Wednesday, May 12, 2010

The Knoxville Horror: Why Racist Carjacker-Kidnapper-Rapist-Torturer-Murderer Letalvis Cobbins was Spared the Death Penalty

By Nicholas Stix

“When asked if she could have signed the death warrant if Cobbins had been the ringleader in the crimes, the juror said, ‘I don't want to comment on that.’"

An anonymous black juror from the Letalvis Cobbins/Knoxville Horror trial to reporter Hana Kim, on her decision not to impose the death penalty on Cobbins, WATE, May 3, 2010.

With the Vanessa Coleman/Knoxville Horror trial now going to the jury, there has been news regarding the trial of Letalvis Cobbins from last August.

Since the case in question has been under embargo by the national MSM, a little background is in order. (The MSM has occasionally lifted its embargo, in order to denounce its critics, including me, as “white supremacists,” and to plagiarize my work on the case.)

In the case which I have dubbed the Knoxville Horror, on January 6-7, 2007, between five and seven blacks carjacked, kidnapped, beat, tortured, gang-raped and murdered a white couple, University of Tennessee student Channon Christian, 21, and her boyfriend, Christopher Newsom, 23. (Yes, they raped Newsom, as well.) The crimes were all committed within the City of Knoxville, Tennessee. So far, four people have been charged with murder, and one with being an accessory after the fact. Although at least seven people, black and white alike, have confessed under oath to having also been accessories after the fact, only one has so far been charged.

So far, four participants in the crime have been tried and convicted:

Eric Boyd was convicted as an accessory after the fact in April, 2008, and six months later was sentenced to 18 years in prison;

Lemaricus Davidson was convicted and sentenced to death last October;

Letalvis Cobbins was convicted last August, and sentenced to life without parole, and later to “life, plus 100 years”; and

George Thomas was convicted last December, and given “two sentences of life in prison without parole.” Is that supposed to mean that he is to die in prison, be brought back from the dead, and then begin serving another sentence until he dies? No, the seeming redundancy was a compromise. On the one hand, it was because one or more black jurors refused to mete out justice to one of their own, no matter how heinous the crime; on the other, it was because jurors could not trust criminal justice authorities to keep Cobbins in jail for life.

My reader-researcher David in Tennessee sent along the link to this interview with a black female Nashville juror from the Letalvis Cobbins trial. Last August, Cobbins was sentenced to “life without parole,” which in practice usually means, “life until parole or pardon.”

In February, Judge Richard Baumgartner extended Cobbins’ “life” sentence to “life, plus 100 years.” Does that mean that his corpse will be stinking up a prison section for 100 years? No; it’s mere rhetoric, meant to confuse the public from a judge who has revealed himself to be an ardent opponent of the death penalty, at least, where black killers are concerned.

Some people will say, “So what’s the big deal? Jurors get to vote their consciences.”

No, they don’t. When each potential juror is put through voir dire in the jury selection process of a capital murder trial (i.e., a trial in which the death penalty is on the table), he must testify under oath on his position regarding the death penalty. If he says that he is opposed to it, he must be automatically excused from jury duty, because his presence on the jury would sabotage any possibility of the defendant being sentenced to death. In order to be eligible to serve on a jury in a capital murder case, a juror must declare himself willing, under certain circumstances, to vote for the death penalty. Typically, those circumstances entail aggravating factors being present—e.g., murder in the course of committing a separate felony, such as robbery, rape, or kidnapping; the defendant having murdered more than one person; the murder having been carried out in an especially heinous manner, such as being accompanied by torture; or the defendant having murdered a peace officer, or court or penal institution employee—and the aggravating factors outweighing any mitigating factors.

The problem is that with ever greater frequency, black jurors go into capital murder trials of black defendants fully intending to sabotage them, either to protect the defendant from execution, or to engage in full-blown jury nullification, and set a murderer free. To that end, blacks routinely perjure themselves during voir dire, regarding their attitude towards the death penalty.

Anyone who follows capital murder prosecutions of black defendants—and the majority of murders in America are committed by blacks, even though they presently make up only 12.1 percent of the population—knows that the only way to preserve the possibility of a heinous killer getting his proper deserts is for the jury composition to be as free of blacks as possible. Conversely, if you are a defense attorney seeking to ensure that your murderous black client not be executed, you try and get as many black jurors seated as possible.

Thus, when Judge Richard Baumgartner ruled that he was going to have jury selection in Davidson County, which has three times as many blacks as in Knox County, where the crimes were committed, I knew that he was seeking to rig the possible sentence, in the case of a guilty verdict, against the death penalty, and I said as much.

Unfortunately, the jury did not disprove my prediction.

[From the juror’s WATE interview:] "A lot of religion kicked in, the Bible, everybody was very emotional. I mean that's somebody's life," she said….
But she said most jurors, including herself, needed little convincing that Cobbins was guilty. "We were trying to see, you know, figure out his part in it, but other than that I guess we were pretty much all together."

Despite Cobbins' attempt on the witness stand to persuade jurors that he was only guilty of raping Channon Christian, the juror said it was his lack of action that ultimately made him criminally responsible for murder.

"I guess by association. I mean that's really it. He had a chance to walk away and he chose not to."

The woman said the trial is an experience she'd like to wipe from her memory, especially the graphic autopsy pictures.

"Just some stuff I've never seen before and I can't believe I am sitting here watching. It was really shocking. It was like something you see in a movie."

She said she's mostly saddened for the victims' families. "It was exhausting and emotionally heartbreaking."

When asked if she could have signed the death warrant if Cobbins had been the ringleader in the crimes, the juror said, "I don't want to comment on that."

It would have been easy for her to lie, and say that she voted against the death penalty, because Cobbins wasn’t the ringleader, but she wouldn’t even say that! Given the gruesomeness of Cobbins’ crimes, and the lack of any comparable mitigating factors, the juror who spoke to WATE had been unwilling to sentence Cobbins to death under any circumstances. That means that she perjured herself, in order to save a black murderer who had committed whatU.S. Attorney James R. Dedrick had called, without hyperbole, “one of, if not the most, horrendous crimes ever committed in Knoxville, Tennessee.”

As Channon Christian’s father Gary asked, following Cobbins’ sentencing, “What do you have to do today to get the death penalty”?

Thus, the same racial crisis that afflicts other American institutions afflicts the criminal justice system.

1 comment:

Happy walker said...

nice blog.. have a view of my blog when free.. .. do leave me some comment / guide if can.. if interested can follow my blog...