Wednesday, April 05, 2023

The seed for our metastasizing woes

N.S.: The left lies about everything. If a leftist tells you, "It's raining outside," you still have to go and check.

Back in September or October, 2021, a leftist relative of mine who, like me, lives in nyc, claimed to me, "The subways are safe."

(Then again, the Chicago News Bureau, which used to train the city's reporters, famously told each trainee, "If your mother says she loves you, check it out.")

I go 20-30 years at a time avoiding my relatives.

"Slavery": The left feigns to be obsessively against slavery, but it is obsessively for slavery, White slavery. In America, White slavery was revived by Johnson's so-called war on poverty in 1965, in which congress began pickpocketing Whites of tens of trillions of dollars on behalf of blacks and then hispanics... and it keeps getting worse.

The left is totalitarian, and its goal has long been White genocide, because Whites create all the wealth it seeks to steal, and because Whites are its obstacle to total power. And the left's best friend has been the gop.


By An Old Friend
Wed, Apr 5, 2023 8:09 p.m.

The seed for our metastasizing woes

This isn't explicitly about immigration.  But our immigration woes largely go back to 1965's Immigration and Nationality Act Amendments (the Hart-Celler bill), best understood as 1964's civil-rights laws extended to the whole world, a reification of western civilization's suddenly-developed guilt complex about the (purported) foulness of "discrimination."

And where did that guilt complex come from?  In a word: slavery.  And more particularly, african slavery in british north america.  

Nearly all of our current societal dysfunction goes back to slavery.  That's not because slavery was involved in everything but because the culture of trumped-up grievance was launched off of slavery, and this formed the model for all the other fronts in grievance culture. 

So the following quote from Roger Kimball needs frequent, widespread repetition (it's not possible to overuse it):

If chattel slavery hadn't existed in the united states, the left would have had to invent it. what we mean is that the idea of slavery has become so dear to the disciples of identity politics that without its moral sanction they would be lost. absent the original sin of slavery, the entire racialist racket that holds our society hostage would sputter to an inglorious halt. the race hustlers promoting "affirmative action" (i.e., race- or sex-based discrimination) would be out of business, as would the real-estate magnates and firebugs of black lives matter. ditto the angry historical fantasists behind the 1619 project. forget that most societies practiced slavery throughout history. is anyone asking for "reparations" because their ancestors may have been enslaved by the Egyptians, the Persians, the Greeks, or the Romans? forget that slavery ended in the united states more than one hundred and fifty years ago because Abraham Lincoln prosecuted a brutal civil war to keep the country together and end the "peculiar institution," which was not peculiar at all. (when, by the way, will slavery end in islamic society, or india, or china?) the world has had numerous long-distance trades in slaves of different phenotypes. most of the west african slaves who made their way to america were sold into servitude by black african slavers.
those impolitic facts are what the Bolsheviks of old called "counterrevolutionary." that is, they are politically "false" even if empirically true. the wardens of wokeness tell us that they hate slavery and its legacy. doubtless in one sense they do. but they are divided in their minds. they also cherish the historical fact of slavery. for one thing, they understand that it is their irrevocable meal ticket. they also perceive that it is an imperishable source of emotional power. because it is a wound that can never heal, it is also a sin that White society can never expiate—which is why they tell the world that the legacy of slavery is ubiquitous and ineradicable. But if that were true, why should anyone have ever bothered to campaign against it? it would be like campaigning against the onset of night.
we understand that to ask such questions is to be guilty of "racism," the cardinal tort of our age whose almost aphrodisiac power is ultimately guaranteed by the inexhaustible well of victimhood that slavery, or the exploitation of the idea of slavery, has dug. Martin Luther King Jr. [oh, no!] famously dreamed that people would be judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin. that is now regarded as a reactionary, indeed a racist sentiment. after all, to judge people by their character, by what they actually do, would upset the entire racialist concession. from now on, race is everything, character a dispensable epiphenomenon. and the ultimate power source, the inexhaustible kernel of animus that fuels the racialist requisition, is the historical accident of chattel slavery in the United States.

A few factual points about slavery, as supplement to what Kimball wrote:

1. Slavery in Britain's North American colonies and subsequent U.S. states has been tagged as especially heinous and cruel.  But in those areas, slaves survived to have families, and their population grew partly from natural increase.  In contrast, slaves among the ~20-times-greater fraction of the trans-Atlantic slave trade that went to Caribbean sugar plantations and to Brazil were generally worked to death (hence the much greater influx -- for replacement).

2. More whites were taken as slaves to muslim North Africa than blacks taken to British North America.  The Muslim corsairs "harvested" slaves from the north shore of the Mediterranean but also from as far afield as Ireland and Iceland (!).  The lives of many of them were hellish: white skin subjected to the broiling Mediterranean sun as galley slaves.

3. More black Africans were sold into the slave trade that went to the muslim Middle East than into the trans-Atlantic slave trade, and their death-toll percentage in just reaching their enslavement destinations was very high.

4. Beyond all that, slavery was nearly universal among human societies, as Candace Owens laid out in this five-minute Prageru video: https://www.prageru.com/video/a-short-history-of-slavery  Toward the end, she's saying things like in that Kimball quote above about slavery as the irreplaceable fount of grievance for the Left.
 

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

It's either going to be us or them that gets wiped out.I vote THEM.

--GRA

Anonymous said...

"More whites were taken as slaves to muslim North Africa than blacks taken to British North America. The Muslim corsairs "harvested" slaves from the north shore of the Mediterranean "

Barbary pirates. Slave raids to capture Europeans went on for nearly a thousand years.