Sunday, October 03, 2021

CDC: Vaccine CANNOT Prevent Transmission

By An Old Friend

Items from it that leave me scratching my head:

1. "It's striking to me that Americans would spend more time researching a new car before they bought one than taking a vaccine that's made out of synthetic DNA, or synthetic RNA, and can change your genetic makeup forever. I mean, come on."

Is it really possible to change the "genetic makeup" of an adult?


2. "The doctor has 46 peer-reviewed publications on the infection and has commented extensively on the medical response to the COVID-19 crisis in media appearances."

Someone has ***46*** refereed publications within about 18 months?!

[N.S.: That can't be legit. The only writer I can think of who could be that prolific would be ME (not on scientific topics), but only during the early aughts, and maybe Steve Sailer.]


If vaccine cannot prevent transmission, what is the excuse for all the mandates?

"CDC director Rochelle Walensky says that the vaccine *cannot* prevent transmission. So why are all these Pro-Vaxxers saying that it can?

CDC director Rochelle Walensky says that the vaccine *cannot* prevent transmission. So why are all these Pro-Vaxxers saying that it can? pic.twitter.com/8aaDTh8N3T
— Anthony Brian Logan (ABL) 🇺🇸 (@ANTHONYBLOGAN) October 2, 2021
If the vaccine cannot stop transmission, then what's the purpose of mandating it?
— Anthony Brian Logan (ABL) 🇺🇸 (@ANTHONYBLOGAN) October 2, 2021"



7 comments:

Anonymous said...

The vaxxers ARE following the science--the science of manipulation and propaganda.

--GRA

Anonymous said...

This vaxxx issue will be studied and debated for decades to come. And with no real conclusive results. A thousand experts and two thousand opinions and theories I fear.

Anonymous said...

Metastudy found that ivermectin prevented catching the Fauci-Wuhan virus by 86%. Some studies found it 100% effective in preventing infection. Meanwhile 63% of deaths from the Fauci virus in Britain were among "fully vaxxed" patients.

Anonymous said...

First we were told that the vax will keep you from getting sick, then that it will prevent others from getting sick, finally that, okay, you can get sick, but you won't go to the hospital and you won't die. Now it comes out that it doesn't keep you from getting infected, it "CAN'T" prevent transmission, and finally, with 63% of the Covid deaths in Britain being fully vaxxed, it DOESN"T PREVENT DEATH! So what does it do beside a horrendous history of adverse effects--including death? Well it makes drug companies richer and makes politicians more powerful. Will people ever wake up to this scam--and what will they do?

Anonymous said...

Some people are quitting their jobs---not enough though.The airline employees seemingly caved in with a supposed 95% rate of jabs.I believe Delta is the last airline company to leave jabs as voluntary.

It's tough to ask tens of thousands of people to give up income,but if EVERYBODY stood together,the COMPANIES would be forced to change policy and not get away with demanding vaxxes for employees.
--GRA

eahilf said...

>Some people are quitting their jobs---not enough though.

No one should quit over a current or threatened/looming vax mandate -- make the company terminate you, and do everything you can to force them to provide a termination letter, signed by management and on company stationary, giving the specific reason -- if necessary talk to a lawyer to see how best to go about this.

If you quit then attempting some/any sort of legal action later becomes more complicated/difficult.

Generally employment in the US is 'at will', which is a specific legal term meaning the company can terminate you at any time, for no or any reason -- on the other hand, you can quit whenever you want -- some employment contracts, e.g. union agreements, may have qualifying provisions -- so consulting a lawyer may be helpful.

Now would be a good time to reconsider the ramifications of 'at will' employment.

eahilf said...

>stationary

stationery