Harith Augustus, 37
By “W”
Just read about this in the WSJ. You probably have already seen the video clip showing this black guy shot by Chicago cops reaching for his gun. These body-cams are proving to be inconvenient for the “Blax-be- innocent” protesters.
A buddy writes:
Yet another life of an "aspiring rapper" taken before he could spew his hatred of white people before a national audience.
N.S.: So many whites listen to black supremacists, thinking the latter mean what they say: ‘Cops must wear body cams and use dash cams, to stop white supremacist cops from killing our black men.’
Police Departments across the country then dutifully spend hundreds of millions of white taxpayer dollars on the new technology. But when blacks attack white cops, and everything is caught on video, the black supremacists say… the same blasted lies they said in the pre-cam era!
What’s really going on is that black supremacists (app. 90% of blacks in the country) believe that blacks are under no obligation to obey “the white man’s law,” and celebrate all black-on-white crime, especially blacks who murder white cops.
Chicago Police Release Bodycam Footage of Harith Augustus: Daily Mail
Daily Mail
Published on Jul 15, 2018
Saturday's fatal police involved shooting that sparked [sic] violent protests [sic] in Chicago was captured on police body camera which shows the man who was killed was armed with a handgun. Harith Augustus, 37, was identified as the man who was shot by police by the Medical Examiner's office, according to the Chicago Tribune. In the video, released much earlier than expected by the Chicago Police Department, shows Augustus clearly had a gun holstered, as well as an additional magazine.
One can only say the righteous police shooting of Augustus “sparked” something, if one falsely assumes that blacks only riot when they have been wronged. And the English word for “violent protests” is “riots.” When a protest turns violent, it stops being a protest.
Like I always say, the Daily Mail just gets more and more pc.
4 comments:
Charles Payne rape update
GRA:I was watching FOX business today and Charles Payne was hosting for Cavuto,when I wondered to myself,whatever happened to the Payne rape accusations by white woman Scottie Nell Hughes last September.This was the latest news I could find.Meanwhile,one question:Why is Psyne still employed,while similar accusations(from decades ago)have led to firings and resignations by people like Charlie Rose,Bill O'Reilly etc.?
April 21,2018 (Bloomberg)A federal judge has ordered 21st Century Fox Inc. to face a lawsuit by a former Fox News panelist who claimed that Fox Business Network host Charles Payne raped her and that the company ignored her complaint.
The ruling Tuesday by U.S. District Judge William Pauley in New York is a blow to Fox as the company confronts a series of sexual harassment allegations. The judge narrowed the suit by Scottie Nell Hughes but said Hughes had alleged enough facts for some of her claims to move forward. Pauley didn't rule on the merits while denying Fox's bid to dismiss the case in its entirely.
Fox News previously called the lawsuit a "publicity stunt" that has no merit and "is downright shameful." Payne, the host of "Making Money" on Fox Business, has called the complaint baseless.
Hughes says she became a victim of a public-relations smear campaign after telling an outside law firm — which last June was investigating sexual harassment at the network — that Payne had raped her in 2013.
According to her complaint, her name was leaked to the National Enquirer and the tabloid was given a "self-serving statement," allegedly drafted by Payne, that expressed his sorrow at having engaged in an affair with Hughes.
The lawsuit names Fox, Fox News, Payne and two other individuals associated with the company.
Fox News and a lawyer for Payne didn't immediately return requests for comment. Doug Wigdor, a lawyer for Hughes, declined to comment. In his opinion, Pauley allowed claims of gender bias and retaliation to go forward while dismissing claims of defamation.
Hughes also won an order blocking four subpoenas to men who formerly had affairs with her. The subpoenas sought communications of a "sexual or romantic" nature, information about Hughes' background and reputation, and any media files "of a sexual or romantic nature" featuring her.
"Injecting this case with Hughes' rendezvous with non-parties who have no connection to the subject matter of this litigation will only detract the parties — and later, a jury — from the real issues underlying Hughes' grievance," Pauley wrote in a separate ruling.
"The defendants' purported strategy is superficially appealing, but advances a boorish, reductive narrative that Hughes was predisposed to engaging in self-serving sexual relationships," he wrote. "Hughes' prior sexual history has no relevance to her claims against Payne, or the defense that she used Payne to advance her career at Fox."
Fox News has been buffeted by allegations of sexual harassment. Founder Roger Ailes was ousted in 2016 after women including former anchor Gretchen Carlson made accusations against him. Former star Bill O'Reilly was forced out last year after complaints by several women.
---GR Anonymous
Evidently Harith had a concealed carry permit. Why then did he not comply the orders of the cops and just explain it all and produce his concealed carry permit?
It has been a couple of years that the Australian jew news mogul, Rupert Murdoch, let his two 40-something libtard sons take over Fox News' day to day operations. Since that time, most whiteys have been purged (good Bolshevik term) from Fox News. The old white guys were let go and when you turn on Fox News today, it is floor to ceiling filled with colored minorities, both male and female, jews, and libtards of all stripes. They still keep their blond bimbos and the constant flow of 20-something pretty young female attorneys (gotta have the eye-candy) dressed in their sleeveless mini-dresses with plunging fronts and 'informing' old retired white guys like me about war, terrorism, history, politics, etc. Regards Payne, he could have ax-murdered someone on video, and Fox will cover for the guy because of muh diversity.
Moderator, please do not stifle my comment just because I am an evil Red-Pilled whitey male who is 'woke' regards jews and vibrant diversity.
I'm not going to stifle you, "Truth-hammer," but I am going to correct you.
Rupert is not, and has never been a Jew.
You also mistakenly use single quotes, when double quotation marks are correct.
I would think that such a "woke" fellow would not succumb to the punctuation practices of the "jew" media.
I'm embarrassed for you, man. You need to change your handle.
Then again, you're just another of my ZOG puppets.
Post a Comment