Friday, October 15, 2021

black Expert: Gangs of blacks Carjack, Kidnap, Gang-Rape, Torture and Murder White Couples on a Daily Basis

‘There was No Racial Motive in the Knoxville Horror’
By Nicholas Stix
Friday, February 21, 2020 at 4:37:00 PM EST

I just stumbled onto the column below, by black supremacist Earl Ofari Hutchinson. When I saw the 2020 comment, “Oh and Stix, it turned out there was no racial motive here,” I assumed it was sarcasm from one of my regular contributors. I just noticed, however, when I went back to determine who had sent in the link, that it was from my most persistent troll, Ryu238. That’s his reddit handle.

You almost never see him anymore, because he has degenerated from daily seeking to bury me in leftwing links that will purportedly debunk everything I’ve ever written (I eventually stopped reading them, as he sent too many.), to just sending in a few personal insults per week, which I send to the spam folder.

Ryu238 said...

Gra.

Oscar’s [sic] for best film do go to foreign films sometimes.

“Understandable, he [Trump] can’t read,” the studio tweeted.

GRA: That’s a funny line, but actually, what Trump is reading are the tea leaves—which he sees as Hollywood giving recognition to a foreign film over an American film. The Oscars have always rewarded AMERICAN filmmaking—foreign films have their own sub-category. It shouldn’t have happened. Trump has it right again”

Ryu238: It has happened before several times.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/oscars-parasite-becomes-sixth-movie-be-nominated-best-picture-international-feature-1267963

Who said the Oscar’s [sic] are for Americans only?

Oh and Stix, it turned out there was no racial motive here:

https://m.jacksonfreepress.com/news/2007/jun/20/hutchinson-do-blacks-kill-whites-because-theyre/


[Hutchinson] Do Blacks Kill Whites Because They’re White?
Jackson Free Press
Wednesday, June 20, 2007

A recent murder trial [sic] in Tennessee shows an aspect of violent crime in America that isn’t much talked about: Whites are far more likely to be the victims and blacks their assailants in interracial crimes than the other way around.

[N.S. Correction: The first trial in this case didn’t take place until 2008.]

Last January, Channon Christian, 21, and Christopher Newsom, 23, were abducted, robbed, brutally sexually assaulted and then murdered in Knoxville, Tenn. The four defendants charged in the case are black; Christian and Newsom were white.

Beleaguered Knoxville Police Chief Sterling Owen IV was emphatic in his stern remarks at a press conference in mid-May. There was absolutely no evidence, Owen said, that the murders of Channon Christian and Chris Newsom were racially motivated.

The chief had to be forceful and direct in his admonition about the torture killing of the young white couple. As the trial of five young blacks charged with the couple’s murder approaches, several white supremacist groups have staged noisy protests in Knoxville against what they call the double standard in the case.

They scream that the national press maintains a wall of silence on black-on-white murder cases because it fears inflaming racial tensions, and it’s scared stiff that it will be called racist. Yet, when whites assault or murder blacks, the press and civil rights leaders supposedly leap over each other to blare it out as headline news.

This is a false, self-serving and cheap ploy to knock the press and civil rights leaders. However, the gruesome murders of Christian and Newsom do cast a troubling glance at an aspect of violent crime in America that isn’t much talked about beyond the rants of white extremists. And that’s that whites are far more likely to be the victims and blacks their assailants in interracial crimes than the other way around, and those crimes are seldom, if ever, labeled hate crimes.

In the past five years according to FBI figures, on average there were 1.5 million to 2 million racial crossover crimes in the country. In a well-meaning effort to counter the notion that there’s an explosion of black-on-white crime, authorities in Knoxville culled Tennessee Bureau of Investigation stats on violent crimes and noted that in the vast majority of these crimes, whites are more likely to maim and kill other whites, and blacks do the same with other blacks.

Violent crimes in the state and the nation, no matter the color of the victim and perpetrator, have dropped during the past five years. Buried in the stats, though, the report found that black offenders commit four times as many crimes against whites as the reverse. That inadvertently [?] adds fuel to the charge that whites are under assault from blacks.

The president of the Knoxville NAACP swiftly denounced the killings and expressed deep sorrow for the victim’s [sic] families. Yet, there’s some truth to the charge that civil-rights leaders generally don’t express outrage at heinous crimes committed by blacks against whites. Many blacks shrug off the crimes with the bitter remark that whites have been killing blacks for years and getting away with it, and there has been no massive explosion of white outrage at the lax treatment of white killers.

The seeming nonchalance of many blacks toward black-on-white crime doesn’t mean that blacks are insensitive to victims of crime. They are not. [N.S.: Liar.] Blacks are far more likely than any other group in America to be the victims of violent crime, and they know first-hand the pain and suffering violent crime causes. They don’t color-code crime—crime is crime, no matter the color of the victim or assailant.

[N.S.: Well, that’s a bald-faced lie.]

There is also no evidence that black criminals target whites because they are white. [N.S.: An obvious lie.] They target them for their money and valuables. These crimes are almost all cases of garden-variety street crime. Police and prosecutors, in trying to determine whether to prosecute an interracial murder or attack as a hate crime, have to figure out if racial animus caused the crime.

For it to be a hate crime, they have to prove that a black intentionally targeted a white victim solely because of race. That takes hard evidence of racial taunts, threats, writings or statements by the perpetrator to prove race was the motivating factor in the attack. In the absence of that evidence, the charge that the attack was a hate crime won't fly.

[N.S.: When a White kills a black, the media and the authorities automatically assume it was a “hate crime.” But when a black kills a White, the authorities and the media automatically assume it was not a “hate crime,” even when the Black killer made racist taunts.]

The suggestion that the national press engages in a cover-up to quash murders of whites committed by blacks because it’s afraid to offend blacks is absurd. [N.S.: Liar.] The better explanation is that crime news is so routine that unless the accused murderer is O.J. Simpson, Phil Spector, Robert Blake or some other big-name celebrity, there’s little chance it’s going to be the stuff of endless nightly nationwide newscasts.

[N.S.: Hutchinson’s logical implication is that gangs of blacks carjack, kidnap, gang-rape, torture and murder White couples on a daily basis.]

Still, black-on-white violence anywhere stirs fear among some whites that crime-prone blacks are out to get them, that blacks will seize any opportunity they can to commit violence against whites. When blacks say or do nothing about these attacks, it is taken by some as a tacit signal that blacks put less value on white lives. This is ridiculous. [N.S.: Liar.] But white supremacists will still scream loudly that the Knoxville murders of Christian and Newsom proves there’s a double standard in interracial murder cases. That scream should be ignored.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is a political analyst and social commentator, and the author of the book, The Emerging Black GOP Majority (Middle Passage Press), a hard-hitting look at the GOP’s courting of black voters.

Previous Comments

ID
75005
Comment

Good column. Earl raised the questions and supplied the answers I would have given therefore I can't add anything except that crime is apparently awful every where. I'm never sad when the intended victim is able to kill the assailant. In fact, I'm happy when this happens.
Author
Ray Carter
Date
2007-06-21T08:05:00-06:00
ID
75006
Comment
Great job, Earl.
Author
LatashaWillis
Date
2007-06-22T16:05:04-06:00
ID
75007
Comment
I agree with Earl.Could it be that those who are crying racist or hate crime act are using those arguments to futher their hatred agendas. Could it be they think blacks feel like they do about another race?? Makes me think. What about You? I still remember those statements made during the Seale trial, "he's to old" etc.
Author
jada
Date
2007-06-22T16:59:52-06:00
ID
75008
Comment
jada, these people probably think that everyone else thinks like they do, which gives them justification in their minds to continue to perpetuate hate. Author
LatashaWillis
Date
2007-06-22T17:09:32-06:00
ID
75009
Comment
Point well taken L.W.
Author
jada
Date
2007-06-22T17:27:14-06:00

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

jerry pdx
More details on the Asian lesbian love triangle that resulted in a cop shooting two other women: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/off-duty-cop-accused-of-shooting-lover-and-killing-other-woman-identified-and-charged-with-murder/ar-AAPz8vQ?li=BBnbfcL
Turns out the cop is 31 yr. old Yvonne Wu who murdered her girlfriend and another female acquaintance of hers. Still no details on why she did it, I'm assuming it was a jealousy triangle but we'll see if more information becomes available.
Judging from the photo, she's actually kind of cute, not the dyke I expected. Probably an socially insecure mental basket case though, most lesbians I've met are exactly that.

Anonymous said...

jerry pdx
I do wish you'd publish comments by your critics, even the trolls. I know most of what they write is useless garbage but I think everything should be put out there and let the readers sift through it to decide for themselves if it's worthwhile.

Anonymous said...

Wu,Li and Liang---there's some American names for you,right up there with Tlaib and Ilhan.

--GRA

Anonymous said...

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is a political analyst and social commentator, and the author of the book, The Emerging Black GOP Majority (Middle Passage Press), a hard-hitting look at the GOP’s courting of black voters.

GRA:RepubliCOONS--black Republicans(I don't believe it myself).On the other side of the political spectrum,liberal Whites,who always take the black's side over their own race,I call DemoCRACKERS.

I wonder if Lesta will steal those terms from me,lol.

--GRA

eahilf said...

I've long been convinced Blacks select white victims out of racial animosity -- I think Tessa Majors was attacked and senselessly/viciously stabbed to death out of racial animosity -- of course this is usually immediately denied, even when there's a whiff of it (often for good reason).

I tell Whites t every opportunity: don't endorse 'hate crime' laws in any way, including/especially by demanding they be applied equally when the 'hate' is directed against Whites -- these laws were never intended to apply to Whites, and will never be applied that way.

Of course it must be admitted that most victims of black criminals are other Blacks.

Anonymous said...

There is a high likelihood that blacks kill Whites for racial reasons and kill blacks for more mundane reasons--money,sports arguments,sat on a nig's car,made moves on a girlfriend,ripped off on dope,gang crap etc.

I'd consider this a hate crime if it was strictly a murder being perpetrated for its own sake--no robbery first.It might have even evolved as follows:

"Look at that White bi**h,she must have some scratch,let's rob her ass."

Robbery--then murder.No rape--a true sign of race hate.

Usually blacks rape,murder(and in some cases)torch White vics.

There are exceptions to the rule,as always.Plus there are plenty of cases of simple assault on Whites and Asians by blacks--that are obviously race motivated.

The Tessa Majors case is less clear to me in that respect,because the initial motive appeared to be robbery.
--GRA

eahilf said...

>The Tessa Majors case is less clear to me

Per the recent stories I read about the crime, it happened like this: one of them went up behind her and kicked her in the back, knocking her down -- she got up and struggled with the guy who knocked her down; she defended herself -- while this was going on, another one came up and grabbed her, putting her in a headlock -- while she was in a headlock, one of them pulled a knife and viciously stabbed her repeatedly -- at least one of the stab wounds pierced her heart (she had no chance).

I ask myself: 1) was she chosen as a victim because she was white? -- 2) after she resisted, was she stabbed so viciously because she was white?

My answers are: 1) yes, partly; it was also probably partly a crime of opportunity -- 2) yes, most definitely; I do not believe for a minute that they would have stabbed a black woman like that.

I'm fed up with giving them the benefit of the doubt -- fuck that, they don't deserve it -- enough.

Anonymous said...

As Paul Harvey used to say...the rest of the story:

"That's when Lewis said Weaver ran up behind her and kicked her in the back and demanded her phone and cash. She responded "are you seriously trying to rob me?" and the two tussled on the ground."

GRA:If it was a robbery(and we really don't know that--except black testimony)and they demanded cash and a phone,legally,it couldn't be a pure hate crime,imho.

Personally,I'd love it if all the blacks were collected and dropped into the Arctic Circle or aliens plucked every one of them off the earth and said--"Sorry earthlings,failed experiment"--and took them from whence they came--whatever.In this case,it wasn't a pure hate crime--at least at the start.It may have morphed into one,but the motive of robbery eliminates the legal aspect of a hate crime,as I see this case.

--GRA

eahilf said...

>it couldn't be a pure hate crime,imho

I didn't say that/use those words -- read my comment(s) again, perhaps more carefully.

Besides, there is no such thing as a 'pure hate crime': 'hate' is always a criminal enhancement related to motive -- you will be charged with a 'hate crime' enhancement, and may get a longer sentence, if they decide 'hate' was a motivating factor when you committed the underlying crime.

>but the motive of robbery eliminates the legal aspect of a hate crime

I don't care about that.

But no it really doesn't -- a robbery can be the underlying crime when it's decided to add a 'hate crime' enhancement -- it depends on how the prosecution wants to spin motive, and whether there is some evidence of 'hate' as a motive.

Important note: as I've said before here and elsewhere, 'hate crimes' are bullshit -- they were enacted to intimidate and harass whitey as his country is being demographically stolen from him -- (they've since been extended to include more designated victim groups, i.e. not just racial 'minorities') -- I don't think 'hate crime' statutes ought to exist -- no self-respecting white person should endorse their existence and use -- they will never be proportionately applied to punish 'hate' (whatever that is) against Whites -- Eric Holder said so in front of Congress (find the video).

I said racial animosity plays a role when Blacks pick white victims -- in this particular case, it also played a role in the vicious stabbing/murder.

Let me state it as clearly as I can:

I believe racial animosity often plays a role when Blacks criminally target Whites, even when it otherwise appears to be a 'crime of opportunity'.

Which means I think this is also true of Tessa Majors.

But much more importantly in her tragic case:

I do not believe for a minute that they would have stabbed a black woman like that.

Meaning I do not believe they would have viciously stabbed/murdered a young black 'sister' for the offense of resisting robbery.

But due to my general opinion re 'hate crimes', I don't think this ought to play a role in the judicial system -- I say it mostly to WAKE WHITES UP to the danger they face as they become a minority in America -- non-whites don't like them.

I mean think about the savagery: plunging a knife into her chest (again and again) because she didn't want to surrender her phone or whatever -- so I don't really care about the details of how the crime unfolded -- they are irrelevant to my point.

And I also must repeat:

I am tired of society giving Blacks the benefit of the doubt. About anything. Period.

Anonymous said...

"The seeming nonchalance of many blacks toward black-on-white crime doesn't mean that blacks are insensitive to victims of crime."

Thank you Ofari you foo'. Blacks are not insensitive to black on white crime. Some of them enjoy such criminality. And others mutter to themselves the whitey probably had it coming.

Ryu238 said...

Hey, heard you were smack talking me behind my back. Interestingly you remind me of white killers who claim they are victimized:
https://www.reddit.com/r/BestOfOutrageCulture/comments/ou715x/its_amazing_how_bigots_try_and_pretend_they_are/