we’re actually going to start the planking process on the outside of the ship, which is very exciting.
AP: So nothing’s bugging you? This time last year, on top of water damage and dry rot, you had beetles chewing through the bottom of the boat.

Perry: Ah, yes, the wharf borer beetle. No, that’s been a minor issue. We did find evidence of (Teredo worms). This is a mollusk that can grow up to three feet long and eats through wood. On the bottom of the keel, there’s something called a “worm shoe” — a 4-inch-thick piece of wood that runs the whole length of the ship. It lets the worms have a field day but not get into the main structure of the boat. That’s where we found evidence of worms. The ship itself is OK.
AP: The shipyard’s live webcam is pretty cool, but it’s hard to tell how many people are involved and what they’re doing. Can you tell us what we can’t see?

Perry: There are 20 people working on the Mayflower II at any one time. They’re working regular shifts, but we’re paying a little overtime so they don’t feel like they have to put down their tools if they’re in the middle of something. There are small teams working all over the ship. As we take things apart, we’re fixing anything with a question mark now, while we have the chance.
AP: Sea water actually preserves a wooden ship like this one. What happens when it’s on dry land for so long? Is that bad for a boat?

Perry: It can be. We’re very proactive in spraying the boat with salt water and an antifungal agent. As we put the ship back together, we try to keep the humidity up with misters so it doesn’t dry out too much. We also have to leave a little play on the new planking beneath the waterline so it doesn’t buckle when the ship returns to the water and the wood starts to swell. It’s not an exact science.
AP: In 2020, the eyes of the world will be on Plymouth. Sounds like you’re confident the ship will be ready?

Perry: It’s all going really great. We’re on budget and we’re on schedule. The ship will leave Mystic Seaport by late spring or early summer of 2019. And I’ve got to say, sailing the Mayflower II back to Plymouth is going to be quite a spectacle. Seeing the ship back under sail is going to be a beautiful sight.

Slave Revolt Inflicts Still More Casualties! ESPN Forced to Slash $80 Million in Salary Costs, as NFL Ratings Slump Worsens

By Reader-Researcher RC

NFL Ratings Slump Worsens as ESPN Forced to Slash $80 Million in Salary Costs

“ESPN is dealing with three simple math problems. They have fewer subscribers than they planned for. They have higher costs than they planned for. They lower ratings than they hoped for.”

At Zero Hedge.

N.S.: I guess the MSM will just have to curse normal white men even more than they have been—but how could they curse them any more?

Actually, ESPN has one problem: Diversity. Diversity means paying more for inferior labor, while cheating superior labor (refusing to hire it, firing it, and underpaying it). Diversity means insulting one’s main customer base, which means that one can charge advertisers less, out of loyalty to economic parasites.

“America's First Socialist Republic”: A Thanksgiving Day Meditation

By An Old Friend
Thu, Nov 23, 2017 1:54 p.m.

One of my correspondents observed the same phenomenon that's described below in a study of the dynamics of Hutterite communities in Montana. Or, rather, those dynamics are engineered to remedy the phenomenon.

PowerLine Blog

Paul A. Rahe holds the Charles O. Lee and Louise K. Lee Chair in the Western Heritage at Hillsdale College and has established himself as one of the country’s most distinguished scholars of history and politics. In view of his study of Republics Ancient and Modern, Professor Rahe is the academy’s foremost authority on the history of republics. Although his more recent work on Soft Despotism was not far from his Thanksgiving reflections when he wrote this column for us in 2009, neither was his older work on republics. Professor Rahe wrote this column at the dawn of the Obama era. It bears directly on the socialist temptation that confronts us yet:

On Thanksgiving, it is customary that Americans recall to mind the experience of the Pilgrim Fathers. We have much to learn from the history of the Plymouth Plantation. For, in their first year in the New World, the Pilgrims conducted an experiment in social engineering akin to what is now contemplated; and, after an abortive attempt at cultivating the land in common, their leaders reflected on the results in a manner that Americans today should find instructive.

William Bradford, Governor of the Plymouth Colony, reports that, at that time, he and his advisers considered “how they might raise as much corn as they could, and obtain a better crop than they had done, that they might not still thus languish in misery.” And “after much debate of things,” he then adds, they chose to abandon communal property, deciding that “they should set corn every man for his own particular” and assign “to every family a parcel of land, according to the proportion of their number, for that end.”

The results, he tells us, were gratifying in the extreme, “for it made all hands very industrious” and “much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been.” Even “the women now went willingly into the field, and took their little ones with them to set corn; which before would allege weakness and inability; whom to have compelled would have been thought great tyranny and oppression.”

Moreover, he observes, “the experience that was had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years . . . amongst godly and sober men, may well evince the vanity of that conceit of Plato’s and other ancients applauded by some of later times . . . that the taking away of property and bringing in community into a commonwealth would make them happy and flourishing.” In practice, America’s first socialist experiment “was found to breed much confusion and discontent and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort.”

In practice, “the young men, that were most able and fit for labor and service, did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men’s wives and children without any recompense. The strong, or man of parts, had no more in division of victuals and clothes than he that was weak and not able to do a quarter the other could; this was thought injustice. The aged and graver men to be ranked and equalized in labors and victuals, clothes etc., with the meaner and younger sort, thought it some indignity and disrespect unto them. And for men’s wives to be commanded to do service for other men, as dressing their meat, washing their clothes, etc., they deemed it a kind of slavery, neither could many husbands well brook it.”

Naturally enough, quarrels ensued. “If it did not cut off those relations that God hath set amongst men,” Bradford notes, “yet it did at least much diminish and take off the mutual respects that should be preserved amongst them. And [it] would have been worse if they had been men of another condition” less given to the fear of God. “Let none object,” he concludes, that “this is men’s corruption, and nothing to the course itself. I answer, seeing all men have this corruption in them, God in His wisdom saw another course fitter for them.”

The moral is perfectly clear. Self-interest cannot be expunged. Where there is private property and its possession and acquisition are protected and treated with respect, self-interest and jealousy can be deployed against laziness and the desire for that which is not one’s own, and there tends to be plenty as a consequence.

But where one takes from those who join talent with industry to provide for those lacking either or both, where the fruits of one man’s labor are appropriated to benefit another who is less productive, self-interest reinforces laziness, jealousy engenders covetousness, and these combine in a bitter stew to produce both conflict and dearth.