Monday, May 20, 2019

The Mutiny on the Constellation: Part VI of the Report of the Investigative, Congressional Sub-Committee on the Racist, 1972 Black Mutinies Aboard the U.S.S. Kitty Hawk and the U.S.S. Constellation


Part I: “Remember the Kitty Hawk! Remember the Constellation! West Point’s Female Black Supremacists are Continuing a Grand U.S. Military Civil Rights Tradition!
“Mutiny! Two Racist Mutinies the U.S. Navy Has “Disappeared,” and the Shadow Navy Command Structure”
;

Part II: “The Congressional Report on the Racist, Black Mutinies in 1972 aboard the U.S.S. Kitty Hawk and the U.S.S. Constellation: Findings”;

Part III: “The Racist, 1972 Black Mutinies aboard the U.S.S. Kitty Hawk and the U.S.S. Constellation: Opinions of the Investigative, Congressional Sub-Committee”;

Part IV: “Mutiny! Recommendations: Opinions of the Investigative, Congressional Sub-Committee on the Racist, 1972 Black Mutinies aboard the U.S.S. Kitty Hawk and the U.S.S. Constellation;

Part V: “The Mutiny on the Kitty Hawk: ‘Kill the son-of-a-bitch! Kill the white trash! Kill, kill, kill!’ The Report of the Investigative, Congressional Sub-Committee on the Racist, 1972 Black Mutinies aboard the U.S.S. Kitty Hawk and the U.S.S. Constellation;

Part VII: “Permissiveness and Appeasement”;

Part VIII: “When the U.S. Navy Blinked”;

Part IX: “A Navy of Saboteurs”;

Part X: “Black Supremacism in Uniform”;

Part XI: “ The Shadow Navy: White Surrender, and the Black Supremacist Takeover”; and

Part XII: “Integrating Unfit Racists into This Man's Navy.”



Re-posted by Nicholas Stix


B. THE "CONSTELLATION" INCIDENT

On July 1, 1972, the U.S.S. Constellation returned to San Diego after completing her sixth combat deployment to Southeast Asia. Under current policies, a returning ship is granted a 30-day stand-down period during which time the majority of the crew is given leave. On August 1st the ship was placed in nonoperational status while her crew and shipyard personnel performed relatively extensive repairs, overhaul and renovation. During this 2-month period there was a turnover of over 1300 personnel in the crew, with over 900 new men reporting aboard for duty. On October 4th the ship commenced refresher training, putting to sea to test the new equipment and to train the new personnel.


Clandestine meeting

Late at night on the seventeenth, a group of blacks held a clandestine meeting in the ship's barbershop. The next day an open meeting was held on the portion of the after messdecks known as "sidewalk cafe". The Executive Officer (XO) attended this meeting at the Commanding Officer's (CO) suggestion. He entered into the discussion which at this time, were no more than general gripe sessions. No specific grievances were aired and no indications of possible trouble were noted. The CO decided that, in order to prevent these meetings from becoming covert, no action would be taken to prevent further meetings but surveillance of all future meetings would be closely maintained. Between the 20th and 30th of October, while the ship conducted air wing training at sea, a series of meetings were held in the "sidewalk cafe." During these meetings the blacks organized, elected representatives and assigned specific functions to members of their group. One of these functions, as so-called "legal counsel," entailed an examination of the ship's records of Non-Judicial Punishment (NJP), also known as Captain's Mast, to determine where racial discrimination had occurred.

On November 1st, the CO directed that the XO personally attend that day's meeting. There the formalization of grievances occurred but, still, no specific complaints were aired which could have been resolved by command action. While dispersing from this meeting, an unidentified group of blacks assaulted a white messcook, fracturing his jaw.

The next day the CO identified approximately 15 sailors as "agitators" and directed the XO to examine their personnel records to determine if any were eligible for command-initiated administrative discharge. Six apparently qualified, although further review later eliminated one of them. The personnel concerned were notified of the pending action.

At the same time it was general knowledge that the ship's company would have to be reduced by 250 men in order to accommodate the air wing personnel who would embark prior to the ship's forthcoming combat deployment. Rumors circulated throughout the ship that all 250 would be administratively discharged with less than honorable discharges and all 250 men would be black. Both rumors were false.

At about 9 a.m. the next morning, November 3rd, the XO met with two representatives of the group and was asked to announce over the PA system that he would stop the administrative discharge proceedings. The XO agreed in part to that request, circulated a "flyer" announcing the halt to administrative discharges and announced over the PA system an open meeting of the Human Resources Council (HRC) for 9 p.m. that evening

[N.S.: But if the rumor was false, he couldn’t “stop the administrative discharge proceedings.” And if five men were still due to be administratively discharged, only the CO could stop that, not the XO.]


The "sit-in"

At about noon the CO and XO were notified of a "sit-in" on the forward messdecks. The CO directed officers and senior petty officers to order their men to return to work since air evolutions had commenced. The "sit-in" broke up but the participants regrouped on the after messdecks.

At about 2:30 p.m. the Marine Reaction Force was called to the after messdeck to quell a "riot." Arriving simultaneously with the Marines, and determining that the Marine force was unnecessary, the ship's Chief Master-at-Arms ordered the Marines back to their compartment. The HCR [HRC?] members then met with the group to determine the nature of complaints. The situation remained relatively stable from then on until the official HCR meeting commenced about 9 p.m. The size of the group fluctuated between 50 and 150, with all but a few participants being black. From 9 p.m. until midnight the HCR officers and men and the personnel officer attempted to respond to the group's complaints. Even at this time, however, the grievances were too broad to be answered. [My emphasis.] No specific cases of racial discrimination, which was the group's general area of complaint, were definitely identified. The tenor of the meeting rapidly changed so that by midnight the HCR members were being subjected to considerable verbal abuse. The HCR withdrew, leaving the after messdeck to a crowd of approximately 100 sailors.

The group continued to meet, claiming that the HCR meeting had been adjourned, and soon formulated a demand for the CO's presence. This demand became the focal point from this time on. Two representatives met with the CO on the bridge and relayed the group's demand for his presence, warning that if he did not appear, members of the group might "tear up his ship." The CO refused to accede to this demand on the basis that the group was disorderly and that the conduct of flight operations required his presence on the bridge. The CO then directed that the ship be "awakened" and that senior personnel patrol the berthing compartments and passageways to preclude incidents such as had occurred aboard Kitty Hawk. He also directed that season officers and petty officers encompass the group on the after messdecks. Air operations continued until 12:30 a.m. on November 4th.


The beach detachment

Shortly thereafter the CO informed his seniors by message that he was going to put in to North Island and place the dissident group ashore as a "beach detachment". The concept of a beach detachment is normally applied to a liaison group placed ashore overseas while the ship conducts operations at sea. In this case it was to be composed of the dissident group, senior supervisory personnel and members of HCR.

At approximately 4 a.m. the CO called for an all hands muster on the flight deck in an effort to break up the sit-in. The group refused to move from the messdeck in response to that order.

At 9:00 a.m. the ship tied up at North Island and the CO directed that "all those who wish to join this group" would be put ashore. At this time personnel from the air station and staff of the Commander Naval Air Forces Pacific met with the CO. Within the hour, and at the advice of the staff personnel, the CO met with dissident sailors. Contrary to the advice of the staff, however, the CO refused to keep the men aboard his ship. At this point in time the dissident group had not yet formalized its demands.

[The CO was right; the staff personnel were fools and weaklings.]

The beach detachment was put shore and, early the next morning, the ship put back to sea. Over the next several days the beach detachment and various staff personnel met to resolve the grievances. The ship, which had returned to port to off-load a damaged aircraft and had put to sea again, was then directed by the fleet commander to return to port in order for the CO to become personally involved in the discussions. During this period a series of telephone calls were placed between the Chief of Naval Operations, the Commander-in-Chief Pacific Fleet and the Commander Naval Air Forces Pacific during which information, advice and decisions with regard to the situation were passed.

On November 8th the CO met the group and received their demands: (1) That a review of nonjudicial punishment be conducted to determine whether he had discriminated against blacks; (2) that a review of administrative discharges be conducted for the same purpose; and (3) that all personnel involved in the incident aboard Constellation be received back aboard and not prosecuted for their actions. The CO agreed to the three demands with one exception: all personnel who were involved in prior offenses or who might have committed assault during the night of 3-4 November, would not be immune to prosecution. He then ordered the men to return aboard Constellation at the conclusion of normal overnight liberty.

Unauthorized absence

The following morning the group refused to board the ship but instead mustered on the pier. They were allegedly acting on advice from an unidentified high-level source in the Pentagon that such a muster would preclude their being charged with unauthorized absence. If such advice was given, it was erroneous. The ship then advised the men of their unauthorized absentee status and, at 9 a.m., they were transported back to the barracks.

At approximately 2 p.m., the men were informed that they had been transferred to North Island in a disciplinary status and that the charge against them would be 6 hours' unauthorized absence. A total of 122 men transferred.


6 comments:

Anonymous said...

jerry pdx
The black "Dylan Roof"??? I don't even remember hearing about this story: https://www.foxnews.com/us/tennessee-church-gunman-white-congregants-charleston-massacre
He only killed one but it doesn't appear to be from a lack of trying. He's just a Dylan Roof with lousy aim.

Anonymous said...

If MSNBC and CNN were around then,it would be constant headlines of "Marines are racist" or Twitter would overwhelm the story to the point of COs and XOs having to resign and blacks assigned to those posts.
Sharpton and Jesse Jackson would jump on board and Lesta as well,exacerbating the situation--and ignoring the facts of black mutiny.
"Blacks with legitimate grievances are being unfairly arrested on the Kitty Hawk and Constitution,as we speak tonight.Let's go to Miguel Almaguere..."
"Lester,tensions are running high and many are calling for the replacements of white commanders on two US vessels."
Video would follow,tilted against the white crew.
Etc etc.
--GR Anonymous

Anonymous said...

I stand corrected,the XO was black--Lesta would say he could stay and get a promotion.
--GRA

Anonymous said...

BLACK KILLS WIFE OVER CIGARETTES,40 MILES WEST OF GRAND RAPIDS.
MUSKEGON HEIGHTS, Mich. (WOOD) — Muskegon County prosecutors are identifying the man accused of killing his wife after a fight over smoking.

Vashon Flowers, 46, is facing an open murder charge in connection to Muskegon Heights’ first homicide of 2019, Muskegon County Chief Assistant Prosecutor Tim Maat confirmed. He says Flowers will also be charged as a habitual offender, with four or more prior offenses.

Muskegon Heights Police Chief Joseph Thomas confirmed the man shot and killed his wife around 6:40 a.m. Sunday in the 3100 block of Mona Street.

Investigators say the couple were fighting several hours before the shooting after the husband showed up at the home with cigarettes. The two previously agreed to quit smoking, detectives said.

The fight escalated and the husband packed belongings and left the home, Thomas said.

Hours later, the husband returned to the home and shot his wife four times in the chest, according to the police chief.

Investigators found the shooter in Muskegon several hours after the crime. Investigators suspect he had been drinking before the shooting, Thomas said.

Police have not released the victim’s name, but the police chief said she is in her 40s or 50s.

Flowers' criminal history dates back to 1992, when he was convicted of misdemeanor aggravated assault, state records show. Other convictions involved drugs, weapons, resisting an officer, assault with a dangerous weapon and several other assault convictions, including assaulting a pregnant woman.
GRA:A keeper huh? (Until he kills you).
--GR Anonymous

Anonymous said...

A LITTLE WHITE MUTINY IN NEW YORK CITY
Authored by Dave Huber via The College Fix,

The chancellor of the Big Apple’s schools stands accused of creating an atmosphere “which is hostile toward whites,” according to city Department of Education insiders.




A quartet of veteran DOE white female executives is set to sue the city due to Chancellor Richard Carranza’s “sweeping reorganization” which “pushed aside” Caucasians.

According to the New York Post, Carranza’s reforms allegedly favored less qualified minorities over experienced whites. A source told the Post that “There’s a toxic whiteness concept going on […] decisions are being made because DOE leadership believes that skin color plays a role in how to get equity — that white people can’t convey the message.”

Sources claim that under Carranza, whites have been told “they must give up power or lose responsibilities no matter how well they have performed.”
GRA:Which court and which judge will these whites take the case to?In NYC,can they get a fair trial?
The snowball(which is white people getting eliminated from the future of our country--on a sector by sector basis)rolling down the hill,getting bigger and bigger and gaining momentum,needs to be derailed.
Will one lawsuit do the trick?No,but at least SOME whites are fighting back.A nascent seedling in the ground,that needs much more planting for whites to reap the benefit.
--GR Anonymous--I'm a white man

jeigheff said...

The dissident sailors deserved full "Robinson Crusoe" treatment, being marooned on a desolate island with scant supplies where their survival skills would have tested to the full. There are places like that where one man MIGHT live, let alone a hundred. The Navy could then have belatedly "remembered" the mutineers and picked them up, a year or two later, whatever. The survivors surely would have had an improvement in attitude.