[Re: “In 180 Reversal, CDC Head Says Vaccines Can’t Prevent Spread of Covid.”]
By Grand Rapids Anonymous Saturday, August 7, 2021 at 10:34:00 P.M. EDT "Vaxx Passports Useless,” Implies CDC’s Alensky (So are Masks)
They are just making up narratives now, and the media are not calling them out on it….
By Sundance at The Last Refuge blog
The Director of the CDC made an important admission during an interview today on CNN. CDC Director Rochelle Walensky stated the vaccine does not prevent COVID-19 infection, nor does it stop the vaccinated person from transmitting the infection or the delta variant.
According to Director Walensky, the only benefit from the vaccine now is presumably that it reduces the severity of symptoms.
If a vaccinated and non-vaccinated person have the same capacity to carry, shed and transmit the virus – with or without symptoms – then what difference does a vaccination passport or vaccination ID make?
According to CDC TODAY, both the vaxxed and non-vaxxed person walking into a restaurant, store, group, venue or workplace present the exact same risk to other people there, so how does the presentation of proof of vaccine make any sense?
Additionally, her entire statement makes no sense.
There is no evidence that vaccinated asymptomatic carriers are asymptomatic because of the vaccine. There are likely just as many asymptomatic non-vaccinated carriers. The data shows an equally distributed infection rate, regardless of vaccination rate, which is simultaneously admitted by Direcor Walensky, which, as an outcome, is an admission that undercuts the entire argument for compulsory vaccines.
The reverse is also evident in the data. There are just as many vaxxed carriers who are symptomatic (i.e., sick), as there are un-vaxxed carriers who are symptomatic (i.e., sick). The percentage of vaxxed and non-vaxxed people hospitalized is identical to the vaxxed/non-vaxxed population around the hospital.
In regional populations with extremely high vaccination rates, the COVID infection rate continues unabated.
The percentage of vaccinated people hospitalized is identical to the percentage of people vaccinated in the community.
GRA: The best advice I can give at this point, is if you don't want to catch the virus, don’t be around people who have it. If your city doesn’t have any cases to speak of, you can probably go
to supermarkets or restaurants without a problem. If there’s a large cluster, stay home (vaxxed or not) until it blows over.
--GRA
Sunday, August 08, 2021
CDC Director Rochelle Walensky Now Admits that the Vaxx Doesn’t Vaccinate against the Wuhan China Virus
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
In Israel now 95% of severe Wuhan cases are among the vaxxed (see The Gateway Pundit). As that percentage is higher than the percentage vaxxed, it appears that the vaccine (Israel used Pfizer) does NOT protect against severe disease as claimed. Furthermore, the vax may actually may you more apt to get sick and have severe disease--otherwise what explains the higher number of severe cases among vaxxed versus unvaxxed? So besides horrible and deadly side effects, perhaps the only real effect of the fake "vaccine" is to the bank accounts of the drug companies and the corrupt government employees and politicians. The Gateway Pundit calls Fauci a "mass murderer." I used to call him a Mengele--but i doubt if that cruel Nazi butcher killed as many as Fauci--both by paying to have the Wuhan Virus "enhanced" and by conspiring to deny people hydroxychloroquine (with zinc) and later ivermectin when studies continue to show both work.
jerry pdx
Ironically, what this means is that vaccinated people may be the ones more likely to spread the virus. Since the vaccine only reduces symptoms people who might be carrying the virus may be less likely to know they have it, so are confidently walking around maskless spreading it. Why hasn't the mainstream media put this CDC announcement on 24/7 rotation? Of course they can't, it could hurt the pharma money printing industry.
Agree with both of you.I was just talking to my cousin's wife today about the vaxx--neither one of them trust it,as I don't.She relayed a story of a 79 year old woman she knows who was talked into getting jabbed.The woman was in good health and her doctor convinced her to roll up a sleeve--she is now quite ill,with numerous medical problems:rapidly fluctuating blood pressure and fatigue are two of the symptoms.Her doctor says "it isn't the vaccine."
Of course not,but we know better.
--GRA
jerry pdx
The good thing about an announcement by the CDC director herself, you can direct people to the CNN Wolf Blitzer interview Rochelle Wolinsky so they can see there is official affirmation that taking the vaccine is a personal risk choice, not a public "safety necessity". I already showed this to a couple members of the family who have been claiming that not taking the jab is endangering others, response was shaking of the heads and vague mutterings of disbelief, then a complete refusal to admit they were wrong. And these are the same people who would pompously repeat back CDC public announcements, filtered through the MSM, as if they were pronouncements from God himself. They don't understand that the media selectively highlights certain CDC announcements while selectively downplaying or ignoring others because they don't fit the narratives they are pushing. No matter how much I try to explain to them, they can't comprehend that the CDC and the mainstream media are two different entities and the mainstream media has it's own independent (and quite evil) agenda.
Post a Comment