Re-posted by N.S.
“George Washington university law professor Jonathan Turley said friday that former [sic] president Donald Trump is “not likely” to see his properties seized by new york attorney general Letitia James, a democrat.
“James filed judgments friday against Trump and others in westchester county, new york, where the 45th president owns a private estate in seven springs and the Trump national golf club westchester.
“Turley said James could find seizing the properties much more difficult than she thought.
“'These properties are partnerships, they have leveraged debt. All of that has to be unraveled,' Turley told fox business host Larry Kudlow. “So these aren’t just this, you know, one-to-one Trump-versus-James type of equation.”
“So in order to seize that property, she’s going to be pulled into court; there’s going to be challenges,” the law professor said. “It’s not going to happen overnight. Everyone is celebrating this idea that she’s going to padlock Trump Tower. It’s not likely to happen, and it’s certainly not likely to remain very long.”
“The other thing is that she could be harming the value of the property that she’s trying to seize with some of these actions,” Turley said of James. “I don’t think that matters to her, but it might matter to a court.”
“Trump’s attorneys said monday that the former president was having difficulty posting a bond of over $450 million to cover the judgment in a civil fraud case issued by new york judge Arthur Engoron.
“But Trump stands to gain at least $3 billion from the merger of digital world acquisition corp. with the Trump media and technology group, which was approved friday by digitial [sic] world shareholders.
“Turley noted that the damages could be reduced by appellate courts.
“'there is an issue here of the eighth amendment. there’s also an issue of due process in addition to that line of cases, which is rather thin, so this is going to be new ground for the courts to deal with. so this is sort of [!] unsettled,' Turley said.
“'the supreme court has on rare occasions stepped into state cases and said this is such a sort of [!] over-the-top damage figure that it violates due process,' he added.
“'new york is unique, I think, in this case, because they have made even the bond confiscatory. so, it’s not just the damages, but the bond rule that seems to be punitive and it’s certainly the use by James and this judge,' Turley said. 'so those are going to be viable challenges, and it could go all the way to the supreme court.'”
Originally published by the daily caller news foundation
5 comments:
As analysts,lawyers like Turley and Dershowitz seem to always miss the mark.Their opinions are based on the way law used to be practiced(minus blacks and commies as DAs and judges).They either do not comprehend the change we have seen or are afraid to appear racist in mentioning it.Mr.Trump had better hope for White judges in the upper court levels.
--GRA
Has the colored girl asked Don for a quarter yet? All blacks like quarters.
Quarter of a billion--actually closer to half a billion.
--GRA
TRUMP BOND LOWERED TO 175 MILLION--WILL PAY TO APPEAL
(ZH)A New York court of appeals has significantly reduced the bond required to stop his properties from being seized by authorities from $454 million to $175 million, in order to appeal his New York civil fraud trial.
The decision by a five-judge panel of appellate court judges, comes after the real estate mogul's lawyers argued that it was "impossible" to obtain an appeal bond of $454 million after approaching over 30 surety companies without success. Trump also said he would have to sell properties in a "fire sale" to raise cash.
GRA:Now James doesn't get her quarter(of a billion).STILL too much money,but a little less outrageous.
--GRA
MARYLAND HAS A bLACK GOVERNOR--HOW?
GRA:The collapse of the struck bridge in Baltimore last night,brought out the politicians--including Maryland's governor,a George Foreman/Frank Thomas look-a-like,named Wes Moore.
MY question,in a state with 52% Whites and 27% blacks,how did this negro get elected?
We have to put a stop to this insanity of allowing blacks to govern us.Diversity does not mean blanket rule by blacks in politics,be it mayor,police chief,judge,district attorney or governor,yet the momentum of recent appointments/election wins is clearly encouraging more blacks to run--and SOMEHOW--they are getting a lot of White votes,enough to win.
Have Whites lost their minds?Don't Whites see the fact that blacks will tilt every issue to favor themselves,in law enforcement,welfare,reparations or the safety of the neighborhoods?
I was shocked to see this negro identified as the governor.The potential for Whites to receive even a shorter straw than they do now,is reaching a critical point of no return.
--GRA
Post a Comment