By Nicholas Stix
01/15/2009
Thursday, October 14, 2021
When It Comes to Reporting on Crime, the Media are Themselves Criminals
Police Want Help Solving Crimes; Media: Not with Our Help!
In today’s news, the Durham, NC police are trying to catch a burglar who ripped off the Choral Society of Durham on Monday, stealing money from an unlocked office during a fundraiser. But in addition to the burglar’s refusal to get religion and turn himself in, the Durham PD is confronted with his powerful accomplice, the local News & Observer newspaper.
The N&O is engaged in a form of obstruction of justice so entrenched at newspapers across the country, and institutionalized in longtime, industry-dominant “style” guidelines at shops like the Associated Press and the New York Times that, not unlike the upper-classes’ attitude regarding their continuous criminal conspiracies violating federal immigration, tax, and labor laws through the hiring of illegal immigrants, the criminals (aka “editors,” “producers,” and “reporters”) involved think of their acts as their birthright.
When police ask for a description of an offender, the first characteristic they ask for is his sex, followed by his race. Once they also get his height, weight, hair and eye color, identifying marks, clothing, etc., they give the description to officers and to the media for dissemination to the public. The media then typically censor the description, in order to render it worthless, so as to aid and abet the criminal, in avoiding arrest.
In the case in question, the N&O provides the following“description”:
The man had short black hair and was missing his two front teeth, according to police. He was wearing a brown jacket with a diamond pattern woven in it and blue jeans.
The only reader comment so far reads thusly:
“Eye witness description is lacking fundamentals, was this person, white, yellow, red, or black?? Otherwise any hockey player minus the jacket fits the description.”[Durham police want help solving a theft, From Staff Reports, News & Observer, Published: Wed, Jan. 14, 2009 12:58 P.M.; Modified Wed, Jan. 14, 2009 01:02 P.M.]
Every week, I either stumble upon, or readers e-mail me stories about often horrific crimes with “raceless” victims and/or perpetrators.
Since we are talking about at-large criminals, in every such case, the newspaper in question is, rather than helping the public, endangering it, while at the same time causing generalized paranoia, since people know that a criminal is on the loose, but have no way of identifying him and protecting themselves from him. With violent criminals, by deliberately forestalling the arrest of the offender, this criminal practice can cause additional people to be assaulted, raped, and murdered, who otherwise would never have encountered the assailant, because he would have already been caught. Such media obstruction of justice also endangers innocents who, due to willfully misleading descriptions may be misidentified as suspects or caught in the middle of an attempted wrongful arrest, and harmed or even killed. (Some subversive newspaper editors and TV news producers at times beat the censorship, by adding photographs of suspects.)
As James Fulford recounted in “Hate Crimes, Real Crimes, and Relevance,” the New York Times instituted its policy of protecting black criminals way back in 1946! Even then, the Times put loyalty to black criminals over loyalty to the law.
And in 1964, a Times reporter was forced to resign for writing the truth about a racist black Harlem gang, the Blood Brothers, which was “recruiting and training forces planning to kill whites.” When race riots then broke out in Harlem, the Times dutifully blamed the messenger, rather than the racist black gang or racist black rioters.
The reason for the loyalty to black (and increasingly, Hispanic) criminals is that journalism is dominated by white leftists and black and Hispanic racists who are joined in a war on American society. They see “minority” criminals variously as allies, pawns, and clients. To such alleged journalists’ devilish mind-set, the criminals are the “good guys,” and the police–at least the ones who haven’t themselves gone over to the dark side–all belong in jail:
Just as every cop is a criminal,
And all the sinners saints,
As heads is tails, Just call me Lucifer,
‘Cause I’m in need of some restraint.[Sympathy for the Devil, by Mick Jagger and Keith Richards, The Rolling Stones.]
As Fulford once observed,
But media blackouts on race and crime produce what Marxists call a “false consciousness”. People don’t know the facts about crime. And they can’t decide on public policy because they don’t have those facts.[“Race, Relevance and the Public’s Right to Know,” by James Fulford, VDARE, August 9, 2002.]
Which, of course, is the point. As far as the MSM and their education and entertainment comrades are concerned, the public isn’t supposed to make informed decisions on public policy. And since they have variously suppressed the facts about race and crime, or in the case of Hollywood, turned those facts upside down, the alliance is then positioned to charge anyone complaining about minority crime with being guilty of trafficking in “racist stereotypes,” or as Joe Guzzardi put it, “hate facts.”
And as Fulford once pointed out, facts about criminals’ race or ethnicity are not only important to public safety, but interesting!
But “journalists” who always shout about “the public’s right to know,” when they seek to sabotage a political enemy, have contempt for that same public, when it wants to know something. Media censors then declare that information off-limits, “irrelevant,” and change the subject to yet more moron fodder about entertainment delinquents. And newspaper persons wonder why, despite a population explosion, their industry has lost credibility with the public, and been in a years-long death spiral?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Nothing changes--except for the worse.That article was written BEFORE the cities got on a bandwagon and hired black police chiefs almost exclusively.
Why did that change crime reporting?black chiefs are as much lying pieces of sh*t as black thugs.They don't want it out there that black crime is escalating and unstoppable.There is no way to prove it,but I'll bet,many shootings and robberies are covered up to put lipstick on the nig crime reports.
I see police sirens by the dozens fly by my house(once in a while)--usually only seen when a shooting/murder has been committed.The next day--there's absolutely nothing in print.
Two months ago,the GR cops had over 3/4 of a mile of streets blocked off(4 blocks from my house)for two hours.Cop cars in front of every intersection--I've NEVER witnessed that before in Grand Rapids.
The next day--not a word.
Wait until blacks are pushed in as editors of newspapers/ websites.You don't have to--just watch what's been going on with NNN(Negro Nightly News).
99.9999% censorship of black crime.
And that's the way it is,Walter.
--GRA
jerry pdx
About all we have left is Breitbart, as a "major" media outlet, for some kind of news with an element of truth. Fox has eliminated comments, which is another sign of their movement to the left so I'm about done with them. One thing I like about Breitbart is that the articles sometimes dispense with "journalistic objectivity" and passivity and just plain go off. I know you just posted a couple of article about the school girl raped in a bathroom in Virginia but here's a Breitbart article about it that pulls no punches. The writer let's you know exactly how he feels: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/10/14/nolte-loudoun-county-defends-alleged-rape-cover-up-attacks-victims-father/
It's the same everywhere now -- here's a story I saw yesterday in the German media:
Attacken mit Messern und Pfefferspray: Überfälle im Günthersburgpark verängstigen Jugendliche -- Überfälle und Übergriffe auf Teenager verunsichern die Feierwütigen im Günthersburgpark in Frankfurt. Die Polizei greift durch
To paraphrase: 'Frightening attacks on teenagers in Günthersburgpark (link, in Frankfurt) with knives and pepper spray -- increased police presence announced'
In den vergangenen Wochen und Monaten soll es nach Recherchen der Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung zu einer Reihe von Raubüberfällen im Günthersburgpark in Frankfurt gekommen sein. Teenager griffen laut FAZ andere Jugendliche mit Pfefferspray, Schlagstöcken und Fäusten an und raubten unter anderem Smartphones und Bargeld.
In the article you learn that this has been going on for months: 'Teenagers' (they use the English word) or Jugendliche (young people) have been marauding in mobs of 20 or so through the park, attacking people with fists, clubs, and pepper spray, threatening them with knives, and stealing money and smart phones.
You learn absolutely nothing about who these 'Teenagers' might be.
Then at the bottom of the page:
Kommentare -- Liebe Leserinnen und Leser, wir bitten um Verständnis, dass es im Unterschied zu vielen anderen Artikeln auf unserem Portal unter diesem Artikel keine Kommentarfunktion gibt. Bei einzelnen Themen behält sich die Redaktion vor, die Kommentarmöglichkeiten einzuschränken. -- Die Redaktion
'Dear readers, in contrast to other stories on our website, we're not allowing comments on this article. The editors reserve the right to restrict or prohibit comments on certain articles. Thank you for your understanding.'
Of course every reader knows why they aren't allowing comments: because the 'Teenagers'/'Jugendliche' attacking and robbing people in Günthersburgpark aren't Biodeutsch -- they're either migrants or Passdeutsche, young men who may be German citizens (Pass = passport) but have a migrant background (Migrationshintergrund) -- and this may also be the reason this article is only appearing now, when as stated the attacks have been happening for months: news about the attacks was suppressed.
The press must be insurrected--removed from their buildings of deceptions and lies by US.Imho,that's the only solution to changing the
pro-black,anti-White content we see on TV 24/7 these days.
The media must be made to understand that we are unhappy with the garbage they air--which can only be accomplished if they hear from us personally.
Yes,if that happened,I'm sure we'd already be in the midst of Civil War 2---a good thing also.
--GRA
HEART INFLAMMATION REPORTS FORCE FDA TO DELAY VAXX FOR ADOLESCENTS
GRA:Two questions:Why would myocardial inflammation be limited to an age group that's least likely to suffer from it and also,shouldn't we assume that there's MORE of this condition occurring than what's being allowed to be reported?If healthy 15 year olds are being attacked by the vaxx,why wouldn't other older,less healthy people be as well?
(ZH)Following the same 'science' as the four Nordic nations that either banned completely or selectively, the FDA has decided to delay a decision on authorizing Moderna Inc.'s Covid-19 vaccine for adolescents to assess whether the shot may lead to heightened risk of a rare inflammatory heart condition, according to people familiar with the matter.
The Wall Street Journal reports that the FDA has been taking another look at the risk of the condition, known as myocarditis, among younger men who took Moderna's vaccine, especially compared with those who received the vaccine from Pfizer Inc. and BioNTech SE, the people said.
That decision has pushed MRNA shares lower.
--GRA
Also:What's "rare"? A thousand,100,000,one million--out of 178 million shots?
Please clarify.
--GRA
SMOLLETT TRIAL TO START NOVEMBER 29TH AS SCHEDULED
(Breitbart) Disgraced actor Jussie Smollett will have to face trial after a judge refused to dismiss his case.
Judge James Linn says the jury selection in Smollett’s trial will begin on November 29 after denying the actor’s lawyer’s Hail Mary pass at getting the case dismissed on Friday, according to a report by Page Six.
The former Empire star’s attorney reportedly argued that bringing Smollett into court would be a violation of his rights, since he had already performed community service and given up a $10,000 bond as part of a previous on-prosecution agreement with the Cook County state’s attorney’s office.
But Judge Linn disagreed, saying he will not interrupt the case, which is now being led by a special prosecutor appointed by another judge.
The embattled actor is accused of lying to police when he reported in early 2019 that racist and homophobic individuals wearing red hats, and yelling “MAGA country,” attacked him in downtown Chicago.
Smollett was charged with filing a false police report, in which the actor provided an imaginative account of his supposed run-in with Trump supporters, who he claimed beat him, poured bleach on him, and looped a rope around his neck, before informing him that he was in “MAGA country” Chicago.
But a Chicago police investigation later claimed that Smollett orchestrated the attack. The actor was then arrested and charged with the fraud. Investigators also said they discovered Smollett paid two Nigerian brothers, Abel and Ola Osundairo, to stage the hate crime against him.
In February, Chicago’s local CBS affiliate obtained video of the two brothers, questioned in connection with the hate hoax, purchasing ski masks from a store one day prior to the purported assault.
But Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx quickly dismissed the case and released Smollett, dropping the charges.
A judge then assigned a special prosecutor to the case, who charged Smollett with disorderly conduct over the police reports. The actor has pleaded not guilty to the charges.
GRA:Will he be convicted,the way it's going now?60/40 no--or just a limp wrist slap.
--GRA
Post a Comment