Friday, March 01, 2019

The Journalistic Instincts of a Top Hoax-Hunter: Please Support WEJB/NSU!


One week ago, my VDARE colleague, John Derbyshire announced to the world that yours truly was the first journalist to call hoax on Jussie Smollett.
“VDARE.com’s Nicholas Stix—who, by the way, should you get the chance to meet him in one of our clandestine gatherings down in the catacombs, is a first-class journalist who would have been a household name back in the days when mainstream journalism meant something more than just parroting the CultMarx narrative—Nicholas Stix called hoax on January 29th, the very day it was first reported.”
My friend and crime-partner, David in TN responded to John,
“Thanks for mentioning my friend Nicholas Stix. He can read these hoaxes with his eyes closed.”
Rich added,
Stix is a very good writer, I think the guy grew up in Queens, NY, so he knows all about Negro crime and the MSM covering it up. As a fellow Queens boy, I saw through this nonsensical story from minute one, there are no White Trump voters who knew who this Jussie character was or ever watched the black TV show he was on.
I lived through the Howard Beach I (December, 1986) and Tawana Brawley (November, 1987) hoaxes, respectively, and did my first work on hoaxes with a review of the 1990 Brawley Hoax book written by a team of New York Times reporters, Outrage.

(Outrage had some excellent reporting, including recounting how a former neighbor of Brawley’s had observed her crawl into the garbage bag in which she was found, and how the sexual assault nurse examiner determined that Brawley had not been raped, and was obviously faking unconsciousness. However, it never explained the refusal of New York Gov. Mario Cuomo, Attorney General Robert Abrams, or the State Police to act on said information, or the MSM to report on it at the time.)

I have exposed more hoaxes than I can count. My legendary VDARE editor-publisher, Peter Brimelow, called my 10,000-word, January 2007 investigative report on the Duke Rape Hoax, “Nicholas Stix` Absolutely Definitive Account of the Incredible Disappearing Duke Rape Hoax.”

Please hit the PayPal “Donate” tab at the top of this page, and make a generous donation.

I thank you, and your posterity will, too.

Sincerely,

Nicholas Stix


2 comments:

Anonymous said...

GRAND RAPIDS SLOWLY GOING ILLEGAL
GRA:My city,which is steadily declining,with blacks invading white neighborhoods,is facing a secondary annihilation--with the complete support of the city politicians and especially the new black city manager and new female sheriff.
After a snafu regarding a Mexican(but an American citizen/military guy with PTSD)who tried to light a fire at a hospital and was reported to ICE,the local female sheriff said "Illegals would no longer be reported to ICE."The policeman involved was cleared by his department,but the black city manager said he "wanted the case reopened and the policeman punished."
ICE responded by naming 3 illegals the city released on the streets--one of whom was charged with attempted murder--and said "local officials are endangering the community with this new policy."
So there's ICE and GR police on one side,the Sheriff and city politicos on the other,as Grand Rapids pushes to be an unofficial sanctuary city--and ignore illegal crime.
The following story is part of the controversy:
GRPD capt. who called ICE about veteran put on leave
GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (WOOD) — The Grand Rapids Police Command Officers Association is accusing top city officials of interfering with the arrest of two people who they say led a group of marchers to bust through police lines during a protest last year.

Union leaders mentioned the incident at a Thursday news conference called to criticize the placement of Grand Rapids Police Department Capt. Curt VanderKooi on administrative leave in connection to the wrongful immigration detention of a U.S. citizen and Marine veteran.

Target 8 investigators were already looking into the May 1, 2018, incident and have obtained police reports and bodycam video that shows marchers suddenly veering off Grandville Avenue onto a side street as police officers tried but failed to keep them on the main route. The video shows one man running through police tape and dragging it with him.

A few days after the march, police reviewed the bodycam video and got City Attorney Anita Hitchcock to approve arrest warrants for two people for disobeying officers. A judge signed the warrants, according to documents Target 8 investigators got through the Freedom of Information Act. But then Hitchcock suddenly withdrew the warrants.

On Thursday, GRPD Cap. Geoff Collard, the vice president of the command officers union, suggested interference from above.

"The acting city manager and the mayor became involved and the warrants were quashed," he told reporters, reading from prepared comments (PDF).

When Target 8 investigators began asking questions in December, Mayor Roslynn Bliss said in an email exchange that while she did get a "brief update" on the case, she "did not ask or encourage her (the city attorney) to do anything."

"I did not---nor would I ever---ask our City Attorney to drop an arrest warrant," she added.

When asked why Hitchcock would approve and then withdraw the warrants, a city spokesperson told Target 8 investigators that "in the light of the global conversation around immigration at that time, the City Attorney determined it was reasonable and in the best interest of justice to dismiss any charges against the individuals who disregarded instructions by our police officers."

The spokesperson, Amy Snow-Buckner, prefaced that by writing:

"We are committed to being a welcoming and inclusive community where individuals are able to communicate their messages and exercise their First Amendment right in a safe and peaceful manner."

But Collard, the union vice president, disagreed.

"There's no clearer example that our city leadership would rather appease these groups who intentionally violate the law," he said
---GR Anonymous

Anonymous said...

I just saw DiBlassio's wife on Tucker Carlson's show...all I can say is,WTF!!!That MARRIAGE must be a hoax.Living with Blah blah must add 30 years to a black woman's face--which normally doesn't show age as much as whites.Jeeeesh.
Must be another one of those Clinton partnership marriages or similar to the Obama's-whose goals are purely for politics and business --plus ruining the USA.
--GR Anonymous