he raped me on the phone! (part iii)

[“Who are Lauren Leydon-Hardy and Yoona Ha, and Why You Need to Know”; and

“bLACK msu coach invokes black law, to acquit himself of sexual misconduct (part ii)”]

White Woman says bLACK msu coach phone raped her (part iii)
By Grand Rapids Anonymous
sunday, september 10, 2023 at 1:29:00 p.m. edt

“(usa today) michigan state hired an outside title ix attorney to investigate the complaint. she finished her investigation in july. a formal hearing to determine whether Tucker violated the school’s policy banning sexual harassment and exploitation is scheduled for oct. 5 and 6, during the spartans’ bye week.

“the stakes are high for everyone.

“Tracy says Tucker is following through on a threat to ruin her career and reputation by painting her as a woman who mixes professional and personal relationships and files false reports. she fears he will undo her legacy.”

[N.S.: What “legacy”? feminazis call any attempt by a man to defend himself against false charges “retaliation,” and have gotten “retaliation” banned on most, if not all college campuses. Thus, a female can make any sort of scurrilous charges against a man, and he has no right to self-defense.]

“Tucker, who signed one of the most lucrative contracts in college sports history two years ago, could lose out on the roughly $80 million he is owed if michigan state fires him for cause, which would be a stunning fall from the elite ranks of college coaches.

[N.S.: Tucker never belonged in such ranks.]

“reached by usa today on his cellphone saturday night, Tucker hung up after a reporter mentioned the case. the university declined to comment, citing the need for confidentiality during investigations.

Photo caption: “Tucker watches a play during the spartans' game against central michigan at spartan stadium in east Lansing on sept. 1.

“usa today typically does not identify people who allege sexual harassment. Tracy agreed to be identified and shared more than 1,200 pages of case documents.

[N.S.: Wait a cotton-pickin’ minute here! I thought the deal with the msm was that they shielded rape accusers, while dragging the names of alleged rapists through the mud, which was already bad enough. Since when do they also shield women asserting they were “sexually harassed,” while dragging the names of the men they’ve accused through the mud? We’re in me-too hoax country here. feminazi privilege knows no bounds. I’ve had it with all shielding of women accusing men.]

“title ix, the federal law banning sex discrimination in education, requires schools to investigate allegations of sexual harassment that took place in the context of a school program or activity. Such claims are inherently difficult to adjudicate because of many of the factors at issue in this case: a lack of eyewitnesses and recordings, the passage of time and the thorniness of litigating consent.

[N.S.: usa today never qualified itself like that when it was destroying the lives of White men.]

--GRA