By Grand Rapids Anonymous
Monday, March 15, 2021 at 11:08:00 A.M. EDT
N.S.: The best medication or vaccine causes a small percentage of cases of extreme side effects, up to and including deaths. That’s my pharmaceutical companies have their announcers on their TV commercials read those endless lists of potential side-effects.
These people and their actuaries work with industry-wide thresholds. However, in order to sow maximum chaos and aggrandize their own power, Lord Fauci and his accomplices have refused to inform the public about such thresholds.
Germany Suspends Aztrazeneca Jab (ZH)
Update (10:45 ET): Despite insistence from AstraZeneca, the WHO and other entities that the AstraZeneca jab is safe and that there's no evidence linking vaccines to dangerous blood clots observed in dozens of patients, Germany has just joined the growing list of countries that have suspended vaccinations using the AZ jab.
As Europe's biggest economy, Germany’s decision carries outsize weight. This isn’t the first time Berlin has embraced a cautious approach to vaccines. It initially only approved the AZ jab for use on people under the age of 65, which angered critics who claimed the country was denying jabs to the population that is most vulnerable to vaccinations.
Meanwhile, the UK continues to mock EU nations for their cautious approach.
Germany’s decision to suspend followed advice from its national regulator, which said the jabs should be suspended out of an abundance of caution - language used by other EU governments to justify the decision.
Given the overwhelming wave of criticism from the WHO, Brussels and the UK, which have lambasted governments that suspended the jab for feeding into fears about vaccines, we’re surprised Twitter and Facebook haven’t censored reports about the suspensions already. More than a dozen countries have now suspended the jab, though Thailand has reinstated it Monday.
* * *
Despite the best efforts of Brussels and AstraZeneca to convince Europeans that there is no heightened risk of deadly blood clots associate with the COVID vaccine developed by AstraZeneca and Oxford, more countries have banned the jabs, adding another massive obstacle to Europe’s already faltering vaccination effort.
Even as regulators from Europe to Asia insist that they have found no fault with the AZ jabs, the Netherlands has announced plans to join a growing list of about a dozen places, including northern Italy, Ireland and Thailand, moving to suspend the shot over concerns about possible side effects from two batches.
About a dozen countries have banned the jabs, although Thailand allowed AZ jabs to proceed on Monday, four days after halting them. Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-Ocha and some of his cabinet members will be receiving it on Tuesday after a medical panel said there was no sign the vaccine contributed to blood clots.
AstraZeneca said a “careful” review of all available data of the more than 17MM people in the EU and the UK that have received the AZ jab showed no evidence of an increased risk of pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis or thrombocytopenia. Yet, more reports of deadly blood clots in post-vaccine patients have emerged. Marco Cavaleri, European Medicines Agency’s chair of the vaccine evaluation team, insisted in an interview with France24 on Monday, that there is no causal link right now between AstraZeneca shots and deaths. The WHO has called the jab “excellent,” and insisted there is no reason to delay inoculations.
AstraZeneca’s Chief Medical Officer Ann Taylor said the number of events are lower than what would be expected to occur naturally in a general population of that size. In studies, participants getting the vaccine had fewer clots than those given placebo. Others warned that the world can’t halt vaccination campaigns every time somebody who receives the vaccine gets sick.
More deaths have been potentially linked to the vaccine, as Denmark’s Medicines Agency said a 60-year-old woman died after receiving the AstraZeneca shot, suffering from an “unusual” combination of symptoms that raised suspicions.
GRA: This is like going to Vegas, and playing craps.
--GRA
2 comments:
Adverse effects of drugs are worse than the drug companies admit. First of all, they eliminate many people at the beginning of a study--people who would add to the adverse effects. Second, there are requirements to report when a certain percentage of patients in a trial have an adverse effect. To avoid that reporting threshold, the drug companies break down that effect into several categories so that these new categories don't exceed the reporting threshold. In the case of these new experimental biological agents, there are at least 4 major concerns. Of course it is almost impossible to prove that someone who died a few days after getting the vaccination died because of it--so after all the deaths, you usually see a statement claiming it is unrelated to the vaccination. What cannot be denied is that these biological agents have not been around long so that NO ONE knows what the long term effects will be. When you get vaccinated with these new agents you become part of an experiment to see that the long term effects will be. In effect you are playing Russian (Chinese?) roulette without knowing how many bullets are in the revolver you just spun and put to your head. To quote Dirty Harry, "Do you feel lucky punk? Well do you?"
Experimental drug not having the normal protocol of clinical trials. Chips will fly when the forest cut down?
Post a Comment