[“Tucker Carlson: 'Nations are defined by the people who live in them (video).”]
By Anonymous
monday, october 16, 2023 at 1:47:00 a.m. edt
Carlson is a civic nationalist. He *explicitly* denigrates White racial identity and racial consciousness. He makes fun of racially conscious Whites. He says that’s a “Nazi idea.”
https://www.unz.com/article/tucker-carlson-on-white-identity-politics
In fact he’s known as Cucker Carlson. See 35 minutes in this video:
https://odysee.com/@whiterabbitradio:9/2023EExLive5AprilWFW:f
“But this idea that someone of a certain skin color, any skin color, or any ethnic background speaks automatically on behalf of all people who share that skin color or ethnic background is a Nazi idea, and I’m totally opposed to it.”
He’s not an advocate for White people or White America. On this question he is a child. The author of the article explains it:
“A lot of conservatives don’t like identity politics because it bases political representation on something that we don’t choose: our identities. This, of course, is a deeply liberal assumption, namely that anything unchosen is illegitimate.”
So, on this he has a mindset that’s identical to the political Left.
He’s mostly an entertainer.
Boomers are so desperate they latch onto anything.
N.S.: Tucker Carlson triangulates. However, you’re off the rails. Your thought processes are too simple-minded. Carlson spoke, among others things, of democrats rigging elections through letting millions of third-worlders cross the border. That was practically a word-for-word quotation of what my old vdare colleague, Steve Sailer, has been saying for years.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Yes, Tucker Carlson triangulates. If he was a cuckservative, or a "cuck," as I prefer to call them, he would still have his Fox News Channel job.
jerry pdx
Carlsen does have to be realistic if he wanted to keep his job, if he "went there" on the subject of racial identity, he'd spend all his time fending off accusations of racism and would have been fired from his mainstream gig. Maybe he just put on a certain facade to get other messages through to a mass audience. I don't know what he really believes, I just hope so. Of course he got fired from Fox anyways so I wonder if he'll change some of what he says in the future.
But Tucker Carlson is the best that "we've" got. (Without getting into the impossible, like Nicholas Stix guest-hosting the Tonight Show, with guests Steve Sailer and Natalie Winters.)
I think we need to be thankful for the good stuff Tucker has been saying. His online presence is a big nyaah-nyaah to Fox News.
"Your thought processes are too simple-minded."
This is GOP conservatard nonsense. The time for such limp-wristed equivocation is LONG PAST.
There is nothing "simple-minded" about explicitly advocating for white identity and group self-interest in the face of toxic rhetoric about "white privilege" and "institutional racism", which is indoctrinating non-whites, who will soon be the majority, to resent Whites as cruel racist oppressors who benefited from unfair "privilege".
To state the obvious: with the removal of statues, monuments, etc, the *physical elimination phase* of "diversity" has already begun. Any White who believes it will stop there is naive and a coward. BLM in 2020 showed they will not stop violence if it is racially inconvenient, and that continues today. So Whites who believe next time authorities will stop non-white mobs from going to white suburbs to burn homes and loot are just as mistaken.
Where is there evidence of good will for Whites coming from non-whites? I see none.
Look into what happened in Haiti early in the 19th century.
Not to mention it is open season on Whites in university admissions, employment, etc.
Racial/tribal animus has been the norm in human evolutionary social history. As was the struggle of races and tribes and ethnic groups to acquire and keep/defend secure living space. What's going on now, Whites allowing themselves to be displaced by racial aliens as the majority population *in their own countries*, is deeply unnatural and a mistake that threatens the existence of Whites as a coherent, self-governing group. This is the proper context of the rhetoric about "white genocide".
No other ethnic group would ever allow this, and for very good reasons. They viscerally identify it as a direct threat to PEOPLE LIKE THEM.
Try to imagine mestizos in Mexico ever allowing gringos to become the majority in Mexico. You cannot imagine it because of how absurd and unnatural the idea is.
This is just visceral common sense and should not have to be stated.
Steve Sailer is a faggot who has written a lot more about black ghetto thugs killing each other, which is a FEATURE of BLM, not a bug, and nothing for any self-respecting white man to care about, than he has about opioid deaths, which are deaths of despair that overwhelming affect Whites.
Not only that, there are FAR MORE opioid deaths every year than homicides, let alone black-on-black homicides.
Verify it yourself: use the UR search function to search his posts for "homicide" vs "opioid".
10+ full pages of results for "homicide"
https://www.unz.com/?s=homicide&Action=Search&authors=steve-sailer&ptype=isteve
Barely 2 pages of results for "opioid"
https://www.unz.com/?s=opioid&Action=Search&authors=steve-sailer&ptype=isteve
Per recent data, there were 21,156 murders reported in 2022.
https://news.yahoo.com/fbi-says-us-murders-dropped-191927816.html
There were 5x as many opioid/overdose deaths, 105,452:
https://blogs.cdc.gov/nchs/2023/05/18/7365/
Which problem is greater and deserves more attention? Which problem overwhelmingly affects Whites? Yet he writes about nigger ghetto homicide to signal his virtue to the Establishment: "See, I'm not a racist. I care about all the useless young black criminal thugs killing each other."
At this point in time it is sick and disgusting.
Sailer is also a civic nationalist, except the coward does not have the guts to call himself that because he knows he will be ridiculed. Instead he calls himself an "anti-racist citizenist conservative" (whatever that is). Imagine writing for YEARS AND YEARS about irremediable human biological differences, and then not having the guts to openly recognize and state how bad "diversity" is for white people and and white society.
https://www.takimag.com/article/civil-rights-gone-wrong/
"Caldwell offers cold comfort to anti-racist citizenist conservatives like myself"
And Tucker Carlson is a cuck and a faggot for saying white racial consciousness is a "Nazi idea". He didn't have to say that. He could have phrased it differently or kept his mouth shut. Instead he chose to denigrate white identity as a "Nazi idea". What a piece of shit.
"too simple-minded"
In the face of white replacement and increasing demonization of whites and destruction of their history and cultural heritage, seems a bit naive to characterize demands that prominent whites with a platform actually stand up for whites and their interests as "too simple-minded".
Maybe guys like Carlson could at least not call white collective self-interest a "Nazi idea"? Is that too much to ask? Every other race is allowed to have a racial identity and pursue their collective self-interest, right? Why not white people?
When will that be ok for whites with people like Carlson? Will it ever be ok?
At this point in time gate keepers like Carlson are a problem, despite the good he otherwise does. He should at least stop with the "Nazi idea" stuff. That's not asking too much.
This is the kind of dumb, naive, race flat earth thinking that is destroying and will fully destroy white people and white civilization:
https://twitter.com/gummibear737/status/1714024176468496497
"Your skin color, your race, your religion, your culture, your sexual identity…they’re all irrelevant
Do you share the basic common values that define western civilization?
If not then go somewhere else"
This person describes himself as an "Open-minded Conservative."
Carlson would probably say the same thing about himself. He's an "Open-minded Conservative."
These people are definitely part of the problem in white society and for its future today, no matter what else they may be doing and saying and what their other political opinions might be.
Infinity Africans? Sure, why not, as long as they say they share "the basic common values that define western civilization."
It's so obviously beyond ridiculous.
Post a Comment