By Grand Rapids Anonymous
wednesday, september 11, 2024 at 5:48:00 p.m. edt
GRA: Getting closer to WWIII.
“(zh) [fake] president Joe Biden’s latest words to reporters related to the ukrainian war strongly suggest the U.S. could be close to greenlighting the ukraine’s ability to use U.S.-supplied, long-range missiles to strike deep inside russian territory.
“the pattern of recent history is also that if Zelensky lobbies hard enough in western capitals, there’s eventual capitulation, even should there be great risk of nato escalation with russia. this is how the f-16 program happened, and it was rushed through with negative results thus far.
“amid the latest pleas from Zelensky for the west to take off all restrictions on use of offensive weaponry, Biden when asked by reporters tuesday if the U.S. will allow ukrainian forces to use longer-range missiles to target sites inside russia, said: ‘we’re working that out right now.
“Zelensky said, ‘we need to be able to do this to convince them (russia) to seek peace.”
GRA: Or more war—with nukes.
--GRA
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
PUTIN'S RESPONSE TO NATO MILITARY INVOLVEMENT VIA LONG RANGE MISSILES:"NATO AND RUSSIA WILL BE AT WAR."
(ZH)"This is not about whether or not to allow the Ukrainian regime to strike Russia using these weapons, but of deciding whether or not NATO countries are directly involved in the military conflict or not. If such a decision is taken, it will mean nothing short of direct participation of NATO countries, the United States, European countries, in the war in Ukraine. This would constitute their direct participation, and this, of course, changes the very essence, the very nature of the conflict. It will mean that NATO countries, the United States and European countries, are at war with Russia. And if this is so, bearing in mind the change in the very nature of the conflict, we will make appropriate decisions based on the threats that will be posed to us," Putin said.
--GRA
jerry pdx
Anybody remember Trump said twice in the debate that Russia has nuclear weapons. He did not elaborate but should have. Kamala said nothing. Trump has spoken out about "endless wars" and condemned the Iraq war. Yet nobody on the left has commented on the irony that the man they hate with a red hot passion is the closest to an anti war President we've ever had. Isn't the left supposed to be rabidly anti war? Anti foreign intervention? Anti endless war? The silence from the left is deafening.
That was the left of 1967. Now the "left" seemingly,doesn't want anyone "left" after we start WW III by bombing Moscow--via Ukraine. Kind of the reverse of the Cuban Missile crisis.
--GRA
At THE U.N.,RUSSIA CONFIRMS THE OPTION OF DECLARED WAR WITH NATO(IF LONG RANGE MISSILES ARE APPROVED BY biden);U.S. DOWNPLAYS TALK AS B.S.
(Zh)It appears a highly dangerous nuclear game of chicken (among nuclear super-powers!) is being played out on the world stage...
HARD TO TAKE ANYTHING FROM PUTIN AT HIS WORD: KIRBY
Below is more from breaking White House statements issued by spokesman John Kirby ahead of an afternoon press briefing. He appears to actually be downplaying Putin's warning.
Kirby: "If Mr. Putin is so concerned about the safety and security of Russian sites and cities, the easiest way to alleviate those concerns is to get his troops to hell out of Ukraine and the war."
"...He starts brandishing the nuclear sword, for instance, yeah, we take that seriously. We constantly monitor that kind of activity. He obviously has proven capable of aggression. He's obviously proven capable of escalation over the last now going on three years. So, yeah, we take these guns seriously, but it is not something that we haven't heard before. So, we take note of it.... We have our own calculus for what we decide to divide to Ukraine and what not."
"There has been no change in our philosophy about the type of missiles Ukraine can use."
GRA:Will biden and blinken blink?
--GRA
Post a Comment