Monday, September 30, 2019

Hey .. Let's Bring More Mexicans into the U.S.

By "W"
Mon, Sep 30, 2019 2:13 p.m.

Hey .. let's Bring More Mexicans into the U.S.

Subject: Hey .. let's Bring More Mexicans into the U.S.
Wanted Mexican cartel boss is behind one-third of drugs in the US

Slain NYPD Cop Brian Mulkeen Remembered as Local Hero

By "W"
Mon, Sep 30, 2019 2:04 p.m.

Slain NYPD cop Brian Mulkeen remembered as local hero

Racist, Black Murderer of White Cop Antonio Lavance Williams' Life of Crime

By "W"
Mon, Sep 30, 2019 2:03 p.m.

Bronx Cop Shooting Perp Antonio Lavance Williams' Life of Crime

Queering the New Year: Over 250,000 Revelers Flood Tel Aviv to Diddle Judaism in the Doo-Dah, for Israel's Biggest ever Gay Pride Parade

By "W"
Mon, Sep 30, 2019 1:09 p.m.

"Over 250,000 revelers flood Tel Aviv for Israel's biggest ever Gay Pride parade" | The Times of Israel

A long weekend of sore butts and STDs. What's not to celebrate?

PC Kills: As Part of the Transgender Hoax, Puberty-Blocking Drugs Used on "Trans Kids" Have Killed More than 6,000 People

By "W"
Mon, Sep 30, 2019 1:34 p.m.

Puberty blocking drugs used on "trans kids" have killed more than 6,000 people

NYC Repeals First Amendment, Bill of Rights, Imposes Ban on Saying "Illegal Alien"

By "W"
Mon, Sep 30, 2019 1:32 p.m.

NYC now has a ban on saying "illegal alien"

It's the Circus! The Ninth Circus! TOMORROW: ACLU in Federal Appeals Court Arguing for Multi-Million Stealth Amnesty

By "W"
Mon, Sep 30, 2019 1:03 p.m.

TOMORROW: ACLU in Federal Appeals Court for Arguments in Forced Return to Mexico and Asylum Ban Lawsuits

From: ACLU Media []
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 11:12 AM
Subject: TOMORROW: ACLU in Federal Appeals Court for Arguments in Forced Return to Mexico and Asylum Ban Lawsuits
TOMORROW: ACLU in Federal Appeals Court for Arguments in Forced Return to Mexico and Asylum Ban Lawsuits
CONTACT: Inga Sarda-Sorensen, 212-284-7347,
The American Civil Liberties Union will be in federal appeals court in San Francisco on Tuesday, October 1, for arguments in two separate challenges to Trump administration anti-immigrant policies.
Both cases are being heard on the same day by the same Ninth Circuit panel in a session that begins at 9 a.m. PT/noon ETLivestream details:
U.S. Circuit Judges Ferdinand Fernandez, William Fletcher, and Richard Paez will preside. The location is the James R. Browning U.S. Courthouse, Courtroom 1, 3rd Floor (Room 338), 95 7th St., San Francisco.
The cases are:
  • Innovation Law Lab v. McAleenan (Forced Return to Mexico)
    This case challenges the Trump administration's policy forcing asylum-seekers to return to Mexico and remain there indefinitely while their asylum applications are processed in the United States.

    U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg issued a 
    preliminary injunction in April 2019. In May, a Ninth Circuit panel granted the administration's request to temporarily allow the policy to take effect as the government appeals the preliminary injunction. So far, some 45,000 asylum-seekers have been stranded in Mexico under the policy.

    ACLU attorney Judy Rabinovitz will argue the appeal.

    The ACLU, Southern Poverty Law Center, and Center for Gender & Refugee Studies brought the case on behalf of 11 individual asylum-seekers forcibly returned to Mexico and organizational plaintiffs Innovation Law Lab, the Central American Resource Center of Northern California, Centro Legal de la Raza, the University of San Francisco School of Law Immigration and Deportation Defense Clinic, Al Otro Lado, and the Tahirih Justice Center.
  • East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump (Asylum Ban I)
    This case challenges the asylum ban announced in a presidential proclamation and Department of Homeland Security regulation on November 9, 2018. The ban would restrict asylum applications to ports of entry.

    U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar issued a 
    preliminary injunction in December 2018 that remains in effect. The court is considering the government's appeal of that ruling.

    ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt will argue the appeal.

    The lawsuit was filed by the ACLU, Southern Poverty Law Center, and Center for Constitutional Rights on behalf of East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, Al Otro Lado, Innovation Law Lab, and the Central American Resource Center in Los Angeles.

The Neo-Nazi Behind the Reparations Movement

Excerpted by Nicholas Stix

Slavery Reparations Movement “Founder” Hated Jews, Loved Neo-Nazis
by David Cole
September 24, 2019
Taki’s Mag

“America was born of sin.” So goes the broken-record preachifyin’ of the racial evangelists of the left. And that sin is (drum roll) racism. Just Google “racist origin of,” “racist roots of,” or “racist history of,” and you’ll get page after page of search results in which leftists teach you the racist beginnings of, well, everything: the Second Amendment, juries, minimum wage, circus clowns, tipping at a restaurant, the phrases “tipping point,” “peanut gallery,” and “long time no see,” table manners, breakfast, the SATs, psychology, hospitality, diets, banking, the suburbs, cartoons, math, Wonder Bread, the prom, and even religion.

Last month, The New York Times went all-in on born of sin, declaring that every single thing about the U.S. is a direct result of slavery. Take sugar, for example. Your affection for candy bars is racist. Sure, today’s sugar is not the product of slavery. But because it used to be a really long time ago, the mark of (sugar) Cain has forever branded your malted balls. Even your sweet tooth is racist, the Times reasons, because if not for the slaves behind the initial mass production of sugar in the Americas, we might be perfectly content today sucking on lemons and eating a flavorless mush called rootmarm.

Be not fooled; there is method (or just meth) to the Times’ madness. With most of the Democrat presidential candidates going gaga over slavery reparations, the purpose of the NYT piece is to prime the rest of us to accept reparations as just and necessary. The formula is simple: Slavery “made” us, so therefore we owe penance because everything we have is built upon a foundation of racist evil.

I love a good irony, and here’s a doozy: The reparations movement itself is built upon a foundation of racist evil. Quite literally, from the creation of the formal reparations movement in the mid–20th century through the early 2000s when influential Democrats began to openly embrace the idea, there’s a through-line of racial hatred, courtesy of the man who is credited with putting the entire matter on the map…and on the Democrats’ agenda….

[Read the whole thing here.]

More Racial Profiling Pseudo-Science

By Nicholas Stix
October 29, 2008

Tenured antiversity activists who scream “racism!” at the drop of a pair of handcuffs can produce new “studies” “proving” that police are racially profiling blacks in their sleep. Their formula is to take the percentages of police stops/searches/arrests of blacks, and show that they exceed the percentage of blacks officially residing in the jurisdiction in question. Ta-da! And the numbers will always work, for the simple reason that blacks commit crimes vastly disproportionate to their percentage of virtually any jurisdiction’s population.

Legitimate social science would compare police stops, etc., not to the general population, but to the population of criminal suspects. But Leftwing activists refuse to compare those numbers, or even to speak of blacks as committing more crimes as opposed to being“arrested” more often than other groups - as if cops routinely got descriptions of an attacker as “a pasty-faced white guy,” and instead radioed in,“The suspect is a black male.”

Such “studies,” which make a mockery of social science, share the assumptions of Disparate Impact Theory, which is at the heart of all multicultural pseudo-science.

According to Disparate Impact Theory “researchers”

  • if blacks do better than whites in a given index, it is either non-essential, or proof of black superiority
  • Any index in which blacks do worse than whites is, ipso facto, proof of white racism; and
  • Since only a racist would question the research, the researchers needn’t waste their breath responding to critics.

Racial profiling fiction also assumes that hordes of white criminals wreak havoc with impunity, while racist police focus all of their energies on terrorizing innocent black and Hispanic males.

A logically consistent application of “disparate impact” would require abolishing all laws.

The Southern California ACLU paid Ian Ayres to concoct a report showing that the LAPD racially profiles innocent blacks; Ayres was happy to oblige them. (Law student Jonathan Borowsky appears to have done the work.) Ayres [Email him] is “William K. Townsend Professor” at Yale Law School. Among his mala fides, he’s a plagiarist, which has not harmed his career, and indeed qualifies him to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Abstract: We find prima facie evidence that African Americans and Hispanics are over-stopped, over-frisked, over-searched, and over-arrested.

The findings of racial disparity are supported by ancillary analyses of investigative outcomes and officer race. We find that frisks and searches are systematically less productive when conducted on blacks and Hispanics than when conducted on whites.

It is implausible that higher frisk and search rates are justified by higher minority criminality, when these frisks and searches are substantially less likely to uncover weapons, drugs or other types of contraband. We also find that the black arrest disparity was 9 percentage points lower when the stopping officer was black than when the stopping officer was not black. Similarly, the Hispanic arrest disparity was 7 percentage points lower when the stopping officer was Hispanic than when the stopping officer was a non-Hispanic white. [A Study of Racially Disparate Outcomes in the Los Angeles Police Department, by Ian Ayres and Jonathan Borowsky, ACLU, October 2008]

Given the much higher proportion of crime committed by blacks and Hispanics, a lack of disparities in stops, etc., would be a red flag.

Ayres is arguing, among other things, that officers should ignore descriptions of black or Hispanic suspects, and instead racially target whites who fit no such description, and stop, frisk, search and arrest them. I realize that sounds insane and is exactly the sort of viciously racist profiling that Ayres and his comrades fantasize is routinely carried out against blacks and Hispanics. But racial profiling pseudo-science is insane and racist.

My own research and observations have led me to conclude that white policemen have long gone out of their way to avoid confrontations with blacks; the practice is called “de-policing.”

The truth should be the easiest defense against such propaganda. But in the world of multiculturally coerced public opinion, truth = death.

In New Jersey, the ACLU and the State Conference of Racist Black Preachers, or whatever the civil rights group is called, have for years insisted that state troopers racially profile black drivers. Back in 1999, State Police Superintendent Col. Carl Williams tried responding to the charges with the truth, breaking down the groups trafficking in drugs on New Jersey’s turnpikes by drug and race or ethnicity. Liberal Republican Gov. Christie Whitman fired Williams the next day.

As for black and Hispanic officers stopping fewer drivers from their respective groups, that could indicate ethnic favoritism on their part.

The LAPD has a history of problems with such officers. During the late 1980s, the department hired cadres of racist black and Hispanic sociopaths who wreaked mayhem, causing the worst scandal in the LAPD’s history - Rampart. But Ayres and his comrades had no interest in honestly telling the Rampart story.

LAPD officer and undercover journalist “Jack Dunphy” lays out the issues facing LAPD Chief William Bratton.

[Though] Bratton was critical of the Ayres report, he has as yet failed to disclose the information [that] … is readily available and would surely refute the report’s bottom line, to wit, that blacks in Los Angeles, and to a lesser extent Hispanics, commit crimes at a far greater rate than do whites, and are therefore subjected to a greater level of attention from police officers on patrol…

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa [who flunked the California bar exam all four times he took it, and thus cannot practice law] was once president of the L.A. chapter of the ACLU, and the rest of the city government is composed almost entirely of like-minded liberals. They are far too committed to politically correct ideals to disclose the cold and persistent facts that LAPD cops, indeed cops all over the country, know all too well…

[“Racial Profiling: The Myth that Never Dies,” by Jack Dunphy, National Review, October 27, 2008.]

Dallas Man, 72, Allegedly Fatally Shot a Burglar Behind His Home and then Went Back to Bed before Finally Calling Police

By A Texas Reader
Sun, Sep 29, 2019 9:58 p.m.

Authorities say a 72-year-old Dallas man fatally shot a suspected burglar behind his home and then went back to bed before finally calling police nearly two hours later.

ATR: Something doesn't add up.

N.S.: Was he violating the health code, by not immediately scooping?

In Desperation to Not Do Its Job, Corrupt, Incompetent DHS Seeks to Steal the Jurisdiction of the Corrupt, Incompetent FBI

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

America wastes billions of dollars every years on 17 official “intelligence” agencies, and assorted unofficial ones, and yet we have nobody who knows what he’s doing.

DHS to Poach Non-existent Terrorism Threat from FBI
September 30, 2019

When the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was created, it was because of the Muslim terrorist attack of 9/11. This was curious as that it was not created after the first attack on the Twin Towers. While in both cases there were related immigration violations among the two different groups of terrorists, both groups were mainly illegal aliens, whether aliens in the United States without a status, or aliens who had fraudulently obtained some sort of status. One could see both terrorist incidents as a failure of immigration enforcement, but under various administrations interior enforcement of the immigration laws, whether in the early 90s or the early 2000s, was lax at best, especially in even then defacto Sanctuary Cities like New York City.

Both attacks were perpetrated by groups of Muslim illegals. However, both groups were also the subject of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) ongoing operations at the time of the attacks. Basically, both attacks happened because of FBI failures. The group that perpetrated the first attack was infiltrated by an FBI informant, though that informant was not in deep enough to know the details of the Twin Towers attack. Similarly, the FBI was conducting an below-the-radar operation to find the associates of Zacarias Moussaoui and others of the larger 9/11 attack group. That, was obviously, a complete failure. Even though the FBI failed, they were not broken up as the legacy Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) was.

Ostensibly, the new DHS and the various immigration enforcement components were supposed to be concentrating on stopping terrorism, but those components, especially U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), were complete failures in finding and preventing terrorists from entering the United States or identifying them while they were applying for immigration benefits.

But the FBI retained the anti-terrorism portfolio after 9/11, and their failures. The FBI’s authority is to investigate, disrupt, and arrest terrorists and terrorist plots. Contrast this with DHS’ anti-terrorism responsibilities, which were nothing more than an accidental tasking coming out of the primary duty of DHS, which was to enforce immigration and customs laws. Laws which if properly enforced, could disrupt alien terrorist networks and attacks. However, under Jorge Bush and Barack Hussein Obama, interior enforcement of immigration laws was a sad joke. So sad was interior enforcement that even those Muslim terrorists identified as deportable aliens under the Jorge Bush Special Registration program were uniformly awarded legal permanent residency rather than deported.

This brings us to the now current anti-White panic, White Supremacist Terrorism, something as non-existent as hens’ teeth. And now DHS is planning to poach White Supremacist Terrorism from the FBI, which, interestingly, also had informants in Elohim City Compound, where infamous White Supremacist Terrorist Tim McVeigh stayed frequently.

While perhaps FBI failures might encourage its elimination in favor of a new more competent organization, DHS certainly isn’t either competent or legally able to take over the White Supremacist Terrorism portfolio, but LadyboyDACA (aka Kevin McAleenan) does desperately want something else to do rather than arrest illegal aliens.
Kevin McAleenan took the El Paso shooting personally. The acting secretary of the Department of Homeland Security had visited the city more than a dozen times. He recalled in an interview yesterday that among his first thoughts were the safety of the DHS workforce, which numbers some 4,000 people there, many of them Hispanic.

The shooter’s motivation quickly became clear, with 22 people dead in a Walmart and an online manifesto attributed to the shooter citing an “invasion” of immigrants. “This,” McAleenan recalls thinking, “was an attack on all of us, on our family.” Speaking to The Atlantic more than six weeks after the attack, he had an “El Paso Strong” bracelet on his wrist.

The El Paso shooting figures into a new strategy to counter terrorism and “targeted violence” that the Department of Homeland Security will release today, which The Atlantic obtained and describes here for the first time. The document dwells at length on the threat of white supremacists specifically, which is surprising coming from President Donald Trump’s administration, given that one of its first counterterrorism policies was to try to ban citizens from seven Muslim-majority countries. Trump has also pushed for a border wall, which he has said will help keep out terrorists, even though most fatal terrorist attacks in the United States in recent years have been carried out by U.S. citizens or permanent residents. The DHS document is an acknowledgment that, nearly 20 years after 9/11, the new terrorist threat comes largely from within—and not as much from jihadists as from the extreme right.

The department is clearly trying to send a message that it takes the threat of violent white nationalists seriously, and McAleenan said that when leadership lays out its goals, bureaucracies tend to move.
[DHS Is Finally Going After White Supremacists. It’s Not Going to Be Simple, by Kathy Gilsinan, The Atlantic, September 20, 2019]

Of course, nothing is further from the truth. There is no White Supremacist Terrorist threat, much less an international White Supremacist Terrorist threat, which would give DHS some nexus to its statutory authority to enforce immigration and customs laws.

While LadyboyDACA emphasizes DHS’ support function on the terrorism issue, your humble correspondent knows that the plan is to transform ICE SVU, DHS’ current sex police, into the new FBI and grab the terrorism portfolio from the Feebs, as the best opportunity to further abandon immigration enforcement. No more bad publicity of arresting Guatemalans at work-sites, now ICE SVU will be breaking down the doors of White podcasters and bloggers. And this will not be the first time that ICE SVU poaches; they do it all the time, whether it is poaching from the DEA at marijuana grows or the FBI over kidnapping jurisdiction over the Lindbergh Act and the Mann Act.

And don’t say we did not warn you that DHS was not content with busting illegal aliens, it wanted to go after whites with a vengeance. They don’t like arresting browns, but whites are a different story for LadyboyDACA.

Mexican Word of the Day

By A Texas Reader
Sun, Sep 29, 2019 6:46 p.m.

Mexican Word of the Day

American Officials are Not Letting Criminal Foreign Kids Attend Our Schools, but are Permitting Mexican Kids to Cross the Border, to Attend Them, at the Expense of United Saps

By A Texas Reader
Sun, Sep 29, 2019 7:57 p.m.

For some, the school commute means long waits, US border agents Despite the hurdles, many parents in northern Mexico hope their children will have a better future with a US education.

ATR: This is why I don't pay taxes.



Flex Savings Account for medical and dental.

Anything to minimize my exposure to the corrupt, anti-White State.

Breaking News: Beaumont PD Has Suspect in Mass Murder

By A Texas Reader
Sun, Sep 29, 2019 5:39 p.m.

Breaking news: Beaumont police say four people fatally shot; BPD has person of interest

N.S.: “Person of interest”?!

Racist, Black Killer of White NYCPD Officer Brian Mulkeen Identified as Antonio Lavance Williams

By R.C.
Sun, Sep 29, 2019 5:29 p.m.

"Suspect [sic] in NYPD cop Brian Mulkeen shooting identified as Antonio Lavance Williams"

N.S.: The Post gets more pc by the day. He's not the "suspect," he's the cop-killer. If he had gotten away, and the cops had arrested him, then he would be the suspect. Since he didn't get away, and we know he was the murderer, he's not the suspect. If the devil were still alive, the only point in calling him "the suspect," would be to protect against lawsuits, in case a racist jury supported him. That's not likely, at the moment, though just to be on the safe side, I say we dig him up, and kill 'em again!

Persecution of Christians Escalates in Algeria (There are Churches in Algeria?!)

By A.L.
Sun, Sep 29, 2019 3:36 p.m.

I was surprised there is even a single church in Algeria.

Keep the Amish Out of Texas! Amish Commit Mass Murder in Beaumont: 100+ People Gathered; City Hadn't Had a Mass Shooting in 5 Whole Years!

By A Texas Reader
Sun, Sep 29, 2019 10:02 p.m.

More than 100 people gathered across from a Beaumont duplex Sunday afternoon after four people were shot and killed - the city's first mass shooting in five years.


Amish gone wild?

ATR: Those dang buggies!

Making that clippity clop noise all dang day!

How the Left Eats its Own: Joyce Carol Oates’ Scorched-Earth Campaign for the Nobel Prize for Propaganda

Joyce Carol Oates’ Scorched-Earth Campaign for a Nobel Prize
By Nicholas Stix
September 12, 2014

Veteran novelist Joyce Carol Oates, 76, got attention for the Twitter campaign that she launched two weeks after the Mike Brown Hoax had been debunked, in which she sought to keep hoax alive. See Joyce Carol Oates on Michael Brown, The Threat of Black Crime, and the Evil People Who Don’t Believe the Media Version, by James Fulford.

Among other things, Oates repeated a key Leftist talking point: Condemning the police for not immediately (read: prematurely) removing Brown’s body.

Of course, the police had to leave the corpse in place, as it was part of a crime scene. Had they prematurely moved it, Oates and all the other people screaming bloody murder at them now would have blamed them for moving it too quickly, and thereby tainting the evidence.

And it turns out it was the black mob, not the white cops, who delayed the removal of the body. Calvin Whitaker, the private funeral director called by police to pick up Mike Brown’s body, has recounted how the terrifying black mob at the scene delayed him and his wife for an extra two hours, which they spent trapped, scrunched down in their SUV, unable to exit the vehicle, and surrounded by the mob, which also made it impossible to escape:
It was not a safe situation…. The police could not control the crowd. There was times where we feared for our lives…. There was gunshots while we were there…. It took so long, because we could not do our job. It was unsafe for us to be there. [A cop told the Whitakers] “Stay in your vehicles. You guys do not have vests. The best thing for you to do is to kind of get down, and let us get control of the situation.” [“Funeral director explains why it took so long to remove Michael Brown’s body from street” by FOX 4 Newsroom, Fox4KC, September 8, 2014.
Unbeknownst to most people, Oates has been preoccupied with race her entire career, in the same manner in which she has sought to keep hoax alive in the Brown case.

Last year, she published a 667-page novel, The Accursed, which she’d been working on, on and off, for almost 30 years. Stephen King in his review said that it “may be the world's first postmodern Gothic novel.” [Bride of Hades|“The Accursed,” by Joyce Carol Oates, by Stephen King, New York Times, March 17, 2013.]


In The Accursed, white elites in Princeton, 1905-1906, including university and future American president, Woodrow Wilson, are cursed by demons and the Devil himself, because they didn’t do anything about a double-lynching of a pregnant black woman and her brother in Camden NJ in 1905, as well as three other lynchings of blacks in other New Jersey towns at the time. A character addresses Woodrow Wilson saying

“These lynchings are common in the South, and the murderers never brought to justice, and now they have increased in New Jersey, there was a lynching in Zarephath only a year ago—where the ‘white supremacists’ have their own church—the Pillar of Fire—and in the Pine Barrens, and in Cape May …” [The Accursed by Joyce Carol Oates, 2013, p. 14 (pdf) ]
But in reality, there was no (0) lynching in Camden at that or any other time… let alone in Zarephath, the Pine Barrens, or Cape May.

A listing of American lynchings from 1882-1968 at the University of Missouri/Kansas City cites only two in New Jersey for the entire period. [Lynchings: By State and Race, 1882-1968 ] Only one of these was of a black; the other was of a white (as were 27% of the total nationwide).

The one New Jersey lynching I could find during the period: Former slave Samuel “Mingo Jack” Johnson, who was lynched in Eatontown back in 1886, after having been accused by a white woman of raping and beating her.

In a separate list of women who had been lynched, I found no entry of a woman of any race who had been lynched anywhere in America in 1905.

So Oates is propagating a falsehood. She would presumably say in her defense that it’s just a story—as imaginary as the “curse.”

But I say no—it’s a blood libel. Some of her colleagues will certainly be telling their students about imaginary “lynchings” in New Jersey, as if they’d really happened. When people have to constantly lie about the past, that’s a tip-off that it wasn’t as bad as they assert.


This spring, Oates published a new collection of stories, High Crime Area: Tales of Darkness and Dread. In one, set in Detroit in 1967, the year of America’s worst race riot, a white woman senses herself being followed by a black man. However, the black man turns out to be an angel. As’s Fulford commented: “Here’s what it’s about—treating black crime as myth, and self-defense as paranoia.”

(Significantly, Oates and her husband, Raymond J. Smith, responded to the black Detroit riots by fleeing from the city to Ontario, Canada.)

This is not merely a literary point. If Oates’ new Detroit-set short story is taken seriously by her mostly female readers, it will lead to them lowering their guard around black men so as not to be seen as “racist.” Some of these white women will inevitably be raped and even murdered.

Oates poses as a feminist. Why, then, does she seek to get white women raped and murdered?

Once Oates did write about a real monster, or at least she was inspired by one. Her 1966 short story, “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?,” which was turned into the 1985 movie, Smooth Talk, was inspired by serial killer Charles Schmid Jr., the “Pied Piper of Tucson,” who strangled three teenaged girls in 1965.

Schmid was, of course, white.

This is the stuff of literary “giants” today—sowing seeds of paranoia in white females’ minds about white men, most of whom are no danger to them, while sowing seeds of trust in the same white female minds about black men, many of whom are extremely dangerous.

The simplest indicator of what Joyce Carol Oates is about, is in her dedication to The Accursed.

“for my husband and first reader, Charlie Gross; and for my dear friends Elaine Pagels and James Cone”
Elaine Pagels is a controversial leftwing scholar of religion.

James Cone is the founder of genocidal Black Liberation Theology, whose most notorious follower is Barack Obama.

Cone notoriously wrote,

“If God is not for us and against white people,” writes Cone, “then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill gods who do not belong to the black community.”

[“Obama pastor’s theology: Destroy ‘the white enemy,’” World Net Daily, March 17, 2008.]

I might as well dedicate a book to Nazi propagandist Alfred Rosenberg.

For the past 30-odd years, racial socialist politics have reigned supreme in the literary world. So, needless to say, Oates has won many awards in her over 50-year-long writing career, including the National Book Award.

But the biggest one of all has so far eluded her.

In order to get a Nobel Prize in Literature nowadays, you must either be a colored person (or pseudo-colored, i.e., a white Spanish speaker), or a white who hates his own race, or who is at least a socialist, if not a Communist. Thus we have Nobels going to the likes of Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Wole Soyinka, Naguib Mahfouz, Camilo José Cela, Derek Walcott, Kenzaburo Oe, Octavio Paz, Toni Morrison, Dario Fo, Nadine Gordimer, Doris Lessing, et al.

There are typically two entries on each modern Nobel laureate’s page: A vacuous platitude that tells the reader nothing about the winner’s writing, and a second entry that gives the real story, the political rationale for the award.

Thus, we learn in the platitude section of recently deceased South African Nadine Gordimer,
“who through her magnificent epic writing has—in the words of Alfred Nobel—been of very great benefit to humanity.”
But the real explanation follows in the political section:
Deeply Involved in the Anti-Apartheid Struggle South African Nadine Gordimer wrote from an early age, and published her first story at 15. Her works comprise novels and short stories in which the consequences of apartheid form the central theme. Some of her books have at times been banned in her native country. She depicts extremely complicated personal and social relationships in her environment, putting the face of racism before the readers. The Nobel Prize in Literature 1991, Nadine Gordimer,]
In short, Gordimer won the Nobel Prize for writing anti-white propaganda.

In the case of black novelist Toni Morrison, the platitude section is merely a vague version of the political section:
Prize motivation: “who in novels characterized by visionary force and poetic import, gives life to an essential aspect of American reality”Gave the Afro-American People Their History Back

American author, editor and Professor Toni Morrison’s writing provide [sic] penetrating depictions of the world of the black people in America….

[The Nobel Prize in Literature 1993, Toni Morrison,]
In the case of West Indian black supremacist Derek Walcott, the Committee combined the platitudinous and the political:
Prize motivation: “for a poetic oeuvre of great luminosity, sustained by a historical vision, the outcome of a multicultural commitment”

[The Nobel Prize in Literature 1992, Derek Walcott,]

The prize ought to be renamed the Nobel Prize in Propaganda.

The only conservative winner I could find from during the past 60-odd years: Trinidadian-born V.S. Naipaul.

In my opinion, Naipaul is the greatest living writer in English or German, the two languages I read in. But I contend that he got the award not because of, but in spite of his greatness.

Naipaul is the last Englishman, a contemporary of my late Trinidadian father-in-law and, like Pa, has all the prejudices of a Victorian Englishman.

But the Nobel Committee recognized him because he is a famous colored writer. It even tried to make him sound like yet another racial socialist:
Prize motivation: “for having united perceptive narrative and incorruptible scrutiny in works that compel us to see the presence of suppressed histories”

[The Nobel Prize in Literature 2001, V. S. Naipaul,]

Also in my opinion, the greatest Nobel laureates of all were T.S. Eliot and Rudyard Kipling. Here’s Eliot:
Prize motivation: “for his outstanding, pioneer contribution to present-day poetry”

[The Nobel Prize in Literature 1948, Thomas Stearns Eliot,]

Short and sweet, eh?

Here’s Kipling:
Prize motivation: “in consideration of the power of observation, originality of imagination, virility of ideas and remarkable talent for narration which characterize the creations of this world-famous author”

[The Nobel Prize in Literature 1907, Rudyard Kipling,]

“Virility of ideas,” indeed! And note how the citation actually has a connection to the writer’s works.

Were Eliot and Kipling writing today, however, neither man would have a Chinaman’s chance of winning the Nobel. In fact, each would probably have to self-publish his works. Their “virility of ideas” would get them Derbyshired.

Was Joyce Carol Oates always a race-baiting hack? Does she desire to lure white women into letting themselves get raped and murdered by black men?

On the evidence, the answer to both questions is yes.

Whether or not Oates wins her coveted Nobel, perhaps one day there will be a monument built to her, saying something like this:

Rebecca Weiss was sexually assaulted and murdered on this spot on February 1, 2015. Rebecca was a student of Joyce Carol Oates at Princeton, and an avid reader of Prof. Oates’ works. Prof. Oates inspired Rebecca to become a teacher in Camden High School, helping underserved minority children. Although Rebecca was killed by one of her children, a boy who had otherwise been a gentle giant, she would not have wanted others to be discouraged from helping those most vulnerable and needy, or for anyone to blame the victims of racism for their occasional mistakes. Rebecca’s parents have since adopted the child, visit him constantly in prison, and have been fighting for him to be paroled.

Camden, N.J.

February 1, 2016

Newer Posts Older Posts Home