Alyssa Milano tweeted at 11:59 a.m.: “Hey, you going to comment on this, @realdonaldtrump? #AltReich”
Trump was a Nazi because some of the people who hate him managed to get on Twitter a few hours before he did that day. (He was golfing.)
Around 1 p.m., Trump began tweeting about Charlottesville, saying, among other things:
“We ALL must be united & condemn all that hate stands for. There is no place for this kind of violence in America. Lets come together as one!”
“We must remember this truth: No matter our color, creed, religion or political party, we are ALL AMERICANS FIRST.”
The actresses said: NOT GOOD ENOUGH! (Sarah Silverman: “This is on-purpose vague bc ur a wimp that stands 4 nothing ...”)
Trump’s statements were a LOT more condemnatory than any Obama statements on either the Dallas cop-killer or the Muslim who murdered 13 people at Fort Hood.
-- Obama, two days after a black supremacist gunned down five policemen during a BLM protest against the police: “I think it's very hard to untangle the motives of this shooter.”
-- Obama, the day after the massacre at Fort Hood with an assailant shouting "Allahu Akbar!” : “I would caution against jumping to conclusions until we have all the facts.”
Back to Trump's shockingly inadequate response to violence in Charlottesville. Later that day, the president reiterated the color-or-creed point and condemned the “hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides.”
Then we were off to the races! He said MANY SIDES. Q.E.D. He’s a Nazi.
That’s when twits like Marco Rubio and Mitt Romney said:
Wrong! On one side were FASCISTS and on the other, anti-fascists, who are pure of heart and cute as little puppies ... as they beat the crap out of college conservatives.
New York Times reporter Sheryl Gay Stolberg, reporting from the ground in Charlottesville, had tweeted: “The hard left seemed as hate-filled as alt-right. I saw club-wielding ‘antifa’ beating white nationalists being led out of the park.”
Trump was a monster for seeing the same antifa violence that a New York Times reporter saw. (The left went mental on Stolberg, so she deleted that tweet. Reality must not be allowed to interfere with the media's lies!)
Two days later, Trump held a press conference on Charlottesville
expressly to denounce neo-Nazis and white supremacists for the billion-and-oneth time: “Racism is evil. And those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans.”
The following day, at a press conference on infrastructure, the press had about two questions on that topic and dozens of accusatory statements on Charlottesville.
-- “Let me ask you, Mr. President, why did you wait so long to blast neo-Nazis?”
(It’s been nearly a decade since a Muslim shot up Fort Hood in Texas and we're still waiting for Obama to “blast” Nidal Malik Hasan.)
-- “Why do Nazis like you?”
(Was Obama ever asked why cop-killers liked him?)
The rest of the reporters' questions were more in the nature of “statements”:
Q: Nazis were there. Q: David Duke was there. Q: The neo-Nazis started this.
In a press conference that was -- again -- on
infrastructure, Trump spent paragraph after paragraph -- more than 200 words -- denouncing white supremacists and neo-Nazis. He condemned “hatred” and “bigotry,” called the driver of the car that killed Heather Heyer a “murderer,” and repeatedly said “the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists” were “very bad people.”
But he also said: “Not all of those people were white supremacists by any stretch. Those people were also there because they wanted to protest the taking down of a statue of Robert E. Lee.”
Trump clearly distinguished between the people “protesting very quietly the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee” and “the bad ones” -- the “neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them.”
“You had people -- and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. OK? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
“Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people. But you also had troublemakers, and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets, and with the baseball bats. You had a lot of bad people in the other group.”
Actual question from a reporter: “Sir, I just didn’t understand what you were saying. You were saying the press has treated white nationalists unfairly?”
That idiocy has now been enshrined as a canonical belief of the Democratic Party, worthy of launching a presidential campaign. Life must be great on the coasts.
.
2 comments:
Who is Coulter talking to with this argument?Who is her target audience?Trumps backers have probably ignored her for weeks,while Trump haters would never read her--period.
No convincing rabid Democrats,because THEIR definition of "good" and "bad" is different from normal people's idea of "good" and "bad.
For instance,a normal person would consider drug dealing as a crime--or "bad".
Democrats don't look at dealing, criminally.They look at it politically--like they do ALL subjects of good and evil.Drug dealing and all its implications should not be punished with prison time.It's the white man beating down the entrepreneurial black and sending him off to an overly severe sentence.
"It's free enterprise,baby.We're just givin' the people what they want."
You've heard that excuse before.
Blacks killing whites with drugs is fine with Democrats--less white voters for Trump.
Dems want to release dealers,not because they think they're innocent,but to reinforce the idea among minority voters that "whites are evil(stupid,old,racist,obsolete)"while minority pols will look out for them-and let them disregard the law.
Why?To take over all branches of government,federally and locally.
Crimes are invented for whites/Republicans where there are none("Let's impeach Trump for tweeting,golfing,trying to defend himself,telling the truth about Charlottesville")--all of which are high crimes and misdemeanors,in their fraudulent opinions(They can't HONESTLY believe their own bullsh*t,can they?)Crimes are excused for Democrats(blacks and Mexicans),where there are plenty to go around.We read them here on a daily basis.
In short:
Dems definition of good:Whatever gets them elected.
Dems definition of bad:Whatever doesn't.
--GR Anonymous
The man who "murdered" the woman was fleeing baseball bat thugs who were trying to kill him.
The man was trying to get away and then ran into the crowd in the street who again attacked him with ball bats. Someone coming after you with a ball bat is telling you they intend to kill you, whether they realize it or not. How the man was ever convicted of 1st degree murder is beyond me.
Post a Comment