By Grand Rapids Anonymous
Sunday, October 31, 2021 at 7:53:00 P.M. EDT
GRA: n.y. times says, “no word on whether she got the booster.”
(cbs) White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Sunday that she had tested positive for COVID-19, days after pulling out of the president’s overseas trip due to a family emergency. Psaki is vaccinated, and said she is only experiencing mild symptons.
Psaki said in a statement on Sunday that emergency was “members of my household testing positive for COVID-19.”
“Since then, I have quarantined and tested negative (via PCR) for COVID on Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, and Saturday,” Psaki said. “However, today, I tested positive for COVID. While I have not had close contact in person with the president or senior members of the White House staff since Wednesday — and tested negative for four days after that last contact — I am disclosing today’s positive test out of an abundance of transparency. I last saw the president on Tuesday, when we sat outside more than six feet apart, and wore masks.”
[GRA: Too bad. I wish she had sat next to Harris, Pelosi, and Fauci.]
Psaki said she planned to return to work in person after quarantining for 10 days following a negative rapid test, which she said is the White House requirement.
Mr. Biden, 78, received the two-dose Pfizer vaccine in December and January, and received his booster shot on September 27.
GRA: I don’t believe that for a minute.
--GRA
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
jerry pdx
I've been warning about this sort of thing since forever...and it's coming to pass in Britain. Mark my words though, it's just a matter of time before it happens here: https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2021/11/01/twitter-trolls-face-two-years-in-prison-under-proposed-online-harms-bill/
There is a proposal in Britain criminalizing being an online "troll" punishable by prison time. How do you define being a "troll" anyways? This is the purest kind of insanity but we are all familiar with the mindsets that believe in this sort of thing, they would love nothing better than to do the same here. Eventually the globalist and their Wokester tools will be coming for NSU and it's readers, plus every other like minded blogsite. They will silence our online voices so we will need to find other ways to communicate and organize.
I had some other thoughts about this latest development but commenters beat me to it so I'm posting a few of them here:
Sholver • 4 hours ago
Who decides what is the truth? A trans "lady" with a huge beard?
π’π²π» ππ»πΎπΆπΉπ πͺπ΅-ππΆπ»π²π΄π² Sholver • 4 hours ago • edited
If it causes me psychological harm
to be called a Nazi and a racist,
will "wokesters"
go to jail?
I didn't think so!
ding π’π²π» ππ»πΎπΆπΉπ πͺπ΅-ππΆπ»π²π΄π² • 2 hours ago • edited
“ emotional, psychological harm” who decides whether you’re free speech has caused an abstract harm? your persecutors of course π€¨
•
Mark Anglin π’π²π» ππ»πΎπΆπΉπ πͺπ΅-ππΆπ»π²π΄π² • 2 hours ago
Is this the same England that stood against buzz bombs and V2 rockets, Messerschmidts and Mausers?
If only the Hun would have recognized the weakness in Britain's mighty armor ... mean words.
A simple radio could have done it ... Adolf could broadcast "Guten morgan, mein English friends ... also, der pandemic ist poopoo, und ein "fraulein" wit Schlong auf der "footlong" nicht einen fraulein ist! Ha! Ha hahaha! "Spark it up" und schmoke it, Winston! Ha!"
•
SiberianRhod • 3 hours ago
You have to love the UK! You can rape underage White Girls with impunity if you are a Pakistani but if you are a White male and make a comment about a bearded bloke in a dress not being a woman online and you get two years in jail!
I M Deplorable • 3 hours ago
So it's OK to run a Muslim child rape gang. It's just illegal to criticize Musllim child rape gangs.
−
JoinTheBoysInGrey I M Deplorable • 3 hours ago
Similar concept for us Yanks. It's ok for blacks to commit all the thuggery they please. But if you criticize blacks, you'll get cancelled (luckily it's not against the law to criticize blacks though...for now).
“However, today, I tested positive for COVID. While I have not had close contact in person with the president or senior members of the White House staff since Wednesday ...
So the 'family emergency' was the positive test.
I bet I know something else she didn't have: any symptoms or signs of illness -- when they talk about 'COVID cases', they mean positive tests, including false positives -- positive one day, no symptoms, negative a few day later -- who can take that kind of thing seriously?
Once on a web page of the UK's NHS I saw it stated plainly that 1/3 of those with infected with SARS-CoV-2 had no symptoms -- so a pathogen allegedly responsible for a world-altering pandemic produces no symptoms in 1/3 of people who get it?
Psaki said it was the 'PCR test', but didn't the CDC recently admit there were serious problems all along with the 'PCR test'? -- and PCR is not a test; it's a procedure for multiplying any genetic/nucleic acid material present in a sample, so it can be more easily identified/isolated -- so after running a sample thru PCR, what do they test for?
Elon Musk famously tweeted a trained nurse administered an antigen test to him 4x on the same day -- the results were 2x positive, 2x negative.
You don't get the same flu shot every year, so why are they so insistent about giving us over and over this formula for the virus two years back? Where is the science investigating why this isn't working and seeing how the strains are changing? Where is the new formula? Seems they just want to subsidize big pharma as a payback for big pharma subsidizing the failing television stations that control American thought and elections? You don't think that these endless TV commercials for obscure drugs only your doctor can prescribe are not bribes to the network not to run any 60 minute type specials about how big pharma is ripping us off and one of the main factors in the extreme rise of health insurance?
Post a Comment