[Video and transcript, Part I: here;
Part II: here;
Part III: here;
Part IV; and
Part VI, the Conclusion of Steve Sailer’s Speech.]
Over the course of this century, it’s become clearer that stoking fear and loathing of generic Americans is essential to the success of the modern Democratic Party. Thus the tearing down of statues and the promoting of hate hoaxes like Jussie Smollett and the tall tale told by Rolling Stone magazine about a fraternity initiation ritual gang-rape on broken glass.
An interesting question is how much do these recurrent patterns of Democratic anti-core behavior represent an overt conspiracy? Why do Democrats decide to do things that are in the interest of Democrats? There are multiple plausible explanations.
Consider the hilarious Haven Monahan hoax at the U. of Virginia promoted by Rolling Stone magazine in 2014.
It’s not hard to trace it back to the Obama Administration’s 2013 “Dear Colleague” letter to colleges about how the federal government demands that they crack down harder on fraternities under the guise of fighting “rape on campus.” The Obama White House then teamed up with leading media to start a moral panic about rapist fraternities (and simultaneously, rapist soldiers).
Why? Fraternities, in which young men build lifelong friendships, tend to give Democrats the willies.
So, when Rolling Stone climaxed a long series of hate articles in the prestige press about the fraternity menace with a massive story about a coed being gang raped on broken glass for three hours as a traditional part of the annual initiation, barely anybody in the media for a week raised the slightest doubt. After all, they’d all been running just slightly less lurid stories in response to the White House campaign, so they publicly endorsed it on Twitter even if the basic idea of seven frat pledges getting down on their hands and knees and then exposing an even more sensitive part of their anatomy to all that broken glass is stupid.
But that’s not the point, the point is that Core Americans are bad.
There are, however, several dangers facing the Democrats. The first is believing their own propaganda.
But controlling the Main Stream Media still has huge advantages. There’s little need to lie when you get to decide what is and what isn’t news. For example, the Rolling Stone hate hoax inspired campus Leftists to stage their own night of broken glass and smash the windows of an innocent fraternity house. But that isn’t news.
Emmett Till, on the other hand, is news. Emmett Till is always news.
Another danger for the Democrats is that their coalition of the fringes naturally competes among itself for power by being the marginalest of them all. Their ideology tends to give top honors to the most dysfunctional group, blacks, and the most crazy, transgenders.
[End of Part V.]
4 comments:
Our friend Steve Sailer likes to say his chief trait is Noticing. Does Steve "notice" that the extravagant worship of blacks by White people is never returned one iota? Not one iota.
jerry pdx
Elon Musk now consider "cis" to be a slur on Twitter:
https://thehill.com/homenews/4061600-musk-says-cis-cisgender-considered-slurs-on-twitter/
This is after Twitter rolled back a policy that banned “targeted misgendering or deadnaming of transgender individuals.”
Ok, Elon does something positive, then turns around and does something contradictory. What on earth could be wrong with somebody declaring they are "comfortable in skin"? How does that get defined as a "slur"? Is the thinking: If you call yourself cis as an affirmation of your heterosexuality or (White?) race, then you are putting down non hetero or non Whites? If black people used it, there's no way Musk would ban the term, then it would be praised as self affirming and positive. What's crazy is that it's not actually a term specific to sexuality of race, anybody could use it but it seems to be near exclusively used by White hetero people so therefore "it's a slur". What will they come up with next to silence confident secure hetero White people? So much for Elon Musks' free speech absolutism.
Soon,there'll be a tribunal--separate from Scotus--who will decide this nonsensical garbage.9 people--1 White,6 blacks and 2 queers.They will take each complaint and judge how we all must act--Whites,that is.blacks don't listen to orders on how to behave.
Whoopie will be the Chief judge and assorted other wacko blackos like Joy Reid and Ava Duvernay might volunteer to tell Whitey how to talk and live.Biden will order the tribunal have full authority to enforce these decisions.
Probably sooner than you think.Social media is close to this type of tyranny already,they just don't have the power--yet--except by pressuring companies and individuals.
--GRA
"Their ideology tends to give top honors to the most dysfunctional group, blacks, and the most crazy, transgenders."
I hate to think of what additional "dysfunctional" persons might be added to the list. Persons who rape chirrens and animals might be a start.
Post a Comment