By N.S.
“Kyle Rittenhouse’s attorney Mark Richards slammed President Biden for calling the now jury-cleared 18-year-old a 'white supremacist’ and saying things ‘so incorrect and untrue’ about his client on the campaign trail….”
“Jury-cleared” is a new one on me. The English legal terms are “acquitted” and “exonerated.” The implication is that Rittenhouse is really guilty, but somehow got one over on the jury.
new york post operative Callie Patteson and her editors clearly were rooting for blm, and for an American hero, guilty of no crime, to be railroaded. Callie Patteson—remember that name!
Keep in mind here, that we're talking about people who have no problem in falsely speaking of the racist, Central Park Five rapists as having been "exonerated," when in fact they never have been. (Their convictions and sentences were "vacated," which is a completely different matter.) Sounds mighty racist to me. Well, that's Lachlan Murdoch's post for you.
“‘Joe Biden needs to publicly apologize to Kyle Rittenhouse,’ Sen. Tom Cotton tweeted following the verdict.”
The real American hero needs to sue the fake president for defamation.
"Rittenhouse Lawyer Slams Biden for Calling Teen ‘White Supremacist’"
https://nypost.com/2021/11/19/rittenhouse-lawyer-slams-biden-for-calling-teen-white-supremacist/
1 comment:
>Callie Patteson—remember that name!
Better still, save/archive anything possibly libelous or defamatory published by her about Rittenhouse.
In the aftermath of the verdict, many women are being especially idiotic and hysterical in the things they say about Rittenhouse, e.g. repeating the same exaggerated lies about him and what he did.
Post a Comment