Watch the daily wire and some corporate ai pee on our pants, and tell us it’s raining, regarding anti-White, corporate job discrimination

daily wire table 2023 9-30 "bloomberg-numbers"

Watch the daily wire and some corporate ai pee on our pants, and tell us it’s raining, regarding anti-White, corporate job discrimination

By JohnnyWalker123
June 9, 2025

https://twitter.com/robkhenderson/status/1931819795860623487

Ask Perplexity (corporate ai bot)

@AskPerplexity

“there’s a lot of confusion around the claim that ‘only 6% of new jobs at s&p 100 companies in 2021 went to whites,’ so let’s break it down with what the data actually shows.

“the original Bloomberg report did say that of the net increase in jobs—meaning the difference between people hired and people who left—94% went to people of color and only 6% to white workers, but this is *not* the same as saying only 6% of all new hires were white. the ‘6%’ figure refers to net change, not the total number of hires, and doesn’t account for the many white employees who left or retired and were replaced by other white workers or people of color.

“when you look at the full hiring picture, including both people coming and going, estimates suggest that about 46% of all new jobs actually went to white workers, which is somewhat below their share of the workforce but nowhere near as dramatic as the viral claim. the focus on net change exaggerates the shift and doesn’t reflect the actual hiring breakdown, so the original tweet misinterprets the data, and the correction from @CoreyWriting is accurate—this statistic has been widely misunderstood and misused.

“in summary: the ‘6%’ number is misleading, and the real share of new hires going to white workers in 2021 was much higher—closer to their proportion in the workforce, though somewhat lower than in previous years as companies made efforts to diversify.

“based on the available data for S&P 100 companies in 2021, of the jobs not filled by white workers (about 54% of the total), the breakdown was approximately: 40% hispanic, 23% black, 22% asian, and roughly 8% from other non-white groups.

“this reflects a significant push to diversify hiring, especially in entry-level and lower-paying roles, but the numbers also show that hispanic workers saw the largest gains among people of color, followed by black and asian workers."


By Nicholas Stix

https://www.dailywire.com/news/bloomberg-flubs-data-for-bombshell-report-that-only-6-of-new-corporate-hires-are-white

The ai bot you re-posted and the daily wire both assert that Bloomberg was all wrong, but I don’t understand their sophistry. They need to get their lies straight.

(Note that ai is a gigo–garbage in, garbage out–proposition. It is typically rigged by pc programmers. Have you tried to make sense of the ai at google?)

Second, corporations have for generations engaged in massive over-hiring of incompetent and unfit black and hispanic affirmative action workers. (The table at the daily wire says that corporate employees in 2020 were 16.47% black, and that hispanics were 16.59%.)

Thirdly, your bot and the daily wire mook, Luke Rosiak, both assume that all things are equal, such that if the percentage of hispanics rises 4%, then corporate American should be hiring 4% more hispanics. But all things are not equal. If non-hispanic Whites are 58.4% of the populace (according to the census bureau), the percentage of high-iq Whites is way higher than that (65-70%), while the percentage of high-iq blacks and hispanics is way below their percentage of the population.

The daily wire positively cites Robert Verbruggen, regarding the fakestats it is pushing. Robert & I used to run into each other at immigration policy conferences, and he was always polite to me, but he has become a dubious source for journalism for several years now.

“A Daily Wire analysis of the same numbers examined by Bloomberg found that, in reality, the demographics of hiring figures for 2021 were barely different from previous years. The percentage of new jobs that went to whites was likely about 46%, eight points below the 54% white makeup of companies’ existing workforces. That’s to be expected given demographic changes in the United States since the time that the currently-retiring baby boomer generation first entered the workforce.”

“The country’s demographics are changing — older generations are much whiter than younger ones,” VerBruggen told The Daily Wire. “If whites are disproportionately retiring and non-whites are disproportionately getting jobs, that will skew the numbers, giving the appearance of a serious commitment to equity — or mass violations of civil-rights law, depending on one’s perspective.”

This sounds like a democrat talking. There’s no “or” involved. “A serious commitment to equity” is just a euphemistic way of saying, “mass violations of civil-rights law.”

I don’t see that “46%” number for new White hires in the daily wire’s numbers. I see an increase of 20,524 White workers from 2020 to 2021. That’s 0.4%.

For the same period, I see an increase of 130,937 hispanic workers. That’s 8.7%.

For the same period, I see an increase of 74,470 black workers. That’s 5.0%.

For the same period, I see an increase of 25,016 “other” (also non-White, and surely affirmative action) workers. That’s 6.67%.

The table says that, based on its 2020 demographics, corporations should have hired 172,606 new Whites, but came up 152,082 short. With every other group, corporations hired 21,000-77,000 new workers BEYOND what one would expect, based on demographics.

At the bottom of its table, the daily wire asserts that 45.54% of new hires in 2021 were White, but Luke Rosiak just pulled that number out of his butt, or it’s a deus ex machina, depending on one’s perspective. There is no basis whatsoever for it in the table. But what the table does tell us is that corporate America has been engaging in egregious racial discrimination against Whites for many years, keeps getting worse, and that the daily wire supports said discrimination.

I guess the mooks at the daily wire didn’t expect people to read their table.


(N.S.) “But what the table does tell us is that corporate America has been engaging in egregious, racial discrimination against Whites for many years, keeps getting worse, and that the daily wire supports said discrimination.”

Oilcan Floyd: “You don’t need data to know that. If you’ve had at least one regular job, you know what’s going on. If you’ve worked for more than one company, it starts to become obvious. The more jobs you’ve had, the more obvious the trend becomes.

“Some things are just so obvious by sight, and because the people in charge are literally telling you what they are doing, that you don’t need data? Does anyone remember when Bill Clinton stood in front of a bunch of white college students and told them that they will be a minority and that the country no longer belongs to them? Is the argument over whether or not the elites have achieved their goal yet?

“I haven’t paid much attention to the hispanic riots, so I don’t know exactly what’s going on, but do you really need to play with crime stats to know that hispanics don’t fit and are not a net benefit? Even in my small town 3,000 miles away, some local hispanic activists were standing around with signs denouncing ICE. The general disrespect for the laws and culture tells me all I need to know. Again, data and academic argument aren’t needed, especially when the data and argumentation destroy the reputation of data and academic argumentation.

“My comment isn’t a dig at you. I just read your post and decided to reply.”

N.S.: Of course, you’re absolutely right. So, why did I bother fisking the article, the table, and the ai? Sometimes I look straight past the obvious, and get lost in fake details.