-----Original Message-----
From: Recusal Alert [People For] <alerts@pfaw.org>
To: Add1dda@aol.com
Sent: Wed, Mar 9, 2022 4:15 p.m.
Subject: [petition] Demand that Justice Thomas recuse himself from insurrection cases -->
From: Recusal Alert [People For] <alerts@pfaw.org>
To: Add1dda@aol.com
Sent: Wed, Mar 9, 2022 4:15 p.m.
Subject: [petition] Demand that Justice Thomas recuse himself from insurrection cases -->
![]() People For supporter -- please add your name to help us get to 25K supporters calling for Justice Clarence Thomas's recusal TODAY (we're already more than 60% of the way there)! People For supporter, In January, the Supreme Court ruled on a request by Trump to block the release of White House records to the House Select Committee investigating January 6. Justice Clarence Thomas was the sole dissenter in the 8-1 ruling, arguing in favor of allowing Trump to keep the truth about what happened that day hidden.[1] Aside from the red flags this raises about Justice Thomas' ideological – and perhaps partisan – extremism, the decision should sound the alarm for all Americans concerned about Supreme Court justices' adherence to basic standards of ethics. And here's why: A new in-depth investigation by The New York Times Magazine further reveals the significant involvement of Justice Thomas's wife Ginni Thomas in far-right extremist movements, including efforts to overturn the 2020 election, provide support to the so-called "Stop the Steal" movement, and bury the truth about the January 6, 2021 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.[2] There have been concerns for a long time that Justice Thomas has not been able to draw a clear line of separation between his responsibilities as a Supreme Court justice and the extremist political activities of Ginni Thomas, which go back decades. It's become clear that Justice Thomas cannot be trusted to be a fair arbiter in cases involving the far-right political movements in which his wife has been and remains deeply involved. And with our whole system of government itself under perhaps the greatest threat it's ever faced, by insurrectionists and other pro-Trump authoritarians, we cannot afford to have someone on the Supreme Court eager to side with the enemies of democracy. Supreme Court justices are not currently bound by the same ethics rules that apply to all other federal court judges. So removing Justice Thomas's influence in these cases is vital to protecting against impropriety and making sure justices' personal political allegiances don't put them at odds with defending our constitutional democracy. Justice Thomas should not have been involved in the White House records case and should recuse himself from further cases involving such subject matter. Thank you for everything you do, – Ben Betz, Director of Digital & Organizing Source: [1] "In Rebuke to Trump, Supreme Court Allows Release of Jan. 6 Files." (The New York Times, 1/19/2022.) [2] "The Long Crusade of Clarence and Ginni Thomas." (The New York Times, 2/22/2022.)
|





7 comments:
Like he's going to listen.It blows my mind that conservatives place a black like Thomas on a pedestal and bow to him.It also amazes me that liberals are not satisfied with an 8-1 vote against Trump.It also sickens me that the GOP backs blacks to run against liberal Whites.
Putting blacks into office is not the solution to stopping the replace Whitey movement.That's what THEY want!They being blacks.
Jeezus.
--GRA
There has never been anything American about People for the American Way--they are leftist statists and always have been. On the other hand, Justice Thomas is American through and through--the one justice who you can always count on even when all the rest sell us out. The leftists on the Supreme Court don't recuse themselves when they are clearly biased. If you pray, pray for Justice Thomas's health because once he is gone, we will never see another like him. And read his autobiography so to better understand his greatness.
The 'tolerant' Left.
PFAW deserves a tiny bit of credit for making their IRS filings easily accessible (uncommon in my experience) -- you can view them here: link
Interesting is that many key people seem to make pretty good money for part-time work -- also Alec Baldwin is a director.
Ben Jealous is the current CEO (link) -- even though he's mixed race (half black), he seems to have done quite well -- yet despite that, and even though per their filings he seems to be only a part-time CEO of PFAW, he works full-time in the racial grievance industry.
Jealous earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in political science from Columbia University. A Rhodes Scholar, he later earned a Master of Science in comparative social research from St Antony's College, Oxford.
Typical of America's elite, regardless of race, he spent his time in higher education in the liberal arts, the refuge of inferior intellects.
It says his mother is biracial -- here she is on LinkedIn: link
She is the author, with Caroline Haskell, of Combined Destinies: Whites Sharing Grief about Racism (2013)
And:
His father, Fred Jealous, who is white, is descended from settlers of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, related to businessman Joseph B. Sargent, and directly in line to inherit the fortune from the Sargent and Co business.
So I guess 'the apple doesn't fall far from the tree', as they say.
After de-segregating Baltimore, they got the hell out so they wouldn't have to experience the mess:
Jealous was born in 1973 in Pacific Grove, California and grew up on the Monterey Peninsula.
Do they ever notice the difference between Baltimore, which has lots of Blacks, and the Monterey Peninsula, where there are hardly any?
RONNIE JACKSON SAYS BIDEN HAD HIS WORST DAY TALKING YET.
"Biden was LOST today. He announced he had COVID. He confused his wife with Kamala. He confused HIMSELF with Kamala’s husband. Then he fumbled remembering the name of his UN Ambassador. All in under 15 minutes. This is BAD! He needs a COGNITIVE EXAM now!!"
GRA:The reincarnated Andy Rooney had Biden correctly analyzed 14 months ago.
--GRA
I'm going to be in the minority here, but I hope they punish these Jan 6 idiots to the extent the law allows. Life is hard enough for conservatives and Trump supporters, without these fucking yahoos demonstrating every stereotype the left alleges of the right. Punish them harshly, make examples of them.
Bradley:
It didn't even qualify as a "half-assed" attempt at an insurrection.It DID show tptb how easy it would be to effect one though--which is what scares them.
Speaking of which,what happened to the convoy?
--GRA
It was no insurrection--the insurrection happened in November when they stole the election. These demonstrators were not armed and not trying to overthrow the government--they were trying to get their representatives to show some backbone and stop the steal. The Capitol Police opened the doors for them--it was a setup. Wake up and stop with the Mainstream Marxist Media lies.
Post a Comment