Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation – The Supreme Court will soon decide if it will consider a challenge by Missouri and nine other states to the Covid-19 "vaccine" mandate imposed on the health care sector. Ten states* have filed a petition of certiorari asking the High Court to take a second look at the legality of the mandate. The amicus brief, Missouri v. Biden, being filed on June 21, will encourage the Supreme Court to grant certiorari.
The Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation will be a petitioner in the amicus brief arguing that the federal government has no constitutional or natural law authority to force medical treatments on Americans. The law firm of William J. Olson, P.C. Attorney At Law is preparing the brief.
A key issue in this case is whether or not the imposition of a vaccine mandate is a proper function of the federal government.
Some of the main points to be discussed in the brief are:
1. Whether the vaccine mandate is in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) because is arbitrary, capricious, and unlawful?
2. Whether the mandate is unconstitutional under the Spending Clause, the anti-commandeering doctrine, and the Tenth Amendment?
3. Whether the mandate violates the APA because it was issued without notice and comment?
4. Whether the mandate exceeds the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) statutory authority?
From 1965 until 2021, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services never required any vaccinations for health care staff. However a major shift occurred on September 9, 2021 when President Biden announced multiple vaccine mandates. CMS followed suit on November 5, 2021 imposing a vaccine mandate on nearly all healthcare workers at facilities that receive Medicare.
Since that time, thousands of health care workers in America have been negatively impacted by Medicare's mandatory vaccine mandate. Some have lost their jobs by not complying. Some have quit instead of complying. FGF seeks to educate the public on this issue. Do doctors, nurses and healthcare professionals have the right to make their own health care decisions? Is this mandate constitutional? Is it a proper function of government to impose such a mandate on its citizens?
The Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation is a nonprofit established for the purpose of participating in the public policy process, and informing and educating the public on the rights of citizens and questions related to the human and civil rights secured by law. We have a deep interest in protecting constitutional checks and balances established in the U.S. Constitution. The vaccine mandate is one of the most important liberty issues of our day.
If you would like to help FGF with the costs involved with this Missouri v. Biden amicus brief, please consider a donation.
Any amount will be appreciated and used solely for this cause.
As the amicus will be filed on Tuesday, June 21, please respond as soon as possible with your donation or pledge.
Thank you very much for your support!
*The nine other states joining Missouri in this suit are Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming.
** See William J. Olson, P.C.'s website Law and Freedom which has summaries of many of the important Supreme Court cases in which the William Olson attorneys have been involved. The Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation has joined as a petitioner in a number of their cases over the past several years, including most recently Heltzel v. Youngkin, which challenged the removal by former Governor Ralph Northam of the Robert E. Lee monument in Richmond, Virginia.
Copyright 2022 by the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation and Fran Griffin. You may link to this article at websites and social media.
Help the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation with the costs for preparing and filing the amicus brief, Missouri v. Biden here.
Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation
344 Maple Avenue West, #281
Vienna, Virginia 22180
fgfBooks.com
publishing@fgfBooks.com
1-877-726-0058
***
2 comments:
FGF--is that similar to FJB--except insert George floyd,instead of Biden?
Asking for an autistic friend.
--GRA
UNNECESSARY VAXXES FOR KIDS READY FOR INJECTION
WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal health officials said Sunday that kid-sizes doses of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccines appear to be safe and effective for kids under 5, a key step toward a long-awaited decision to begin vaccinating the youngest American children.
The Food and Drug Administration posted its analysis of the Pfizer shot ahead of a Wednesday meeting where outside experts will vote on whether the shots are ready for the nation’s 18 million babies, toddlers and preschoolers. Kids under 5 are the only group not yet eligible for COVID-19 vaccination in the U.S.
Late last week the FDA posted a similar analysis of Moderna’s shots for children under 6.
If regulators clear the shots by one or both companies, vaccinations could begin as soon as next week with the drugmakers ready to rapidly ship doses ordered by the government. Parents have been pressing federal officials for months for the opportunity to protect their smallest children as more adults shed masks and abandon other public health precautions.
(GRA:Is that fabrication possibly true? Parents are clamoring for vaxxes for their just born kids?)
While only about 3% of U.S. COVID cases are in the age group 6 months to 4 years, hospitalization and death rates in that group are higher than those for older children, according to the FDA’s analysis — one reason experts have said protecting this group is important.
GRA:None of that paragraph made any sense.If true,why vaxx "older children then?"That's called having it both ways--which the drug companies also call--DOUBLE OUR PROFITS.
--GRA
Post a Comment