Media attempts to psychoanalyze iran, in order to foretell the future

By Grand Rapids Anonymous
sunday, june 22, 2025 at 2:08:00 p.m. edt

Media attempts to psychoanalyze iran, in order to foretell the future

GRA: In scanning the tv nutworks and their “reporting,” along with perusing various on-line media musings, I’ve come to the conclusion that people in the news (noise) industry aren’t satisfied with “just” reporting the facts anymore. They want to be in that nebulous profession of tarot card reader, crystal ball interpreter, and football game prognosticator.

Last night, on abc noise, I saw one “expert”—who acted as though he had inside info—that he KNEW what the ayatollah and iranian pols were thinking.

“they want to keep their positions—the regime intact,” he stated without a doubt. Then he took that factless statement further, by throwing in some amateur psychoanalysis.

“iran will not fight back, will not go after our military bases, in order to prevent a regime change,” which seemed to sate the anchor (David Muir’s understudy, Whit Johnson).

Other opinions included the definition of the word, “war”—based on political party. Is what President Trump initiated yesterday “war”? President Trump says, “no, not against iran, just their nuclear program.”

Tim Kaine asked, “Does iran think it’s war? Would we think it's war if iran bombed a U.S. nuclear facility?”

Of course, party line will dictate which definition you attach yourself to on tv.

It’s war all right—an opening salvo—one that P.T. hopes is one and done, but it is war. The media looks at the bombings as a way to turn voters against Trump.

As Margaret Brennan suggested, “we are slowly moving to more and more war in iran. when do we decide ‘enough is enough’?”

A general Frank McKenzie, attempted to disperse Madame Brennan’s predictions on face (the commie) nation this morning, based on U.S. intelligence:

“the ayatollah is still alive, I’m sure he’s having a difficult time having decisions carried out...as many of his senior personnel are dead.”

“I’m sure.” More supposition from someone sent to go on cbs to calm everyone down.

“‘there are fears,’ said Brennan, which is a favorite word of msm seers—FEAR. Fear of drones attacking military bases across the ocean, fear of drones in the U.S., fear of iran setting mines in the strait of hormuz. None of it is news. If they want to editorialize or prognosticate, put a show together called, cbs opinions, and let them have at it.

But as news breaks, try sticking with what facts you know, instead of inciting fear with half-a**ed assumptions, predictions, and unverifiable scenarios.

--GRA