Thursday, May 13, 2021

More on Criminal General Merrick Garland’s War on Whites

[Re: “Criminal General Merrick Garland Says White Supremacy is Top Security Threat.”]

By Grand Rapids Anonymous
Thursday, May 13, 2021 at 1:37:00 A.M. EDT

Garland’s warning came during a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, which was conducted by supporters of then-President Donald Trump and incited by white supremacist groups like the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys. Five people died as a result of the attack.

[GRA: Five—that’s dangerous? One day’s killing in Chicago, Baltimore, NYC, Philly or LA.]

[N.S.: I don’t know that anyone died, as a result of the “attack,” though black Capitol Police Officer Lt. Michael Leroy Byrd murdered White patriot Ashli Babbitt.]

“In my career as a judge and in law enforcement, I have not seen a more dangerous threat to democracy than the invasion of the Capitol,” Garland said, calling the attack an “attempt to interfere with a fundamental element of our democracy, the peaceful transfer of power.” [N.S.: Unlike stealing a national election.] The attorney general went on to say that “there has to be a hierarchy of things that we prioritize. This would be the one we’d prioritize.”

[GRA: It was attempting to “interfere” with the unlawful, uninvestigated election fraud of 2020—of which MY main gripe was, no court would take evidence—as proof of malfeasance—because of the fear, that in doing so, would cause black groups (not deemed dangerous) from rioting in all 50 states.

In 1995, Garland investigated the bombing of a federal building in Oklahoma City by white supremacists, an attack that killed 168 people, including 19 children. The bombing came at a time when militants were galvanized by violent encounters with federal authorities in Waco, Texas, and Ruby Ridge, Idaho.

The threat of domestic terrorism receded in the public imagination after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, which were carried out by Islamic fundamentalists from Saudi Arabia and other nations. But as that threat has diminished in recent years, militant white nationalism has returned as a top concern.

GRA: The COUNTRY needs White supremacism to make a HUGE comeback, or the country dissolves.

GRA: The small number of White groups in the United States are dwarfed by nlm, naacp, noi, etc.—yet those groups are applauded for pushing black supremacy.

Anyone—like Garland—who shows the severe disdain for his own race, can only be assumed to be a full blown communist.

Add up the numbers of deaths caused by Whites vs. blacks—and try to convince me, WHO’S THE MOST DANGEROUS?

--GRA

 

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I inserted "nlm" into the other black groups and I think,from this point forward,I'm going to refer to blm as as nlm(nig*ers lives matter)--which they don't.

--GRA

Anonymous said...

GARLAND IS PATHETIC,BUT BARR WAS JUST AS BAD--BLOCKED CHAUVIN PLEA DEAL;TRIAL OF LANE,KEUNG AND TGAO DELAYED

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — The trial of three former Minneapolis police officers charged with aiding and abetting in the death of George Floyd will be pushed back to March 2022, a judge ruled Thursday.

Thomas Lane, J. Kueng and Tou Thao were scheduled to face trial Aug. 23 on charges they aided and abetted both murder and manslaughter.

Judge Peter Cahill said he changed the date so the federal case can go forward first. He also said he felt the need to put some distance between the three officers’ trial and Chauvin’s due to all the publicity around the case.

The news that the trial was being pushed back came during a Thursday hearing on pretrial motions. Defense attorneys for all three former officers agreed to the postponement. The state, via Assistant Attorney General Matthew Frank, did not support the delay. It wasn’t made clear at Thursday’s motions hearing who originally sought the change.

Cahill also weighed Thursday a request that prosecutors be sanctioned after media reports that Chauvin had planned to plead guilty a year ago, and allegations that they haven’t disclosed information about the alleged coercion of a witness.


Bob Paule, Thao’s attorney, said in a court filing Wednesday that Dr.Andrew Baker initially said there was no physical evidence that Floyd died of asphyxiation. But after talking twice to Dr. Roger Mitchell – a former medical examiner in Washington, D.C. – he amended his findings to include neck compression as a factor, according to Paule.

Paule said that in one of the conversations, Mitchell called Baker and told him he was going to submit an opinion piece critical of Baker’s findings to the Washington Post. When Baker released final autopsy findings June 1, they included neck compression, Paule wrote, and Mitchell never submitted his piece to the newspaper.

Mitchell, now chairman of the Department of Pathology at the Howard University College of Medicine, did not immediately respond to a phone message left at the department after hours.

Paule also took aim at Mitchell’s criticism of Dr. David Fowler, a key defense witness for Chauvin who testified that the former officer was not responsible for Floyd’s death. Mitchell sent a letter — signed by 431 doctors from around the country — to the Maryland attorney general, saying Fowler’s conclusions were so far outside the bounds of accepted forensic practice that all his previous work could be questioned.

Maryland officials then announced they would review all in-custody death reports during Fowler’s tenure. Paule said Mitchell’s accusations had a chilling effect on Thao’s ability to find medical experts unafraid to testify on his behalf.

He said prosecutors have yet to give the defense evidence about Mitchell’s actions. He’s asking that the case against Thao be dismissed.

The New York Times reported Feb. 10 that Chauvin was ready to plead guilty to a third-degree murder charge last year but then-Attorney General William Barr rejected the agreement. The Associated Press published a similar report the next day, citing two law enforcement officials with direct knowledge of the talks. Paule alleged that the leaks came from the state, and asked that anyone who did so be barred from participating in the trial. Tom Plunkett, Kueng’s attorney, echoed his statements.

Ellison earlier dismissed Paule’s motion as “completely false and an outlandish attempt to disparage the prosecution.”

--GRA

phillyguy said...

((Garland)) is a anti white, anti American, anti Christian bigot, he hates white people more than anything.