bLACK ANCHOR ON cbs news:Tonight,all the reporters on cbs evening news called James Brown,"J.B."(I'm don't remember anyone referring to Walter Cronkite as "W.C.")
GRA:He isn't a possible replacement for Nora O'Donnell,as he's pushing 73,but I watched the half hour wondering if the cbs reporters were instructed beforehand to call him "J.B.",in their conversations with him on-air.
"You're right,J.B." "That's true,J.B." "J.B.,an innocent black man was released from prison today--right on,J.B."
How many innocently convicted black men does that make though,J.B.(50?)as opposed to the number of black felons who go scotfree--and NEVER go to prison(tens of thousands)because no one in the "black community" will squeal on their murderous negro acquaintances?
The shaman character took a plea deal and was sentenced to a shocking 41 months -- if it turns out that not sharing the video affects his case, he ought to get a new lawyer.
But the video is not really exculpatory.
Most Jan 6 defendants are charged with two main offenses: 1) unauthorized presence in the Capitol, and 2) obstruction of an official proceeding.
Being present in the Capitol is probably seen as de facto evidence of both, since it's claimed the mass invasion is what obstructed the official proceeding -- anyone guilty of unauthorized presence is also guilty of obstruction.
So in the above sense, the video is not exculpatory -- he was present in the Capitol, and his presence, along with the presence of many others, is blamed for the obstruction of official business.
Some faced more serious charges, e.g. assault and sedition.
Of course the behavior of the vast majority of those who entered the Capitol was harmless, but they were hunted down and arrested anyway.
So it's all complete bullshit, and if the prosecutors were fair-minded and interested in justice, instead of partisan shock troops for the regime, they would not have maliciously charged these people so aggressively -- and if the judiciary was impartial, most of the charges would have been dismissed or reduced to e.g. a single misdemeanor count of trespassing: pay a fine and that's it -- but the judges are corrupt too -- they are statist sycophants who are more interested in demonstrating their fealty to the regime.
The issue here is the malevolence of the regime -- there is no fix for this except wholesale change of the people in charge -- you still have people in politics and the media saying it was a 'deadly attack' -- just yesterday the curly haired dyke nigger press secretary said it was 'a violent attack that cost police officers their lives', the latter being a lie -- even GOP politicians are still saying the killing of Ashli Babbitt was justified -- there is no fix for that kind of pure lying malevolence.
I don't expect the release of the surveillance video to make much difference in the legal fallout -- reasonable people knew from the beginning it wasn't an 'insurrection' -- but you're not dealing with reasonable people.
That is like the evidence the FBI had in the Rittenhouse case. They had video of the whole thing occurring but the prosecutors waited until three days before they trial to turn over the tapes to the defense. And then it was lof-def version of the video.
I am a dissident journalist, whose work has been published in dozens of daily newspapers, magazines, and journals in English, German, and Swedish, under my own name and many pseudonyms. While living in internal exile in New York, where I am whitelisted, I maintain NSU/The Wyatt Earp Journalism Bureau and some eight other blogs (some are distinctive but occasional venues, while others are mirrors), and also write for stout-hearted men such as Peter Brimelow and Jared Taylor. Please hit the “Donate” button on your way out. Thanks, in advance.
Follow my tweets at @NicholasStix.
5 comments:
The only sound you hear from msm/politicians is how Tucker needs to be fired.
Looks like they're all in on it.
--GRA
bLACK ANCHOR ON cbs news:Tonight,all the reporters on cbs evening news called James Brown,"J.B."(I'm don't remember anyone referring to Walter Cronkite as "W.C.")
GRA:He isn't a possible replacement for Nora O'Donnell,as he's pushing 73,but I watched the half hour wondering if the cbs reporters were instructed beforehand to call him "J.B.",in their conversations with him on-air.
"You're right,J.B."
"That's true,J.B."
"J.B.,an innocent black man was released from prison today--right on,J.B."
How many innocently convicted black men does that make though,J.B.(50?)as opposed to the number of black felons who go scotfree--and NEVER go to prison(tens of thousands)because no one in the "black community" will squeal on their murderous negro acquaintances?
What do you think,J.B.?
--GRA
The shaman character took a plea deal and was sentenced to a shocking 41 months -- if it turns out that not sharing the video affects his case, he ought to get a new lawyer.
But the video is not really exculpatory.
Most Jan 6 defendants are charged with two main offenses: 1) unauthorized presence in the Capitol, and 2) obstruction of an official proceeding.
Being present in the Capitol is probably seen as de facto evidence of both, since it's claimed the mass invasion is what obstructed the official proceeding -- anyone guilty of unauthorized presence is also guilty of obstruction.
So in the above sense, the video is not exculpatory -- he was present in the Capitol, and his presence, along with the presence of many others, is blamed for the obstruction of official business.
Some faced more serious charges, e.g. assault and sedition.
Of course the behavior of the vast majority of those who entered the Capitol was harmless, but they were hunted down and arrested anyway.
So it's all complete bullshit, and if the prosecutors were fair-minded and interested in justice, instead of partisan shock troops for the regime, they would not have maliciously charged these people so aggressively -- and if the judiciary was impartial, most of the charges would have been dismissed or reduced to e.g. a single misdemeanor count of trespassing: pay a fine and that's it -- but the judges are corrupt too -- they are statist sycophants who are more interested in demonstrating their fealty to the regime.
The issue here is the malevolence of the regime -- there is no fix for this except wholesale change of the people in charge -- you still have people in politics and the media saying it was a 'deadly attack' -- just yesterday the curly haired dyke nigger press secretary said it was 'a violent attack that cost police officers their lives', the latter being a lie -- even GOP politicians are still saying the killing of Ashli Babbitt was justified -- there is no fix for that kind of pure lying malevolence.
I don't expect the release of the surveillance video to make much difference in the legal fallout -- reasonable people knew from the beginning it wasn't an 'insurrection' -- but you're not dealing with reasonable people.
I don't think it even needs to be exculpatory. They need to turn over everything they have, exculpatory or not. But I am not sure.
That is like the evidence the FBI had in the Rittenhouse case. They had video of the whole thing occurring but the prosecutors waited until three days before they trial to turn over the tapes to the defense. And then it was lof-def version of the video.
Post a Comment