By Grand Rapids Anonymous
tuesday, march 19, 2024 at 4:48:00 p.m. edt
Not a permanent scotus decision, but for now, texas can arrest and deport illegals
tuesday, mar 19, 2024 – 02:20 p.m.
“the supreme court on tuesday dealt a blow to the Biden administration’s attempts to keep the U.S. border open – allowing texas to enforce a new law giving local police the power to arrest migrants.
“with three liberal justices dissenting, the conservative-majority court rejected an emergency request by the Biden administration which claimed that states have no authority to legislate on immigration.
“the ruling means that texas’ law can go into effect while litigation continues in lower courts.
“the law, sb4, allows police to arrest migrants [sic] who illegally cross into the United States from mexico, and imposes criminal penalties. it also empowers judges to deport people to mexico.”
GRA: Just make it permanent.
--GRA
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
NOT PERMANENT--THAT'S FOR SURE;APPEALS COURT OVERRULES SCOTUS AND REINSTATES BAN IN ARREST AND DEPORTATION OF INVADERS
GRA:One day later is all it took to ban deportations.What these judges have up their collective sleeves
is the question.
Authored by Caden Pearsen via The Epoch Times,
A federal appeals court issued an order late on Tuesday that reinstates a hold blocking Texas from enforcing a law that enables local law enforcement to arrest suspected illegal immigrants.
This decision came from a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, voting 2-1 to overturn a previous ruling made by another panel of the same court that granted an administrative stay of the law’s implementation.
The prior 5th Circuit ruling had temporarily halted an injunction from a federal district court judge in Austin, who had blocked Texas from implementing the law. The Austin judge’s rationale was that such a law might pave the way for other states to enact their own immigration legislation.
Following the Tuesday night order, the 5th Circuit will now hear arguments on whether to stay the preliminary injunction pending appeal on Wednesday, according to the order.
“A majority of the panel has concluded that the administrative stay entered by a motions panel on March 2, 2024, should be lifted,” reads the unsigned order by the court.
Circuit Judge Andrew Oldham dissented from the majority opinion on Tuesday, advocating for the law to remain enforceable.
He wrote in his dissenting opinion, “I would leave that stay in place pending tomorrow’s oral argument on the question.”
This came hours after the U.S. Supreme Court’s conservative majority rejected an emergency request from the Biden administration to review the administrative stay ordered by the 5th Circuit’s prior panel.
--GRA
Post a Comment