By Grand Rapids Anonymous
monday, april 10, 2023 at 10:00:00 a.m. edt
“On Friday, a tree fell at augusta national’s 17th hole, causing play to be suspended. No one was injured.”
GRA: Did I ask if anyone was injured? If there was, I’m sure it would be reported.
This is one of my peeves about media reporting, the attempted reassurances about incidents of violence, from news stations, concerning the after-effects of a shooting. There are three levels of injury that media breathlessly reports to us after a shooting.
1. No one was injured;
2. The injuries “are not life-threatening”; and
3. The victim “was unable to be saved.”
My local stations LOVE to report the first two conditions—as if to tell everyone, everything is allllll right. Yes, bullets flew and people were hit, but “the injuries are not life threatening.” Never mind a kidney was struck or other body organ—they SURVIVED!
In other words, no biggie.
Or hey—no one was hit AT ALL! How about that? No injury or death resulting this time from black stupidity—said with a smile on the anchor’s face.
“A drive-by shooting sent hundreds of bullets into a house on the southeast side, but no one was injured.”
That lessens the attack and makes it seem insignificant—which it isn’t.
The cops and the media will tell us, AFTER a murder in which the perps have yet to be arrested, the victim “was in the wrong place at the wrong time,” or “there is no threat to the community.”
The cops and the media pulled the latter one recently, following a double murder in GR. Two days after there was “no threat to the community,” there was another double murder in retaliation for the first set.
But their favorite stunt is a diversion tactic, to tell of some White crime, whether it happened in the present, generations ago, or is simply a hoax.
That’s how the severity of black (and hispanic) crime gets de-emphasized on a daily basis.
And as stupid and lacking in credibility the aforementioned tactics are, they wear down Whites’ resistance to the destruction of their country.
--GRA
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
"the victim 'was in the wrong place at the wrong time,' "
Normally in many of these circumstances the victim has every right to be where they were at the time circumstances occurred. Wrong place wrong time suggests randomness which is quite often not so.
Post a Comment