Wednesday, October 18, 2023
Nicholas Lemann’s nazi morality: An Addendum to “Racist Pornography: Short Mockumentary on the Brief Life of Violent, Racist black Shoplifter, Latasha Harlins Has been Nominated for an Oscar; See the Trailer Here”
[“Racist Pornography: Short Mockumentary on the Brief Life of Violent, Racist black Shoplifter, Latasha Harlins Has been Nominated for an Oscar; See the Trailer Here.”]
Postscript, october 18, 2023: One of the propagandists who spread the blood libel, whereby black supremacists had some sort of “right” to burn down l.a., in response to Mrs. Soon Ja Du’s killing of Latasha Harlins, was White writer Nicholas Lemann, in his 1999 book, The Big Test: The Secret History of the American Meritocracy.
Harlins had decided to shoplift some orange juice in the Du family convenience store in the racist, black hellhole of south central los angeles. Normally, Mrs. Du’s son would work the counter, but a racist black gang had threatened to kill him, and so his mother was protecting him by working the counter that day.
Harlins put the orange juice in her backpack, and then proceeded to the front door, making a pass, as if she’d planned to pay, with $2 in a hand. However, she didn’t pay. Mrs. Du grabbed her, as Harlins sought to leave, whereupon the strapping, 150-lb teenager, who had a punch like a man, brutally beat the middle-aged woman, and proceeded to try and leave. Mrs. Du ran back to her counter, grabbed a pistol she had tucked away underneath it, and shot Harlins dead in the back of her head.
Mrs. Du shouldn’t have been charged with any crime, but things being what they were, the alliance of black supremacists, their White allies, and their institutionalized racism towards hard-working east asian businessmen had an easy time rigging a prosecution of Mrs. Du.
As Lou Cannon argued in his monumental 1997 work on the 1992 racist, black los angeles riots, Official Negligence: How Rodney King and the Riots Changed Los Angeles and the LAPD, a prison sentence for Mrs. Du, in a state prison with no fellow koreans to protect her, would have been tantamount to a death sentence. Thus, compassionate jurist, judge Joyce A. Karlin, sentenced Mrs. Du to probation. Judge Karlin sacrificed her career, and almost her life, in order to save Soon Ja Du’s life.
And what does that case have to do with the scholastic aptitude test (sat)? Nothing, except that democrat propagandist Nicholas Lemann desperately sought to force it to have something to do with it.
The Big Test was supposed to be about the scholastic aptitude test (sat).
As my old vdare colleague, Steve Sailer wrote in his review, Lemann was supposed to write an exposé of the sat, only he found nothing to expose. Thus, Lemann instead padded out the book with a gossipy, entertaining history about the test’s founders; a blood libel against model minority members like the Du family; and support of what I came to dub the ugly asian movement—morally and intellectually inferior asians who have been waging war on model minority asians, Whites, and merit; and genocidal, black supremacists and the regime of racial spoils.
The blood libel was Lemann’s assertion that Mrs. Du’s killing of Latasha Harlins justified blacks’ commission of mass murder, looting, and arson.
Lemann implied that one korean killing one racist, black thug justified thousands of black supremacist thugs murdering 53 people, looting, burning down large swathes of los angeles, and causing $1 billion in property damage.
Supporters of Harlins also took as a matter of course that Harlins had a right to shoplift from the Du family’s store, and to brutally beat Mrs. Du when the latter tried to protect her property.
Lemann was careful to also lie by omission: He never mentioned that in the previous year alone, as fellow liberal journalist Lou Cannon had already chronicled in Official Negligence, blacks had slaughtered nine korean convenience store clerks in racist hate crime murders. Thus, if koreans had the same rights as blacks, they should have burned down, looted, and engaged in mass slaughter in black neighborhoods like south central los angeles nine times, slaughtering 477 blacks, and wreaking $9 billion in property damage.
(During Nicholas Lemann’s tenure as dean of the columbia university school of journalism, a racist black monster named Robert Williams forced his way into the apartment of one of Lemann’s White students. Williams spent all night raping and torturing the young woman, and then sought to burn her alive. Williams tied her to her bed, drugged her, and set the bed on fire. It was only by incredible heroism that the victim was able to free herself and save her own life. The victim testified at Williams’ trial; he was sentenced to 422 years in prison, though he will surely be released on parole. Lemann never said Word One in condemnation of Robert Williams. Given Lemann’s support of black supremacism, it would be logical for him to support Robert Williams.) Thus was Lemann indulging in nazi morality. If you killed one nazi official, they slaughtered your entire village.
I read about that particular nazi slaughter (in Poland, I believe) in William L. Shirer’s monumental, 1960 work, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich when I was seven years old. Some things leave quite an impression on a seven-year-old mind.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
The British parachuted some Czech agents into Czechoslovakia to kill the Nazi Gauleiter, Reynard Heydrich. The British expected and hoped Hitler would order reprisals. Heydrich had been one of the architects of the Holocaust and organized the Einsatzgruppen. He had been ruling the Czechs in relatively benign fashion.
Hitler, with his usual brutal stupidity, did exactly that. He ordered the city of Lidice destroyed and razed to the ground, killing the inhabitants, as well.
What can I say about Lemann,except ignoring the truth doesn't change it.
--GRA
"Racist black Shoplifter"
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1991-10-01-me-3692-story.html
What makes her a racist? Because she shoplifted from a store owned by Asians? If you've ever been to any large or medium size city in Calif, they are pretty hard to avoid. Just like it can be hard to find a small motel that isn't owned or operated by dot Indians.
Did the victim have a history of violence or racism? She was only 15. And female.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Latasha_Harlins#Death
"Du observed Harlins putting a $1.79 bottle of orange juice in her backpack. Du concluded Harlins was attempting to steal, and did not see the money Harlins held in her hand. ...
After speaking with the two eyewitnesses present and viewing the videotape of the incident, recorded by a store security camera, the police concluded that Harlins intended to pay for the beverage with money in hand. The videotape showed that Du grabbed Harlins by her sweater and snatched her backpack. Harlins then struck Du with her fist twice, knocking Du to the ground. After Harlins backed away, Du angrily threw a stool at her. Harlins then tried to flee the scene, but Du reached under the counter, retrieved a revolver, and fired at Harlins from behind at a distance of about three feet (one meter). The gunshot struck Harlins in the back of the head, killing her instantly."
Odd to put something you intend to buy/pay for in your backpack, but then if Du saw her maybe she wasn't trying to hide the action and did intend to pay. Who knows? I sometimes go to the store with a cloth bag, and put stuff into it as I shop, rather than taking one of those big metal carts and pushing it around.
Seems like disproportionate even extreme use of force to shoot someone in the head over something as trivial as a $2 bottle of orange juice. And the video apparently did show that Du started the altercation.
Would like to see the original surveillance video, not the movie depiction of the killing.
Anyway, a female judge only gave the Asian woman probation and a fine, so there isn't much to complain about.
Not seen the movie. Not interested. But there is such a thing as proportionate use of force, and to take the life of another in that way and in those circumstance should not escape scrutiny. The woman who fired the gun was not in any mortal danger. And per the LAT article her lawyer actually said it was unintentional:
"In his opening statement, Du’s attorney, Charles Lloyd, contended that Du pulled a handgun in self-defense and accidentally shot Harlins."
If the shooting was justified, why say it was an accident?
jerry pdx
A backpack is not something you put items in when shopping, most stores do not allow them for shopping and will often ask for them to be left at the counter. A cloth sack is an acceptable item to use for shopping which is why you use it and not a backpack. It's unclear if Harlins was buying anything else but if the orange juice was the only thing she was buying, why would she even bother to put it in a backpack?
I don't buy that anybody can say for sure she planned on paying. One of the tricks shoplifters use is to attempt to walk out with merchandise but have some money in hand in case somebody stops you, then you say: I was going to pay, see I have money!
The video of the incident is grainy and only show the moment when they start tussling but it's difficult to see details and if Du had good reason to believe Harlin was shoplifting, that's not starting the altercation but protecting her property.
The video only shows when the altercation was going on, didn't actually catch the beginning, so you can't tell if she was actually trying to walk past the cash register or had she stopped to pay. I have to wonder why the public is only getting that one excerpt. If there is a full one, I'd be willing to watch it but I'm unable to find one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Rh_7cE70Os
It's said that Du banged Harlins head against the counter but that doesn't show in the video, mostly you just see Harlins throwing punches then she casually walks away but the video doesn't show Harlins drawing and shooting.
Harlins threw some punches but stopped and was walking away, I can understand the anger that could cause someone to pull a gun and shoot but it's hard to call that a justified shooting. But on the other hand I couldn't call is 1st degree or even 2nd degree murder, I think the conviction of involuntary manslaughter was probably fair. Du did have her sentence suspended and she was placed under probation with special rules.
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/ca-court-of-appeal/1769555.html
Nobody knows for sure if Harlins was racist but I think the odds are pretty good she hated Whites and Koreans in equal measure. Just basing that on personal experience.
Watched the movie version of what happened but it's like all those movie version where negroes get themselves killed, makes them look like dindu nuffins saints. It was clearly slanted in favor of Harlins.
Post a Comment