PayPal

Monday, January 15, 2018

Twelve Reasons Why Martin Luther King Day Should be Abolished

 

 

By Nicholas Stix

1. King was such a bad man that his widow, Coretta Scott King, had to get a federal judge to place his FBI files under wraps until 2027, or there would have been scandal upon scandal, which would have either imperiled the movement to have a national holiday named for him, or at least have made such a movement look as ridiculous as it really was;

2. King is an idol like Mohammed. The holiday in his name therefore sanctifies every bad thing he ever did;

3. King was a serial plagiarist, who stole his title as a “Dr.” at Boston University from a white man, Jack Stewart Boozer. The King cult has helped destroy academic standards in America;

4. He was one of the greatest adulterers in American history, having literally had a girl (many girls, actually) or a prostitute (no disrespect to working girls intended) in every port. Thus has the King cult helped to destroy sexual morality in America;

5. He supported violence, declaring “Riots are the voice of the voiceless.” By his own admission, he deliberately used the so-called principle of non-violence to incite violence;

6. He degraded the black church into a partisan political organization that routinely violates the tax laws, and violates the very “constitutional principle” of the “separation of church and state” (never mind that no such principle exists in the constitution) that supporters of the King cult ruthlessly and one-sidedly impose on white Christians;

7. He was the most powerful supporter of Communism that this country had ever seen. He surrounded himself with Communists, and took their money: Stanley Levison, Hunter Pitts “Jack” O’Dell, Stanley Levison, Bayard Rustin, Myles Horton, Zilphia Horton, The Rev. Fred Shuttlesworth, Carl Braden, Anne Braden, James A. Dombrowski, Aubrey Williams, Abner W. Berry, Ahmed Ben Bella, et. al.;

8. He destroyed the concept of civil rights. As the most celebrated leader of the so-called civil rights movement, more appropriately called the black rights movement, which through verbal legerdemain took something that is the inheritance of every legal American citizen—civil or constitutional rights—he made them the private property of blacks, including blacks that aren’t even citizens;

9. He was America’s greatest orator, and did something that to my knowledge, no other major American orator has done. Whereas politicians typically wait for a later speech to contradict what they have claimed to be all that is near and dear to them, King accomplished this feat in the same, “I Have a Dream” speech. At different points in the speech, he both called on America to be guided by the principle of color-blindness, and to impose race-specific policies granting welfare and reparations programs to blacks. Thus did MLK contribute more than any other American to the degradation of oratory;

10. He undermined the rule of law in general, as something that only whites must obey, but which must serve blacks, and particularly the principle, enshrined in the 14th Amendment of equality under the law. The 1964 U.S. Civil Rights Act, which his cultists credit him with getting enacted, has served to relegate whites to the status of second-class citizens;

11. He was a traitor, and helped to mainstream treason. On April 4, 1967, he delivered a speech at New York’s Riverside Church which could have been written in Hanoi, and delivered via diplomat’s pouch, so true was it to Communist lies. King claimed to be speaking on behalf of peace, but it was the peace of the graveyard. He was acting as the advocate of the North Vietnamese Communists and their allies; and

12. His true beliefs were the opposite of the color-blindness to which he paid lip-service. At the time of his murder, he was in Memphis demanding hard racial quotas for all public service jobs, matching the black proportion of the populace, qualifications be damned.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is rather like being called ugly by a frog.

Anonymous said...

13.Unlike Reagan,he didn't know how to take a bullet(meaning,if he had lived to his 80s,would he still have received holiday status?)Along those lines,if Reagan had been assassinated,would there have been a national holiday named for HIM?Answer:Kennedy didn't--neither would have Reagan.
14.What's next...a Jesse Jackson or Malcom X Federal holiday in March?
15.Followed by Obama day,Maxine Waters day etc etc etc (in the new non-white America).It would continue with elimination of Columbus Day(white guy) and Veterans Day (too many whites were vets).
Whites must really start looking at the future in a very sober way.
---GR Anonymous

Anonymous said...

"King was such a bad man that his widow, Coretta Scott King, had to get a federal judge to place his FBI files under wraps until 2027"

As records sealed by I believe a colored judge cherry picked. And in 2027 they will get another fifty year extension on the sealing of the documents, etc.

Anonymous said...

"King was a serial plagiarist, who stole his title as a “Dr.” at Boston University from a white man, Jack Stewart Boozer."

Those persons that awarded KKKing his doctorate even said EVEN IF THEY HAD KNOWN THE MAN WAS A CHEAT THEY WILL WOULD STILL HAVE GIVEN HIM THE PhD!!

Anonymous said...

"14.What's next...a Jesse Jackson or Malcolm X Federal holiday in March?"

DON'T THEM ANY IDEAs!1

Anonymous said...

"He degraded the black church into a partisan political organization that routinely violates the tax laws,"

Correct. NO exemption from taxes only if you do not preach politics from the pulpit.