Sunday, June 27, 2021 at 1:31:00 A.M. EDT
Alan J. Levine, historian and specialist on World War II and the Cold War, in 2018 published After Sputnik: America, the World, and Cold War Conflicts.
When the Soviet Union launched Sputnik I on October 4, 1957, it was a shattering blow to American national morale and confidence in the superiority of the American system. There was a real fear the Soviet Union would pass the United States in technology and power.
In a continuation from Levine’s book on the 1950s, Bad Old Days, Levine shows that the years 1958-59 were not a time of complacency, but some of the most anxious of the Cold War.
There were serious crises in the Middle East (Lebanon), Taiwan Straits (called “Quemoy and Matsu” at the time), Indonesia, Berlin, and finally, Castro’s takeover of Cuba.
Chiang Kai-Shek was a troublesome “ally,” and Berlin was always especially dangerous. President Dwight Eisenhower later said 1958 was the worst year of his life.
The two best chapters are “Eisenhower's Paradise? America in the 1950s,” and “The Enemy: Khrushchev’s USSR.”
Levine has findings contrary to the Conventional Wisdom. Eisenhower was much more of a hard-liner than sometimes pictured. His administration was aware that the problems of the “underdeveloped world were not created by the Soviets or other Communists, however much they were exploited by them.”
Eisenhower and Secretary of State John Foster Dulles were more “able and interesting than has been thought.” They dealt with a rogues’ gallery of enemies--Khrushchev, Mao, Nasser, Sukarno and Castro. Khrushchev, especially, was not the likeable uncle of later American perceptions. Remember how Stalin was called “Uncle Joe”?
Levine, unlike some so-called historians, takes the Cold War seriously: “It WAS a war, short of all-out war, but a war nevertheless, and very different from ‘peacetime.’”
Some people by 1959 were starting to get “bored” by the Cold War. Levine feels this was a key to some of the attitudes that came later.
Some of the more stupid later attitudes hadn’t taken hold. The guilt complex toward what would later be called “the Third World” “was far from universal in this period.” Some liberals resented being lectured by Asian and African “neutralists” on American racial discrimination. After all, these peoples were “notorious for caste, ethnic, and religious hostilities and brutal customs.”
The main problem for the United States was not winning the Cold War, but surviving it. Or not losing it. Eisenhower led us through eight years of crisis. They were halted short of disaster, but would recur.
Levine concluded with: “And, thanks to Castro’s victory a whole new front in the Cold War had opened up. Khrushchev’s offensive would be renewed, and converging with the unexpected triumph in Cuba, would produce the greatest crisis of the Cold War.”
Alan J. Levine’s next book is N.S.: Every time I think I’ve got David cubbyholed, he goes and surprises me with new versatility!
7 comments:
David is a very intelligent person and his writing style reflects that.
That's my review of David's review.
I do have one question:What do I learn from reading such a book,that applies to today?
--GRA
GRA,
Thanks. The book shows how different (overwhelmingly white for one thing) America was in the 50s, but there were undercurrents predicating the changes that would come in the 60s and later.
jerry pdx
Greek woman is raped by Afghan...When she asks for help from 3 passing Pakis, they rape her also: https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2021/06/27/raped-migrant-pregnant-woman-pleaded-help-but-passers-raped-her-too/
One has to wonder, just how infested is Greece with Muzzie scum that this woman can't turn around with running into a raping follower of Islam? I did a little research and discovered that the population of Greece is just over 11,000,000 people, the same population as Sweden. There are close to a million foreigners living in Greece which means about a 10th of the population is now foreign. There is a graph showing the variety of foreigners living in Greece and it shows there is a cross section of nationalities, even many from neighboring European countries like Albania or Romania. However, the Wiki entry was date 2011 and there does not seem to be data for later than that. Why is Wiki so out of date? Do they not want more current population information to be out there? How much has immigration expanded since 2011?
There was more that was suspicious, this is Wiki after all and you don't call it the fake encyclopedia for nothing. I spotted this comment:
In the 2010s, in the wake of the Greek financial crisis, the population started to decrase and birthrates plummeted, while death rates increased due to an aging population. Many Greeks emigrated abroad, while more recently the population decrease has been largely stabilized due to foreign immigration.
Population "stabilized" due to immigration? It states that most foreign immigrants are from neighboring European countries like Albania or Hungary which seems to contradict the idea that most immigrants are coming from the Middle East, Africa or Asia. But aren't birth rates in Europe plunging continent wide? So if most migrants are coming from Hungary, Albania etc... then the populations of those countries would be dropping from out migration and the regional native population of Europe would still be going down.
The Wiki graphs showed 18,000 migrants from Pakistan and around 30,000 from other Middle Eastern countries but I don't believe those numbers tell the whole story. I've read about how Middle Eastern and migrant immigrants will illegally enter various European countries, then get shuttled to other European countries, I wouldn't be the slightest bit surprised if Muslims and Africans are getting counted as being from let say, Hungary, because they "came" from Hungary, even though they are not Hungarian but originally from Asia or Africa. And also, are those numbers also from 2011 and haven't been updated for nearly 10 years? It wasn't clear.
Is this Wiki entry designed to downplay the impact of mass migration from the 3rd world? I just don't know but since all the data we see online passes through the filter of Woke ideologues, it's all suspect.
Something tells me these rapists will be candy ass sentences of some kind, after all, they just didn't know it was wrong in the White world. What's with the Greeks anyways? Aren't they the home of the Spartans? The most feared warriors in ancient Europe? Wasn't that move 300 based on how courageous Spartan warriors were? I think the operative word is "were". Have they been emasculated like the Vikings have been? Now Pakis, Afghans and Africans can rape their woman with impunity while the men do nothing? The global replacement plan will work one way or the other, White women that do not voluntarily choose to bear children of 3rd world invaders will be raped and forced to bear them anyways.
"Some liberals resented being lectured by Asian and African 'neutralists' on American racial discrimination. After all, these peoples were 'notorious for caste, ethnic, and religious hostilities and brutal customs.'”
Correct. Except the liberal today would not resent being lectured by the commie or the 3rd world leader. Would want to be lectured.
Eisenhower at least in my life time the most competent President we have had. That man most prepared for the office. Undeniable.
jerry pdx
Who is Sam Asghari? Glad you asked, he's Brittney Spear muzzy boyfriend: https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/britney-spears-boyfriend-sam-asghari-what-to-know?utm_source=spotim&utm_medium=spotim_conversation&spot_im_redirect_source=notifications&spot_im_comment_id=sp_ANQXRpqH_urn%243Auri%243Abase64%243A94c0d4a4-3b47-510c-8180-ce34b1549ba7_c_1uVYnWAkZFdV1v52FcsUoRmvuCj&spot_im_highlight_immediate=true
I don't know how much I care about neurotic basket case muzzshark (new word?) Brittney Spears but when I read about her boyfriend Sam Asghari it underscored an issue I've been pointed out many times. He immigrated to the US when he was a youngster while his mother and 3 sisters stayed behind in Iran. Come again? The boy gets to escape to paradise while the females in his family stay in the clutches of Islam? When I hear something like this I think of some of the Muslim men I've met in the US, I've personally known several that told me similar stories of coming to the US while their sisters stayed behind, either that or their sisters getting sent back to the old country before adolescence for reasons they don't want to say directly. I asked a couple of guys about it and they just kind of mumbled some vague gibberish. What they don't want to say is that Muslim families often send girls back to the Middle East to get them safely married off to older Muslim men before they get old enough to object. Middle Eastern men are virulently hostile to Western men marrying "their" women, but feel they have a divine right granted by Allah to have sex with as many White western women as possible.
I've argued with migrant zealots many times and they invariably tell me that all migrants are escaping conflicts or persecution of some kind but that begs the question as to why a guy like this Asghari dude gets to live the life of riley in the US while his sisters are stuck in that "conflict" zone being persecuted. Truth is, there is no "persecution" or "conflict", unless an underage girls forced into marriage with an older man and doomed to a life of cranking out babies in the name of Allah is considered "persecution".
You'll never hear a White Western feminist talk about this. Guaranteed.
CALIFORNIA LIBERALS HAVE A TORTILLA CHIP ON THEIR SHOULDER
Disneyland isn't the only place to find Goofy.
Assaults by homeless upon the citizens are tolerated, or at least not given the same
outrage as throwing tortillas at a HS basketball game. Oh the humanity!
https://abcnews.go.com/Sports/high-school-basketball-coach-fired-tortilla-throwing-incident/story?id=78440590
Post a Comment