media evil Has been with Us for a Long Time

By Eahilf
Wednesday, November 24, 2021 at 3:00:00 A.M. EST

[“As Mass Looting Continues Apace in the Bay Area, with Support from Fake LEOs and Fake Prosecutors, ‘experts’ Demand that Everyone Stop Calling Looting ‘Looting.’”]

I have no problem with the term “organized robbery,” instead of “looting,” as long as “organized robbery” is allowed to also become “racially-charged” by consistently naming the race/ethnicity of the perpetrators, which is generally obvious (actually the term is probably already “racially-charged” in the minds of everyone except “experts” and media faggots).

I saw a recent story where an adult male (21 years old, as I recall) was arrested after using a handgun to carjack a terrified young woman – he was also out on bond/probation at the time for a list of other offenses, which the article detailed – so his identity was clearly known, but it was not published in the article – I emailed the byline reporter to ask why there was no ID – after he did not respond, I emailed an editor – here is the editor’s verbatim reply (both reporter and editor appear to be White men):

In general, we do not include the name of arrestees unless the crimes are at a level – or the person arrested is well-known enough – that we are confident we would follow them through the court process and report if the person is convicted or charges are dropped.

This is a policy we have adopted in recent years because of the way articles and names live on the Internet. ... It is a frequent occurrence that people contact us many years after the fact to say, “This article about my arrest shows up in Google and affects my life, but the charges were dropped.” ... I don’t know whether you have ever tried to follow a case through the court process. If you have – and you may well have – you know that while it is easy enough to find out when someone is arrested, it can be difficult to find out how the case is resolved. Often, it simply isn’t worth the staff time it would take for us to track a case for certain crimes, and report on the outcome. ... With this policy, we’re seeking to strike a balance between what the public needs/wants to know, and what the human impact can be of imperfect or incomplete reporting.

This is the kind of blah blah rationalizing faggotry that has reigned in the US media for several decades now.

N.S.: James Fulford has reported that the new york times began officially covering for black criminals in 1946.