Latypova presents a compelling argument that the covid-19 vaccine itself originated as a response to the virus, which she believes was also a bioweapon. however, her analysis delves beyond the chinese people's liberation army, investigating the alleged involvement of the u.s. department of defense in the creation of the sars-cov-2 virus and the development of covid mRNA injections.
From: Steve Kirsch's newsletter <stevekirsch@substack.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 at 06:44:00 p.m. cdt
vsrf call thursday: Sasha Latypova!
vsrf call thursday: Sasha Latypova!
former big pharma executive Sasha Latypova will talk about the role of the us dod in the creation of the virus and the vaccine.
|
| ||||||||||||
VSRF Weekly Update
Thursday, May 11
7pm Eastern | 4pm Pacific
Thursday, May 11
7pm Eastern | 4pm Pacific
 |
On this week's VSRF Update, I am excited to be speaking with Sasha Latypova, a former pharmaceutical industry research and development executive. With her extensive experience in clinical trials, regulatory approvals, and interactions with the FDA, Latypova offers a unique expert opinion based on observed evidence.
Latypova presents a compelling argument that the Covid-19 vaccine itself originated as a response to the virus, which she believes was also a bioweapon. However, her analysis delves beyond the Chinese People's Liberation Army, investigating the alleged involvement of the U.S. Department of Defense in the creation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the development of Covid mRNA injections.
 |
The origins of covid-19 have been a subject of intense debate and speculation since the beginning of the pandemic. Until now, the dominant narrative has presented two main explanations: either a lab leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, attributed to the Chinese Communist Party, or the official account that the virus emerged naturally from the Wuhan wet markets. However, this binary perspective oversimplifies the complex nature of the situation. It is crucial to critically examine these narratives and explore alternative possibilities, acknowledging the inherent controversy surrounding the origins of Covid-19.
 |
One element of this controversy lies in the censorship of the lab leak hypothesis. While the first explanation was largely dismissed and labeled as a conspiracy theory, this doesn't automatically validate the alternative narrative. It is worth noting that Dr. Anthony Fauci's involvement in funding the Wuhan Institute with taxpayer dollars and subsequent misrepresentations have added fuel to the skepticism. These revelations prompt us to question whether other entities within the U.S. government, such as the Pentagon, could have been engaged in bio-weapon research. While this notion may sound conspiratorial, it is important not to dismiss it outright. It is vital to demand transparency regarding the types of bioweapons being developed, their location, associated costs, and ensuring accountability from those involved.
 |
The insights shared by Sasha Latypova shed light on the potential involvement of multiple entities and prompt us to demand transparency and accountability in understanding the development and deployment of bioweapons, SARS-CoV-2 virus and the development of Covid mRNA injections.
Important: VSRF needs your support if we are to continue our work
VSRF is critically low on funds, and I cannot support VSRF single-handedly.
If you are able to donate, please consider making a generous donation now. You'll be entitled to special benefits that we'll be announcing soon for the various donation levels ($100 and higher).
1 comment:
It really doesn't matter anymore,though I hear a few people in GR have come down with it lately,but overall,it's a non-factor at this point.
To tell you the truth.I miss being the only car on the highway when the "pandemic" was at full mania."Twilight Zone"ish--very enjoyable.
--GRA
Post a Comment