Is it possible that 88% of corrupt govt workers are not named because doing so would be racist? If non whites make up the overwhelming majority of corruption as it seems, than accurately reporting it would be asking for a DOJ investigation of profiling. http://wastefraudandabuse.org/watchdogs-let-errant-feds-go-anonymous/
"Six of the top inspectors general (IG) — presidentially-appointed watchdogs tasked with fighting waste, fraud and abuse in the federal bureaucracy — withheld the names of government employees in 88 percent of the reports they issued over a six-month period."
I am a dissident journalist, whose work has been published in dozens of daily newspapers, magazines, and journals in English, German, and Swedish, under my own name and many pseudonyms. While living in internal exile in New York, where I am whitelisted, I maintain NSU/The Wyatt Earp Journalism Bureau and some eight other blogs (some are distinctive but occasional venues, while others are mirrors), and also write for stout-hearted men such as Peter Brimelow and Jared Taylor. Please hit the “Donate” button on your way out. Thanks, in advance.
Follow my tweets at @NicholasStix.
1 comment:
Is it possible that 88% of corrupt govt workers are not named because doing so would be racist? If non whites make up the overwhelming majority of corruption as it seems, than accurately reporting it would be asking for a DOJ investigation of profiling.
http://wastefraudandabuse.org/watchdogs-let-errant-feds-go-anonymous/
"Six of the top inspectors general (IG) — presidentially-appointed watchdogs tasked with fighting waste, fraud and abuse in the federal bureaucracy — withheld the names of government employees in 88 percent of the reports they issued over a six-month period."
Post a Comment