Saturday, March 24, 2012

Trayvon Martin Case: Real Eyewitness Supports Zimmerman’s Story, as Opposed to Lynch Mob’s Fake Eyewitnesses

Trayvon Martin, l, and George Zimmerman

By Nicholas Stix

The phony case against George Zimmerman has been based on lies, the three biggest of which have been:

1. That because Zimmerman did not follow the orders of a 911 operator that he was guilty of murder;
2. That Zimmerman can be arrested, and the courts left to sort things out, despite the fact that he hadn’t broken any laws; and
3. That the “eyewitness” accounts of Mary Cutcher and her friend Selma Mora Lamilla condemn Zimmerman.

The truth is that Zimmerman wasn’t talking to a 911 operator—he had called a non-emergency number—and he was under no obligation, in any case, to follow the operator’s advice to back off. No one can be lawfully arrested in this country who has not broken any laws. The courts don’t get to “sort things out” where no crime has been committed. Finally, Cutcher and Lamilla were not eyewitnesses to anything, and their highly embellished, dramatically changed accounts ultimately implicate themselves, as being guilty of bearing false witness, not Zimmerman of murder.

It is understandable that while fake “eyewitness” Mary Cutcher has been running around from one media interview to another, insisting that she had avoided the media, the real eyewitness, John, would refuse to show his face on camera, or give his last name: While Cutcher and her fellow fraud, Lamilla, are heroes to the lynch mob, the real eyewitness’ life is in danger.


Trayvon Martin's parent's Tracy Martin, left, and Sybrina Fulton, center, during the riot held in their honor at New York City’s Union Square on Wednesday, March 21, 2012 (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer)

One day that eyewitness may have to testify in a court setting, giving his real name, with his face visible, but protecting him for now serves the interests of justice because, unlike the coached “testimony” of Martin’s secret girlfriend, John’s testimony is not being used to illegally deprive anyone of his life or liberty.

Benjamin Crump, liar, er, lawyer, for Trayvon Martin's parents, at his March 21 press conference

Trayvon Martin, who was 6’3” at the time of his death, in a very old family photo, that has been used to make him seem small, cute, and harmless

* * *

Witness: Martin attacked Zimmerman:

Witness: Martin attacked Zimmerman
Friday, 23 March 2012, 5:47 p.m. EDT
Updated: Friday, 23 March 2012, 6:19 p.m. EDT
Fox Tampa Bay

ORLANDO - A witness we haven't heard from before paints a much different picture than we've seen so far of what happened the night 17-year-old Trayvon Martin was shot and killed.

The night of that shooting, police say there was a witness who saw it all.

Our sister station, FOX 35 in Orlando, has spoken to that witness.

What Sanford Police investigators have in the folder, they put together on the killing of Trayvon Martin few know about.

The file now sits in the hands of the state attorney. Now that file is just weeks away from being opened to a grand jury.

It shows more now about why police believed that night that George Zimmerman shouldn't have gone to jail.

Zimmerman called 911 and told dispatchers he was following a teen. The dispatcher told Zimmerman not to.

And from that moment to the shooting, details are few.

But one man's testimony could be key for the police.

"The guy on the bottom who had a red sweater on was yelling to me: 'help, help…and I told him to stop and I was calling 911," he said.

Trayvon Martin was in a hoodie; Zimmerman was in red.

The witness only wanted to be identified as "John," and didn't not want to be shown on camera.

His statements to police were instrumental, because police backed up Zimmerman's claims, saying those screams on the 911 call are those of Zimmerman.

"When I got upstairs and looked down, the guy who was on top beating up the other guy, was the one laying in the grass, and I believe he was dead at that point," John said.

Zimmerman says the shooting was self defense. According to information released on the Sanford city website, Zimmerman said he was going back to his SUV when he was attacked by the teen.

Sanford police say Zimmerman was bloody in his face and head, and the back of his shirt was wet and had grass stains, indicating a struggle took place before the shooting.

Hoax/lynch mob leader Al Sharpton, l, with his protégé, Tawana Brawley (who now calls herself Maryam Muhammad), circa 1988

[Thanks to reader-researcher “W” for this report.

Previously, on the Trayvon Martin case, at WEJB/NSU:

“Sanford, Florida: Black ‘Little Boy,’Trayvon Martin 17, Beat White ‘Vigilante’ George Zimmerman Bloody; Zimmerman Shot Martin Dead; Now Black WFTV ‘Reporter,’ Daralene Jones, Black Supremacists, and White Aunt Jemima Earwitness Demand That Zimmerman be Arrested”;

“Trayvon Martin: ABC ‘News’ Gets on Bandwagon, Acting as Martin’s Family Mouthpiece; Family Lawyer Refuses to Release All Information about Teen’s Last Phone Call to Girlfriend, but Insists That It Requires That George Zimmerman be Arrested ‘Right Now’”;

“Arrest First, Investigate Later: Press Conference by Lawyer Benjamin Crump, of Trayvon Martin’s Family, Seeks Through Violation of Due Process… to Railroad George Zimmerman”;

“News Coverage of the Trayvon Martin Case Keeps Getting Worse: New York Daily News Passes Off ABC News Hearsay as ‘Interview,’ While Changing the Hearsay!”;

“USA Today: ‘In wake of black teen Trayvon Martin's death, USA is soul-searching’; McPaper Invokes Jena 6, Quotes Al Sharpton, Self-Described ‘ThugNiggaIntellectual’ Mark Neal, and Jena Attacker Theo Shaw as Moral Authorities”;

“Why the Secret ‘Interview’ with Trayvon Martin’s Secret Girlfriend is Bogus, and His Alleged Last Cell Phone Call is Insignificant”;

“Another Trayvon Martin Supporter: Florida Atlantic U. Hate Crime Attacker Jonatha Carr Had Just been Interviewed about the Jena Six/Nuremberg-Style Rally She’s been Organizing; CBS12 News Tries to Rationalize Her Crimes”;

“Trayvon Martin’s Parents Attend New York City Riot Held on Their Behalf”

“Associated Press and Penn Live: Arrest George Zimmerman for Killing Trayvon Martin, the Law be Damned! Let Zimmerman Prove His Innocence in Court!”

National Review ‘Conservative’ Rich Lowry Goes to Bat for Al Sharpton in Trayvon Martin Case, Ignoring or Misrepresenting Facts of the Case.”]



Anonymous said...

The video about the eyewitness who went upstairs to call 911 should be posted on YouTube. It could go viral.

Anonymous said...

Your an Idiot if you believe this bull

hiphop.angel said...

Oh okay, first you say it was a non-emergency number he called that told him not to follow him then later you said it was 911. Which is it? This story is bogus! I find it hard to believe that a fat man with a gun was letting a sweet, young, defenseless boy beat him.

Anonymous said...

Zimmerman was attacked? Where are the marks/bruises/cuts from the attack then you piece of shit? FUCKING BOGUS ALL OF IT

Anonymous said...

If it is reasonable that Zimmerman once the confrontation did not go his way felt threatened for his life enough to use deadly force, why isn't the same assumption given to Martin who was minding his own business and being stalked by someone we now know had a gun, a police history, and an ability to shoot and kill?

Couldn't Martin's actions be construed as stand your ground also?

And if so, would not the ulimate blame be placed on the person who caused the confrontation to develop since both obviously felt threatened for their lives?

Hannah H said...

Thank you, thank you, THANK YOU, for looking at ZIMMERMAN'S side.
and honestly, I can't say whether or not EITHER of them we're innocent, because I was never THERE. I was NEVER in it. But I must say, EVERY story has TWO SIDES, and they MUST be looked at.
Thank you, thank you, thank you!

Hannah H said...

First of all, Nicholas Stix wrote says it was a non-emergency number.
Then he gives the account of a NEWS STATION, which says that it was "911".
And sweet, young, innocent boy? HOW DO YOU KNOW? From what I've read, Mr. Innocent-looking-cutie-pie had gotten into a good deal of trouble before these events. That picture you've been seeing all over the web, pretty much the ONLY one of him? That was when he was TWELVE. He was SEVENTEEN when he was shot. Isn't weird that the family couldn't show a RECENT, picture- within 5 years? Come on, now. Use your brain.
I'm not saying Zimmerman was an angel- I really don't think he was..but Tray wasn't either. Don't call ANYONE sweet and innocent when you don't even know.

Anonymous said...

@Hannah H: girrl shut up because Zimmerman had a bad past two. and if zimmerman wasnt following him in the first place trayvon wouldnt have never been dead. the police told him not to follow and he did anyways. even if trayvon hit him first its still self defence he was minding his own buisness and a dood was stalking him cause of the clothes he was wearing and the color he was . so once again shut up!!

Anonymous said...

This message is for the racist bigot Hannah H. This moron says that there are two sides to every story, but what they fail to realize is that if someone is murdered without any legitimate eyewitness then there is only one side. Since there is no real eyewitness you need to look at the available evidence, and from that evidence we can only know a few facts. One, Trayvon Martin was minding his own business, and doing nothing wrong at the time, when someone, suspiciously, started following him. Secondly, Zimmerman stalked Trayvon after being informed from 911 dispatch not to. Third, a 17 BOY is dead from a gunshot wound from Zimmerman's pistol, and regardless what that boy looks like he is that, a boy. Also, according to Florida law Trayvon is definitely a boy until 18 years old. How can it be defended under a "stand your ground defense" when Zimmerman is the sole agressor from the beginning? You also need to ask yourself another thing, Hannah. If it seems odd to you that Trayvon's picture is suspicious because it's from 4 years ago, he's actually 13 in the picture, then why is it not suspicious that Zimmerman's picture is from 2005? If you have seen the new video from the police station you can clearly see that Zimmerman is not the fat slothy looking person from his mugshot 7 years ago. Come on, use your brain, or lack thereof. Maybe Zimmerman's attorney is trying to make him appear too weak and pathetic to attack anyone who is 6'3". I'd like to also point out that there is a difference between the words we're and were. Go back to school and maybe you'll learn enough to not be an close-minded bigot. I'd also like to add that I have worked in Florida as a Firefighter/EMT and I have no idea what non-emergency numbers a resident can call in case of an emergency. Maybe Seminole County does things differently than the rest of the country.

Anonymous said...

Did anyone notice Mary Cutcher said that it was a BLACK man standing over Trayvon AFTER the shooting in her 911 call? She couldn't even get the facts right when she was looking outside...

Mary Cutcher 911 call

Anonymous said...

When someone pulls the race card it means they have no valid argument...every black man isn't a criminal and every white man isn't a racist! Ever heard of being TOO emotional?! They blind you to the facts and Al Sharpton the Race Baiter feeds on that too keep us divided! If not he wouldn't have a job!

have some sense said...

To the anonymous that called Hanna H a bigot: There was an eyewitness and he placed Martin on top of Zimmerman and assaulting him, or did you forget that part already.

This whole trayvon thing is getting out of hand. The media has made this into something it is not, for ratings. everyone is calling for justice for this kid saying zimmerman needs locked up. Do you guys not realize that this IS HOW the justice system is SUPPOSED to work?? innocent until PROVEN guilty!! if it were the other way around and the kid was the shooter and was arrested, they would be screaming that it was self defense and he was only arrested because of his race. they dont have enough evidence to charge him. there are conflicting witness reports that only HEARD the fight and did not actually see it, and the ONE MAN who did actually see the fight is the ONLY eye witness WHO SAID HE SAW the kid on top of zimmerman beating him.
the news is showing photos of the kid from 5 years ago in an attempt to show him as an innocent youth incapable of starting a fight when in reality he was a nearly 200 lbs and over 6 ft tall athelete. all of these internet vigilantes calling for the shooters blood only have what twisted info they have had hand fed to them by a media who couldn't care less of the outcome but know if they make this a race white on black issue they'll get ratings. They are using this whole situation for profit and yet no one see it?? zimmerman isnt even white! so how the hell is this a white on black " hate crime?" last I heard "az$hole" applied to any race. until there is enough evidence to charge him with a crime, which as it stands there is not, there will not be an arrest.
it clearly states in the first 911 call that the kid was approaching him BEFORE zimmerman follows him. turning and running when someone calls the police on you is acting suspicious. I'm not saying the kid deserved to die. zimmerman as a neighborhood watch man should not have been carrying a gun. but in a state that has a stand your ground law, if you feel you are in fear of your life you have the right to use force to protect yourself. and until they can prove who started it there will be no charges filed. yes zimmerman followed him, and felt that due to the recent crimes in his neighborhood he felt that was in his responsibility as a watchman to report and have the information of this teens location to give to the police, something he cant do unless he follows from a distance, which is what he did. it clearly stated in the un edited 911 call that the teen was approaching him and not the other way around. the only eyewitness states that he saw the teen was on top of zimmerman and attacking him. zimmerman did not offer up that the man was black...the dispatcher ASKED HIM what the teens race was and he answered.
The way the media is editing these tapes, and showing outdated 5 year old pictures is noting more than an attempt to fuel a racial fire for ratings. they wont show a current picture of him dressed wile a thug or make mention of his twitter nickname of “NO_LIMIT_NI**A,” because then the innocent little child claim would been lost. Just like they wont mention the school suspensions or stolen jewelry he was found with to warrant the suspension. they are twisting this story like a rope for ratings and its disgusting. did the kid have to die? no. can a man be arrested without proof? no. is the media being honest?? HA! no!

Reuben said...

The writer of this bullshit right here is a racist, what the fuck do you mean by using a picture to make Trayvon look innocent? How old is Trayvon? How old is Zimmerman? Are you telling me that Zimmerman had no other option but to shoot Tray? Look how fat he is for Christ's sake, 1 punch from Zimmerman could knock Tray out but no the fool had to shoot the kid and for that he should go to jail, no debates.

Jordan said...

Its funny y'all prove our points just by your comments! Do you even read the other comments all the way or just see that they don't think Zimmerman is guilty so you attack them as racists, bigots or idiots?! Its a fact that black people are too emotional as a race and they let those emotions take over in these situations. Al Sharpton, Jessi Jackson and even our own president are just race baiters and it is their job to keep us divided! White on Black Hate Crime?! Ha what a joke! Zimmerman is Hispanic! Its sad the things people will do and take advantage of to further their own agenda.

Anonymous said...

Finally a blog that exposes the truth!!! I'm so sick of the racial card. Now we have a President that plays that "racial" card too. Once Martin's true character is exposed and his past run'in's with law enforcement are revealed, the public will see Martin for what he really is.....another getto juvenile delinqent. Did he deserve to die? No, he didn't, but portraying his as a young, innocent child is repulsive.

Douglas J. Bender said...

It's amazing to me how many blind, ignorant, overly emotional, stupid, or just plain lying people there are out there who can so easily claim Zimmerman's guilt and Martin's innocence in the face of all the facts indicating the contrary. And to think that these people can vote.

Jordan said...

Its kind of ironic that the only people who have "lynch" mobs these days are black...

Anonymous said...

Can someone explain me why people are called 'racist', solely because they choose the side of Zimmerman?

I think America is a wonderful country but I'm glad I live in The Netherlands. There are not so many race card-pullers here if you understand what I mean. My God they are so pathetic!