The media demanded a rewrite, and Morgenthau was just the man to do it.
Reyes’ “confession” changed nothing about the evidence presented at trial. It was always known that other rapists got away: A small sample of semen on the jogger’s sock and cervix did not match any of the defendants'. That’s why, in her summation, prosecutor Elizabeth Lederer told the jury: "
Others who were not caught raped her and got away."
Now we know: Reyes was one of those who “got away.”
Unlike the confessions of the boys convicted of the attack, Reyes's confession would result in no punishment. To the contrary, he was rewarded with a highly desirable prison transfer. Coincidentally, his conscience struck only after he was imprisoned with one of the convicted Central Park rapists, Kharey Wise, who happened to be the leader of a prison gang.
To be extra sure that the psychopath was telling the truth:
-- Reyes was never given a polygraph test.
-- The police were prohibited from interviewing him.
-- In fact, the police were prevented from even reviewing transcripts of the D.A.’s interviews with Reyes.
-- The police were further barred from interviewing Reyes’ prison acquaintances -- who said he’d admitted to joining a rape already in progress after hearing the jogger’s screams.
Ah, the argy-bargy of our hallowed adversary system of justice!
The maniacally repeated claim that “
there was no physical evidence to tie the boys to the crime” is utter nonsense intended to fool the stupid.
What “physical evidence” were they expecting? There were no tire tracks, footprints, bullet casings or gun powder residue to be tested. The jogger’s pulverized body was found lying in a puddle of mud. The only conceivable “physical evidence” would be DNA.
But the use of DNA to solve crimes was nearly unheard of in 1989. No police force in the country would look for DNA to make a case. It was only about a year earlier that DNA had been used
for the first time in any criminal court in the U.S. 
(Florida).
The very month that the jogger was attacked, newspapers were excitedly reporting on a novel forensic technique, a “
still unfolding laboratory discovery
, a genetic ‘fingerprint’ created from the body's deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA” -- as the Chicago Tribune put it.
Even five years
later, DNA evidence wasn’t enough to convict O.J. Simpson.
Remember Robert Chambers, the “Preppie Killer”? He killed Jennifer Levin in Central Park three years before the Central Park wilding. Guess what? There was no “physical evidence” tying Chambers to Levin’s murder, either. Police solved it the same way they solved the Central Park rape case: circumstantial evidence and a confession.
Does anyone think Chambers is innocent? (No -- he’s white.)
Which reminds me: There was no “physical evidence” tying David Berkowitz to the Son of Sam killings. Nor was there any “physical evidence” tying John Gotti to the murder of Paul Castellano. There was no “physical evidence” tying Lee Harvey Oswald to President Kennedy’s assassination. Are they all innocent, too?
Hard to believe, but it was possible for crimes to be solved before 2001! (That's about when the use of DNA in criminal cases became
widespread.)
What the police had against the Central Park Five were detailed confessions, on videotape, given in the presence of their parents or adult relatives; the deeply incriminating statements of at least a half-dozen of their friends and acquaintances; and the defendants’ knowledge of facts about the crime that only the perpetrators would know.
We’ll review some of the guilt evidence next week.
2 comments:
All great arguments by Coulter,but if she's standing in the wilderness shouting the truth,who hears her?FOX doesn't have her on anymore (I don't believe),so where can she go to change minds?
Are newspaper columns relevant in 2019?Not that I know of.My local paper only prints 3 times a week and MAYBE has an editorial section on Sunday(just checked,no they don't). What used to be a collection of columns,that encompassed a spectrum of viewpoints on one page--has disappeared.
Which means,unless you are able to get on a friendly TV network,very few people interested in listening to the facts about this topic,will hear you.
Instead,you get Holt pushing the "wrongly convicted" theme on "Negro Nightly News",MSNBC and CNN doing all day propaganda for the CP5,and FOX being pretty quiet about it all.
If it wasn't for N.S.U.,I'd probably be brainwashed into thinking they were railroaded--like MSM is attempting to do to the rest of the country.
--GR Anonymous
In Robert Tanenbaum's early Butch Karp novels, the Manhattan DA was named "Sandy Bloom," a rich politician who had never tried a felony case. Tanenbaum obviously based "Bloom" on Morgenthau.
Post a Comment