By Jerry PDX
saturday, july 22, 2023 at 12:19:00 a.m. edt
Samuel Little gets a mention by three washington post writers, Wesley Lowery, Hannah Knowles, and Mark Berman, but it’s not the kind of attention they give to White serial killers:
https://getpocket.com/explore/item/the-perfect-victim
This is one of those articles that shows some of the differences in how the media treats White serial killers vs. black serial killers. The writers of the article are not trying to understand Little, or what motivated him but to blame (White) society for failing to protect against him. Since Little’s victims were (primarily) non- White women or on the margins of society, that society didn’t care about them going missing. Something the recent initial hysteria about Carlee Russell seems to disprove. Check out this paragraph:
“‘If these women had been wealthy, White, female socialites, this would have been the biggest story in the history of the united states. But that’s not who he preyed upon,’ said criminologist Scott Bonn, who has written extensively about serial killers.”
[N.S.: So much for Scott Bonn. Last night, I read some terrible reviews of Bonn’s serial killer book. Someone said he was just re-doing work by Peter Vronsky, so I ordered Vronsky’s Sons of Cain: A History of Serial Killers from the Stone Age to the Present (2018). Vronsky acts as though blacks played a minimal role in the ranks of serial killers in “America” (GRA), instead of dominating them, as Justin Cottrell demonstrated in 2012, in Rise of the Black Serial Killer.
David in TN has debunked such nonsense so many times, but it’s apparently never enough. The msm publicize disappeared White females, as David notes, because they have likely been murdered, and in the past that would almost certainly mean they had been murdered by a White man. The same msm have less interest in covering the cases of missing/murdered black females, because their murderers will almost certainly turn out to be black males, and the last thing the msm want to do is report on black murderers. Another reason for the
Two major reasons for the rise in black serial killers, I believe, are de-policing in black neighborhoods, and blacks’ and the msm’s support of all black criminals.]
Waitasecond...If victims being street people or non-White mean a serial killer doesn’t get as much attention, then why did Dahmer and Ridgeway get turned into superstars? Didn’t seem to occur to the authors of this article.
Sure, if Little had been able to murder 93 White, wealthy socialites the story would have been bigger but there's no way Little would have been able to kill that many women in that social class because they weren't going to jump into a car with him thinking he was a john, or because he offered them some crack. However, if Samuel Little was a White man and had the same number and type of victims, it would have been the biggest story in the history of the United States.
The writers are actually on to something, in a way, but the protection afforded to Little was because he was black and it was woke White liberals that protected him. If White society is to blame, it’s that segment of White society, not the Whites that want to hold blacks responsible for their behavior.
By Grand Rapids Anonymous
saturday, july 22, 2023 at 3:00:00 p.m.
Media isn’t interested in black underbelly crime—there’s so much of it—a great deal of it vile and violent. negro nightly news could easily fill a half hour of various black crime EVERY NIGHT, but have chosen to ignore it. Who decided that? Holt is the main editor, but he’s in sync with Brian Roberts, the ceo—who is a pro-black liberal and has stated so.
--GRA
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
"but to blame (White) society for failing to protect against him."
So what's wrong with that, actually?
Sometimes "(White) society" might deserve some of the blame.
If you look into the case of Billy Chemirmir, who killed a number of elderly women in Texas (all white I think) over a significant period of time, it is very clear that shoddy, uncaring work by police, and even coroners, a big majority of whom were no doubt white, allowed him to continue killing long after he should have been identified as a suspect and arrested.
Do you not think that, in such cases of multiple killings, this kind of thing should be examined? And exposed if it was the case that "(White) society failed to protect against him"?
Because it is clear that due to their sloppy incompetence, law enforcement did not protect other women from being murdered by Billy Chemirmir.
washington post= dishonest reporting.
nbc news uses the washington post for a number of its stories(but then declares,they cannot verify the information they utter from them.)
Therefore,nbc news=dishonest reporting x 2.
--GRA
Our late friend, Lawrence Auster, wrote about how liberals obfuscate black crime. He wrote something like:
"First they deny it. Next, they make excuses for it. Finally they just attack White people."
These "journalists" followed the template.
jerry pdx
"First they deny it. Next, they make excuses for it. Finally they just attack White people."
Go through that routine nearly every debate I get into with them. To elaborate a bit more how it goes:
"First they deny it, then when presented with facts they say "White racism made them do it" (forgetting that they denied it in the first place), then they triumphantly call you a racist for pointing out the truth", knowing that attaching that label to you becomes the focus rather than actual facts you've presented.
Post a Comment