Friday, May 17, 2013

Still No Verdict in George Thomas Re-Trial


War crime victims Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom

A Knox County mug shot of war crime defendant George Thomas

[Previously, by this writer:

"The Knoxville Horror: The Crime and the Cover-Up";

"This Case is About What George Thomas Did Not Do": Playing the Race Card, and Double Misrepresentation: Day One of George Thomas' Knoxville Horror Re-Trial"; and

"Big-Butt White Women, the Mysterious Moving Gun, and the Non-Sleeping Jurors: Day 2 of the George Thomas Knoxville Horror Re-Trial."]

By Nicholas Stix

After each side completed its closing argument and rebuttal, Judge Walter Kurtz spent over an hour reading his instructions ti the jury, with detailed separate instructions for each of the 46 counts. The jury then went to deliberate.

Your trusty correspondent kept vigil at the courthouse, along with the families and friends of victims Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom. Most of the other reporters had left before noon, when Judge Kurtz began reading his instructions to the jury, and only returned around dinner time.

There was an easy camaraderie between some of the reporters who had covered the story for years, and who would drop in on the families, who were trying to keep things as light as they could. As the new kid on the block, this writer kept a modest distance, on a set of cushion-seats about eight feet away.

At one point, Mr. Newsom dropped in on me, gave me a lengthy interview about Christopher, and even shared his strawberry shortcake with me. Later, some of his family, who had brought chicken tenders and sauce, also shared their food with me, and even asked about where I was from. Very kind people of all ages. Devout Christians.

At 5:52 p.m., several court officers delivered approximately 18 pizzas to the jury.

At 8 p.m., court officers sent us home for the night, as the jury was heading to their hotel for the night. Actually, a veteran local reporter, whose name I don't know, acted as a conduit. She said they said that we needn't come back until 10 a.m. tomorrow.


Mike said...

We live in a country where judges are so immune to scrutiny that it can be common knowledge in their circles that they are insane drug addicts, and yet that fact never reaches the awareness of the common man.

And at the same time, we live in a country where savages like George Thomas roam free looking for victims even though it is obvious he should be caged for the rest of his life.

I wonder if at some level, the two are connected.

Anonymous said...

There will never be a true verdict. To have a true verdict this loathsome monster would have been swinging at the end of a rope years ago.

PDK / Kelto-Scandic Secessionist said...

I was thinking about how much more the Negro sub-species is born of an r selective gene pool than the white sub-species. I was sorting it out, puzzling it through and trying to fathom the great depths of some of the different impacts that quantity of numbers at the expense of quality of IQ and vice versa, would have on the organisms produced by these mutually exclusive gene pools. One venue where it surely would express itself is in the realm of sexuality.

Most Americans would, by young adulthood, have noticed that black females have, on average, the largest and fattest posteriors. Further most American adults by some point in time have come to understand that black males typically are much more sexually excited by a larger, well fatten, female rump than are white males.

Simple thinking on our human evolution, from our humanity’s time as subsistence living people, from scavenger-gatherers, to hunter-gathers, would have had pronounced differences in amount of subsistence material availing at any given time, times of plenty, times of paucity, times in-between. These variations would have had an impact on our reproduction.

Moreover, it needs be understood that impregnation of the female is only half the story, giving birth is the other half, much like the difference between just hooking a fish and both hooking and landing a fish, one without the other is useless, pointless.

When our ancient ancestors were totally dependent upon subsistence living, a very particular gene in the male, once materialized, would have been naturally favored and therefore selected out, a gene that triggers sexual excitation for the female when the ripened or mature female has fattened because of times of plenty. Fattened females then impregnated would have the extra calories needed for pregnancy in lean times, furthering the numbers of offspring left behind, thereby and in turn, furthering the numbers of males with the gene.

In the 80s, from the world of health and dieticians, came the expression; “men are apples and women are pears”. This refers to the particular body area for stashing extra calories, the male in the gut, the female in the rump. I suspect this is a natural occurrence because of, or born out, male/female hormones, and undoubtedly has an evolutionary story, but that is not important here. Here it is only important to recognize that females stash their extra calories in the rump.

In regards to the gene pool strategies, where on one side quantity is favored over quality, the opposing side favors quality over quantity. This is important here because in our mutually exclusive evolutions those whose gene pool favored quality over quantity who further, had sufficient IQ were more capable of sustaining the impregnated female through lean times and therefore this gene pool people, would not be as dependent on a pre-impregnated, fatten female. Therefore, the male gene for stimulation of sexual excitation upon the stimulus of a fattened female would not be constantly reinforced and would slowly lessen in the gene pool.

However, those born of the gene pool favoring quantity over quality would not have had sufficient IQ to sustain unfattened, pregnant females through times of sustenance paucity. Therefore the pre-impregnated, fatten females would be more successful in reproducing, constantly reinforcing their gene pool’s “male excitation for the fattened female” gene. (end part 1)

PDK / Kelto-Scandic Secessionist said...

(begin part 2)

We are all the evolutionary effects of multiple causes. However, here this single untangled strand of cause and effect reasoning, would without doubt, reflect itself when measured by correlation, and further, the correlation between physically smaller, lower IQed cerebrum people, and the level of male sexual excitation for larger, well fattened female rumps, would be positive. The gene pool that produces the lowest IQ, will produce the highest level of male sexual attraction for “fattened in the rump” females.

To some extent, smaller brain, larger rump. Therefore, if you are a “plump in the rump” white female, it is more dangerous for you to walk through blackieville.

This post dispatched from the “Sanctuary of the Herald/Crier Project” for white secession and a future harmonious life in happiness. Thank you.