By Grand Rapids Anonymous
monday, september 15, 2025 at 1:42:00 a.m. edt
Brian Kilmeade, of Fox noise, stretches the rubber band of free speech--it snaps back--hitting him in that part of the body which makes one get on one's knees and beg for one's job
“ass(ociated) press: Fox noise channel host Brian Kilmeade apologized on sunday for advocating for the execution of mentally ill homeless people in a discussion on the network last week, saying his remark was 'extremely callous.
“I wrongly said that they should get lethal injections. I apologize.”
GRA: Hmmm, Kilmeade gets a little backlash and he caves in like an old coal mine. Can't trust HIM to be honest anymore.
--GRA
N.S.: My problem with Brian Kilmeade has always been that he's a brain-dead republican.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Kilmeade in the same sinking free speech boat as Kimmel and Gutman. Guess what--they're all White.
--GRA
Kilmeade would have been just fine if he had said "Welcome back to our Toronto studios. Next, CBC celebrates MAID, Medical Assistance In Dying. Canada's program is a model for advanced societies around the world, and in the case of the mentally ill, government mental health professionals serve as a safety valve in the process...."
Or as Jocelyn Elders might say, "Every death a planned and wanted death."
So what is free speech's--or its lack thereof's--definition? Was "free speech" denied,in the 1950s or earlier,when tv programs were not allowed to show men and women in the same bed or utter a fairly benign word,such as "damn"? Is the censorship of George Carlin's 7 dirty words,a repressive attack on free speech--or a simple attempt by overseers to steer a country's populace away from becoming common vulgarians--and who decides?(That sounded like a Phil Donahue rant).
I always write,let people say what they want--unless it leads to crime,but is that too relaxed an interpretation of free speech? Should the repercussions of one's opinion mean loss of job? All things being equal(which is impossible),I'd like to say "no," but as we keep moving inexorably towards anarchy,limits seem to be needed,in some defined way.
Social media has unleashed and reinforced segments of the "fringe" elements in the U.S.--and the world--to incite,inflame and provoke those genocidalists,whose agenda is to denounce and destroy White people. THEY seem to be able to say anything they want(until this week. That won't last long.). Networks and news organizations are onboard with attacking straight,Christian Whites and elevating lawless minorities--using lies and censorship when it suits them to do so.
Sixty years ago,the norms were known and accepted and the country was a much better place to live. These days,with low class blacks,mex,muslims and White communists taking control of more and more of our institutions,the rules of how to behave in a decent manner have been blurred --or erased.--and without a reset of some type,will likely not be seen again.
If we could only go back to 1963 and do it all over again.
--GRA
Post a Comment