By N.S.
“So-Called ‘experts’ Warn against Calling Mass Burglary Events ‘Looting’”
“‘Looting’ has been deemed a racially-charged term by progressive voices as opponents of the label are pushing to call the criminal act ‘organized robbery.’”
https://thepostmillennial.com/experts-warn-not-to-call-mass-burglary-events-looting
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
It's anarchy mixed with black disregard for White law.
--GRA
I have no problem with the term 'organized robbery' instead of 'looting', as long as 'organized robbery' is allowed to also become 'racially-charged' by consistently naming the race/ethnicity of the perpetrators, which is generally obvious (actually the term is probably already 'racially-charged' in the minds of everyone except 'experts' and media faggots).
I saw a recent story where an adult male (21 y/o as I recall) was arrested after using a handgun to carjack a terrified young woman -- he was also out on bond/probation at the time for a list of other offenses, which the article detailed -- so his identity was clearly known, but it was not published in the article -- I emailed the byline reporter to ask why there was no ID -- after he did not respond, I emailed an editor -- here is the editor's verbatim reply (both reporter and editor appear to be white men):
In general, we do not include the name of arrestees unless the crimes are at a level -- or the person arrested is well-known enough -- that we are confident we would follow them through the court process and report if the person is convicted or charges are dropped.
This is a policy we have adopted in recent years because of the way articles and names live on the Internet. ... It is a frequent occurrence that people contact us many years after the fact to say, "This article about my arrest shows up in Google and affects my life, but the charges were dropped." ... I don't know whether you have ever tried to follow a case through the court process. If you have -- and you may well have -- you know that while it is easy enough to find out when someone is arrested, it can be difficult to find out how the case is resolved. Often, it simply isn't worth the staff time it would take for us to track a case for certain crimes, and report on the outcome. ... With this policy, we're seeking to strike a balance between what the public needs/wants to know, and what the human impact can be of imperfect or incomplete reporting.
This is the kind of blah blah rationalizing faggotry that has reigned in the US media for several decades now.
It means crimes will be reported,ANONYM0USLY--and RACELESSLY.
Example:
"Police in Grand Rapids are investigating a murder on the SE side(which would give a clue it occurred in the black ghetto),when one 21 year old was shot in the back of the head,while leaning in a car,talking to "friends".The new policy of this website is to eliminate names and race from the stories."
However,describing the actions of the crimes can also give information:
"A 22 and 24 year old were killed on their porches today by a drive-by shooter on Madison Se(southeast side again),in an apparent drug deal gone wrong."
"A fight at a party,led to gunshots injuring a total of five people--ranging in age from 18 to 31,late last night.Police received a call of shots fired at 3:24 am(that's negro shooting time,obviously).When officers arrived,two of the victims had transported themselves to the nearest hospital,while emergency units were dispatched for the other three injured males."
Soon,they just won't report anything.
--GRA
Post a Comment