Fake News Reporters and Fake Scholars are Using the Same Talking Points in Discussing Atlanta-Area Bordello Murders that They Used during the Duke Rape Hoax; the Only Problem is that Dissident Right Editors are so Hell-Bent on “Disappearing” the Work that Tied Everything Together that They Fail at the Job

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

On January 13, 2007, VDARE’s Peter Brimelow published my 10,400-word exposé on the Duke Rape Hoax, which he titled, “Nicholas Stix’ Absolutely Definitive Account of the Incredible Disappearing Duke Rape Hoax.”

My report justified the title, but I had merely called my manuscript something like, “The Duke Rape Hoax.”

For the next 13 years, every time Peter ran a blog or front-page article discussing the Duke Rape Hoax, it would contain at least one link to my exposé.

Peter was then in his Dr. Jekyll mode towards me, where he was my biggest supporter. Several years ago, he switched to his Mr. Hyde mode. He decided that, due to some characteristic of mine, my influence on the “Dissident Right” (until circa 2010 known as “paleo-conservatism”) needed to be gradually diminished, and then completely eliminated. And this wasn’t a personal bugaboo of Peter’s alone. Even before Peter started last year, cheating me completely out of publications and fees for works he’d commissioned, he and his colleagues would commission and pay writers to write on my beat—race and crime, in particular, the Knoxville Horror and the Nation of Islam’s Zebra Killings—who might have been excellent writers on other topics, but could not carry my jockstrap on my beat. Some of the writers in question weren’t excellent writers on any beat. I think it was Peter who spoke of an “interstitial” occurring during the mid-1990s, in which there was a freedom to publish books like The Bell Curve, which soon ended. I think something similar happened in paleo-conservatism, which allowed me, a Jew without a pot to pee in, to be published with ever greater frequency. That does not cover neo-conservatism, however, whose bosses were at the time more anti-Semitic towards “the wrong kind” of Jews than paleo gentiles. Now, it looks like the two sides have achieved a rough parity. However, both sides are friendly towards “credentialed,” well-to-do, Jewish mediocrities.

(Should anyone argue, “But the media are lousy with Jewish writers!” I shall point out, as I have for years, sure, but they’re lousy Jewish writers. Among Jewish scribblers, the Age of Meritocracy has been replaced by the Age of Nepotism.)

The masters of the Dissident Right no longer care about excellence, and the neocon Right is generally unreadable.

My unpersoning continues apace with the Ann Coulter column below: The version published by Peter contained not a single link to my investigative report. I responded by removing every hyperlink that James Fulford had inserted to other, inferior articles on the Duke Rape Hoax, and replaced them with links to my report.

 

Ann Coulter: Asian Female Writers, Activists—Asian Women are too Damn Hot!
By Ann Coulter
March 24, 2021

Does anyone else find it odd that so many Asian activists reacted to the mass murder of (mostly) Asian women last week by talking about how smoking hot they are?

I was at law school when I first noticed the phenomenon of liberal women pretending to be outraged as a cover for bragging. Average-to-ugly girls would work up feigned indignation about how a guy had “sexually harassed” them that day, then launch into a 20-minute retelling of some compliment they’d received. A man talked to me! I think he likes me … Let’s see, how do I work this into conversation for the rest of the week?

But it’s a peculiar reaction to mass murder.

Now that a white supremacist mass shooter (check that, turns out he was a radical Islamic Syrian refugee!) has committed a different mass murder in Boulder, Colorado, will we see hippies on TV, denouncing the assumption that Birkenstock-wearers are all sex gods?

No, of course not! Only liberals would think an appropriate response to an infamous crime is to talk about how sexually desirable they are. Liberalism makes everybody stupid.

Thus, for days after the fatal shooting of six Asians and two whites at massage-cum-sex spas in Atlanta, Asian activists and professors blanketed the airwaves to demand that white men STOP treating them like sex objects—whom they fantasize about, they want, they covet. Newspapers were chock-a-block with first-person accounts of Asian women being salivated over by white men.

Christine Liwag Dixon modestly began her tale of oppression for The Washington Post’s “The Lily”: “When I was 16, a boy I thought was my friend said, ‘I can’t figure you out. Asian girls are either smart or hot. But you’re both.’” She’s older and married now, but still cherishes this comment from high school.

Amid her recitation of other compliments she’d received over the course of a lifetime—some stupid, some vulgar, and some, I’d wager, completely fictional—Liwag Dixon remarked, “It no longer surprises me, but it still hurts.”

Well, naturally. Who wouldn’t be hurt to be called both smart AND hot?

Among the distressing compliments detailed by Liwag Dixon, she reports that she was often called “exotic.” (I will NOT link to the scene in NewsRadio, where Beth explains the meaning of words like “cute,” “beautiful” and “exotic.”)

Professors of color were prepared with scholarly opinions about how tantalizing Asian women are. Elaine Kim, professor emeritus in Asian American studies at the University of California, Berkeley, told the Associated Press that the Atlanta shooter probably had “an addiction to fantasies about Asian women as sex objects.”

However that may be, these particular spas were known as fronts for prostitution, which may also have put the idea of sex in the shooter’s head.

Another Berkeley professor, Catherine Ceniza Choy (Ethnic Studies), conveyed that the shooting “echoes a long-running stereotype that Asian women are immoral and hypersexual.” Ellen Wu, a history professor at Indiana University, confirmed that “from the moment Asian women began to migrate to the U.S., they were targets of hypersexualization.”

It all had a familiar ring …

HEY! Anybody remember the Duke lacrosse rape hoax?

Before the gang rape of a black stripper was exposed as a complete fraud—though well after three white families had their pockets emptied and their names dragged through the mud—an enormous amount of the commentary centered on white men’s lascivious interest in black women. (So of course the gang rape had to be true!)

The Duke lacrosse case “fed the stereotype that black women are hypersexual and readily available,” as the Associated Press put it. The article quoted a number of black coeds on how white guys just can’t keep their hands off African American ladies:

“The young black women can almost finish each other’s stories.

“They go to a party, a concert, a nightclub. Twenty-somethings of all colors are flirting and dancing. And then it happens.

[N.S.: This section—above and below—was fabricated by black fake news reporter Erin Texeira, who was the AP’s “race reporter” back in 2006, and who mysteriously disappeared, not long thereafter. I exposed Texeira’s fiction writing.]

“Inevitably, a woman says, a white man asks her to dance erotically while he watches. Or he grabs her rear end. Or asks for sex, in graphic detail, without bothering to ask her name.”

A black Duke coed, Audrey Christopher, complained to the Durham Indy that “at one of the quad parties, it was me and another black female friend, and these white guys immediately told us how they liked hanging out with black girls because white girls are sheltered and we’re more free …”

Again, the professors of color weighed in. Rebecca Hall (Surprise! Also Berkeley) said of the Duke gang-rape charges, a “black woman is somebody who has excess sexuality … it’s excess sexuality that white men are entitled to.” Duke professor Mark Anthony Neal said: “The message that men get about black women is these are women that are available to them, that they have easy access and their sole purpose is to serve their pleasure.”

To the extent that their argument isn’t simply that black women are hot, hot, hot, but that white men feel entitled to pillage black bodies, that’s not borne out by the data. According to FBI crime statistics, approximately 15,000 to 30,000 white women are raped by black men every year, while, on average, zero black women are raped by white men. (The department uses “0” to denote fewer than 10 victims.)

Nor, of course, was the rapacious white male theory supported by the facts of the very case they were discussing.

We don’t have a lot of women mass shooters, so it’s hard to flip the script. But maybe, in the future, whenever a white man is falsely accused of rape (Steve Pagones, the Duke lacrosse players, a fraternity at the University of Virginia) or murder (Darren Wilson, Jake Gardner, Staten Island police officers), white men should fan out across the airwaves to talk about how damn sexy they are.

Until then, I’m begging you, white men, please, for the love of God, STOP turning liberal women into your sexual fantasies!!!