hispanic teacher refuses to respect Catholic school contract, and new york post editor supports her, while seeking to confuse readers

By N.S.

“n.j. supreme court sides with Catholic school that fired teacher over getting pregnant from premarital sex”

“When Victoria Crisitello was hired in 2011, she signed an acknowledgment that said she understood the school’s code of ethics that required staff to abide by Catholic law.”

Crisitello and her lawyer, Tom McKinney, thought that screaming the word, “Discrimination!” would unleash magical powers on her behalf. But what strange game is the post up to, running photos of Crisitello and what appear to be two different men? Is the editor insinuating that Crisitello actually was married? Or that it somehow didn’t matter if she was married, as long as she had a man—or two—in her life? The editor seeks to confuse readers on Crisitello’s behalf.

St. Theresa School did exactly as the contract that Victoria Crisitello signed stipulated. She had signed the contract in bad faith, and fought tenaciously for nine years, as if she were in the right. That’s bad faith, coming and going. (In her case, affirmative action group bad faith.)

Back when I was a kid (1960s-mid-'70s), unmarried females didn’t even think of getting knocked up while teaching in the PUBLIC schools. But in the age of racial socialism, all rules are out, except where normal, patriotic White men are concerned. In their case, even non-existent “rules” and imaginary “laws” count.

https://nypost.com/2023/08/16/nj-court-sides-with-st-theresa-school-in-firing-of-victoria-crisitello/