Jovan Pulitzer Uncovers Not "Watermarks" in Ballots - but Better (VIDEO)

By A Texas Reader

Thu, Aug 19, 2021 11:44 p.m.

Jovan Pulitzer Uncovers Not "Watermarks" in Ballots - but Better (VIDEO)

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/08/jovan-pulitzer-uncovers-not-watermarks-ballots-better-video/

 

https://theoutline.com/post/1713/the-history-of-the-secret-printer-code-that-may-have-caught-the-nsa-leaker#:~:text=Microdots%20aren%E2%80%99t%20some%20super%20sophisticated%20spy%20technology%20used,of%20your%20documents%20without%20you%20even%20realizing%20it.

 

https://www.eff.org/pages/list-printers-which-do-or-do-not-display-tracking-dots

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_Identification_Code

 

 

 

And below is from an email I sent on Friday, November 16, 2020.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_Identification_Code

Machine Identification Code - Wikipedia A Machine Identification Code (MIC), also known as printer steganography, yellow dots, tracking dots or secret dots, is a digital watermark which certain color laser printers and copiers leave on every single printed page, allowing identification of the device with which a document was printed and giving clues to the originator. Developed by Xerox and Canon in the mid-1980s, its existence ... en.wikipedia.org

 

Are these the "watermarks" found on official US government ballots?

 

How do I know about these?

 

It's simple.

 

I used to work for CompUSA years ago.  I did business-to-business sales for them.  I sold lots of laser printers, and lots of toner cartridges.  Used to read trade publications when I was bored.  Discovered these dots by reading trade journals.