-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Berenson from Unreported Truths <alexberenson@substack.com>
To: add1dda@aol.com
thu, mar 23, 2023 5:00 p.m.
From: Alex Berenson from Unreported Truths <alexberenson@substack.com>
To: add1dda@aol.com
thu, mar 23, 2023 5:00 p.m.
URGENT: The newest effort to claim Sars-Cov-2 has natural origins is even more cynical than it first seems
URGENT: The newest effort to claim Sars-Cov-2 has natural origins is even more cynical than it first seems 
URGENT: The newest effort to claim Sars-Cov-2 has natural origins is even more cynical than it first seemsAnd the scientists involved with this charade must know the truth, because they know raccoon dogs are a near-impossible animal host - and what real evidence of a natural virus would look like.
(NOTE TO READERS: THIS PIECE TURNED OUT LONG. I TRY TO WRITE SHORT, BUT I WANTED TO TAKE THE TIME TO LAY OUT THE TIMELINE AND FACTS CONCLUSIVELY. I HOPE YOU THINK THEY ARE AS COMPELLING AS I DO…) — I am not making this up. Last week, The Atlantic hyped a new research preprint as the "Strongest Evidence Yet That an Animal Started the Pandemic." That in late 2019 raccoon dogs shit (or bled, or maybe sneezed) at the market in Wuhan where they were sold for slaughter. And that human beings were infected with Sars-Cov-2 at the same market. That's it. By the way, these raccoon dogs that the paper's authors want to blame for the epidemic? They have never - as in, not once - been found to be infected with Sars-Cov-2 in the real world. Not making that part up either. This new preprint is the scientific equivalent of Alex Murdaugh's decision to take the stand at his double-murder trial last month. Murdaugh was arrogant enough to believe he could outsmart the jury, but as soon as he started dry-crying about "Pawpaw," he might as well have put the cuffs on himself. He should just have kept his mouth shut. (A raccoon dog. Not a raccoon. Not quite a dog. Also probably not the source of Sars-Cov-2.)
Worst of all, the people who ginned up this nonsense know exactly what they're doing. They know what strong evidence of animal origins of Sars-Cov-2 would look like. How can I be so sure? Because we have been through this drill before, with the original SARS. So what would strong evidence of animal origins be? What are we getting instead? And how did we get here? (ANSWERS BELOW, PAYWALLED FOR 72 HOURS - OR SIGN UP FOR A TRIAL AND READ THEM NOW.)... |
 | |
|
3 comments:
Where did it go?The vaxx wore off for millions and yet no pandemic this winter.I heard in October there was going the most horrific "double pandemic" of flu and Covid,but...
NOTHING.
--GRA
Granted the Chinese do eat a lot of strange stuff and keep those wet markets so everything can be bought fresh. This whole Covid thing will be studied for decades to come and no 100 % sure answer of where the virus originated.
Many experts say that Covid was obviously created in a lab. Now we know that Fauci funded gain-of-function experiments in the Wuhan lab to modify a virus to make it more dangerous. It is past time to indict Fauci for creating the pandemic and for his efforts to prevent existing drugs, including ivermectin, from being used to prevent Covid and save lives of those who caught it. Then He promoted the dangerous fake vaccine which appears to have killed more people than Covid itself. You cannot believe anything from the CDC, but foreign numbers indicate what really happened. German data shows vaxxed people 8 times more apt to catch Covid. Numbers from Britain show that all-cause mortality is higher among the vaxxed than the unvaxxed at every age level. Why are Fauci and his fellow criminals still on the loose?
Post a Comment