Saturday, September 20, 2025
The inability to support their agenda with any kind of rational argument was being revealed on a regular basis by Charlie Kirk, and is one of the things what drives woke ideologues into homicidal furies
jerry pdx
Funny, I had a negro female come to my door as a "door to door" activist looking for donations to support immigrant rights. She was 20 something, obese and looked like a lesbian. She started lecturing me on how we needed to support the "migrant community". However, she was an anomaly, mass migration zealots in pdx tend to be young White woke types, rarely to do you see negroes pushing for migrants the way Whites do. They don't want immigrants competing with them for their welfare benefits. so they're a little more realistic about the reality of mass migration.
I asked this girl who came to my door a simple question: "How does mass immigration help with things like global warming, pollution, deforestation and endangered species"?
When I asked this question she went blank for a moment, then self righteously said "We do support those issues" I said that isn't my question, my question is "How does bringing millions of people in from the 3rd world and turning them into consumers "help" with those environmental issues"?
She went completely blank for a moment, because it was clearly something that had never occurred to her. Then she angrily told me: "You just hate immigrants". Then she turned around and walked off, it was her only argument.
I yelled at her as she was walking away: 'You really don't know anything about anything, do you"?
That inability to support their agenda with any kind of rational argument was being revealed on a regular basis by Charlie Kirk and is one of the things what drives woke ideologues into homicidal furies.
Saturday, September 20, 2025 at 9:29:00 AM EDT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
If it wasn't the fact that woke nutjobs hate debating against well conceived arguments,there would be other excuses to kill. After all,the minds of these people are quite warped.
--GRA
This has some telling insights into Leftist rage:
From TV GUIDE, 1965, an article about several "genius" writers carping about "The Death of TV Drama"-
While there's some validity to the complaints about censorship and problems with pressure groups and advertisers, the comments are hysterically overwrought. The worst offender: far-left Stirling Silliphant, who says, "The NAB (Practices and Standards) Code is an "intellectual dictatorship... It's the barbed wire, the prison guards and the machine guns." Mr. S sounds like an Auschwitz survivor, but he's not Jewish, he's actually descended from Pilgrim stock, like his Fellow Traveler, Dalton Trumbo. Someone once noted that those types are often America-haters; why that should be the case, I have no idea. This is the kicker (emphasis mine): he goes on to say that after the (censorship) hearings, "I felt like LEADING AN ARMED INSURRECTION AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT..." Now where would anyone get the notion that leftist authors are dangerous, unhinged radicals who need censorship to keep them in line?
(One of Mr. Silliphant's proudest moments was when he had a black man slap a white man's face in return for being slapped himself, in IN THE HEAT OF THE NIGHT.)
Another shining example: Hack writer Richard Alan Simmons was responsible for one of the worst TV episodes of its era, a thing called PRICE OF TOMATOES, for THE DICK POWELL THEATRE. To boil it down, it was about about a truck driver helping an illegal alien cross into the U.S. so she can have an "anchor baby"! The program was showered with acclaim, and won star Peter Falk an Emmy, which gave a big boost to his career. Mr. Simmons' comment in the article (again, my emphasis): "No politics LEFT OF DEMOCRAT VALUES is tolerated." Well, since Democrats even then were Liberal and Socialist, what was to the "left" of them? Answer: COMMUNISM. But I thought all that stuff about Communist Hollywood writers was a "witch hunt!"
There's more nonsense- supposedly no groups were allowed to be depicted in a bad light, yet Christians were CONSTANTLY depicted on TV shows (especially Westerns) as bigots, hypocrites, "Bible-thumpers," wife- (and child-) beaters. And the consensus is there was almost nothing worthwhile ever on TV, despite the many outstanding dramas that somehow got on the air despite the restrictions (including some of Mr. Silliphant's own work).
The nightmare that is our modern culture is the result of all restrictions being removed. Like so many other aspects of life, what people feared from the "intelligentsia" turned out to be very real.
-RM
jerry pdx
The worst, and the first may well be literature when To Kill a Mockingbird was released. I remember being assigned to read that book when I was in school and believing that black men were being falsely accused of rape and hung right and left. It produced (and still is producing due to required reading) a generation of minds that can't differentiate reality from a MADE UP STORY! You can't even bring up the statistical fact that black men commit a wildly disproportionate amount of rape, especially interracial rape without somebody casting back to reading that book in their youth and thinking you represent some vast conspiracy to falsely accuse black men of rape. Then the same kind of thinking expressed in that book permeated into the rest of the entertainment industry magnifying the false ideas that were implanted by that fictional story. Can't argue with these people using facts, they don't need no facts, they have a lifetime of being programmed.
Post a Comment