Thursday, May 15, 2025

"grounded by truth"


"grounded by truth"

Click here To View Online

America's Future
We The People

Make no mistake that the latest hoax perpetrated by the lunatic left and their media partners to obstruct the will of the people and destroy the fabric of America is none other than a suspected member of the murder gang MS-13, and that's not all.

 

Meet "Maryland Man" — 29-year-old Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an illegal alien, suspected member of the Central American drug and murder gang MS-13, and alleged wife-beater. Garcia has the starring role in the scheme targeted to impede President Trump's core campaign promise to run the largest deportation operation in U.S. history and remove every illegal alien the Joe Biden administration ushered across our border.

The Democrats believe they can stall Trump's initiative if they can portray the violent illegal as a normal American father and husband or, as the press describes him innocuously, a "Maryland man" — and one caught in Trump's unfair dragnet.

 

Garcia was deported back to his native El Salvador in March, and as if on cue, fire-breathing progressive U.S. Senator from Maryland Chris Van Hollen visited him in a Salvadoran prison where Gracia told the U.S. lawmaker he'd been "traumatized." Van Hollen sees Garcia — uh, Maryland Man — as a litmus test for all Americans. "If we deny the constitutional rights of this one man, it threatens the constitutional rights of everybody in America." That is, the illegal alien is entitled to due process.

 

It's total nonsense and betrayal of the Constitution and every American citizen entitled to due process under the law.

 

Where was Van Hollen on due process when J6 protesters spent years in dirty jails without trials, or other American citizens he and other Democrats are politically opposed to?

 

For instance, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries called for Kyle Rittenhouse to be thrown in jail as his trial was still underway. Sen. Chuck Schumer said about the January 6th protesters, "No leniency. No leniency for these people. They have the cameras all over. They have their pictures. No matter what part of the country they came from, we ought to go after them right now."

 

The Democrats felt the same way about Trump himself. "He needs to be imprisoned & placed in solitary confinement," Democrat Rep. Maxine Waters said in October 2019. "But for now, impeachment is the imperative." Then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi agreed. "I don't want to see him impeached," she said of Trump in December 2019. "I want to see him in prison."

 

In fact, the Democrats admit they're only talking about due process because they don't want to look soft on illegal aliens. "We have to be careful to not get sucked into an argument where Republicans can say we care more about undocumented immigrants than American citizens … so that's why [Democrats] keep talking about due process," a Democratic strategist told the media. "We need to focus on how there needs to be a process to make sure that innocent people and citizens don't get caught up in this, and that's how we need to be talking about this." It's a hoax – full throttle. Americans will not be fooled. The truth is on our side!

 

Please participate in our Reader's Survey. Your insights and thoughts are important as we learn what is on the minds and in the hearts of our fellow Americans. We read them all and share some of them Mondays at 9 a.m. during America's Future live broadcasts with our Executive Director Mary O'Neill on America's Mondays With Mary. Thank You.

Divider
Speaking with American Patriots - Lafayette Lee

"Lafayette Lee" is the pseudonym of a family man, proud American who calls the West and South his home, and U.S. Army veteran of the Global War on Terror whose essays and articles about America, manhood, and the debt owed family and country can be found at Ruins of Corotoman. We spoke with Lee recently about what makes America and Americans great.

 

Why do you use Clark Gable's photo as your social media avatar – or more precisely, what aspects of Americanness and masculinity does he represent that you admire?

 

I spent my formative years with grandparents, and so my tastes and interests have always been slightly out of step with the rest of my generation. Along with the King James Bible and old family yarns, Golden Age Hollywood forged my moral universe with figures like John Wayne, Jimmy Stewart, Gary Cooper, and Clark Gable personifying idealized masculine virtue. Clark Gable was always a favorite, as he could perfectly balance strength and grit with a devilish charm that made his characters unusually interesting and complex. Of course, Gable's performance as Rhett Butler is the best example of this, and without that balance, the film would have fallen short of being a true tragedy.

 

In some ways, we are all stars of our own tragedy. Life is short and fragile, and no matter how hard we fight for what we love, we are bound to lose it in the end. Strength and grit are admirable, but to smile in the face of doom is something more.

 

Is the new Defense Secretary, Pete Hegseth, restoring the American public's faith that the Pentagon is designed to protect the country and not advance the social justice agenda?

 

Hegseth is a soldier's soldier, and I have complete confidence in him. He inherited a uniquely dangerous recruitment and retention crisis, which, if left unresolved, will permanently cripple U.S. foreign policy. Like other institutions, the military is grappling with a cultural crisis years in the making, and Monopoly money, technology, and political gimmicks are simply not enough; it all starts with the military's backbone—the ordinary men and women ready to close with and destroy our enemies. We need to return to the fundamentals, prioritize lethality, impose higher standards, reform and discipline the officer corps, and cultivate an ethos based on duty and national pride. As a soldier, Hegseth knows that the military is nothing without its backbone, and unless it's restored after years of neglect, the entire enterprise is doomed.

 

What's happening to the public lands in the western mountain region that has you and some other people concerned?

 

The Intermountain West is the crown jewel of North America and home to just roughly 12% of the population. Over the past decade, the region has seen a massive influx of money and human capital, which now threatens to forever alter the culture and demographics of the West and destroy a precious way of life. There has always been a tension between Federal and State control of the West, with questions of sovereignty first and foremost. And yet, amid these tensions, Westerners have been able to enjoy a unique relationship with the land not found anywhere else. Hunting, fishing, and grazing in the Intermountain West are based on a series of arrangements brokered over a century that allow everyday citizens to live a kind of Jeffersonian existence, while being able to access the riches of the region, impart their traditions, and live almost as free as their ancestors who settled the land did. But all that is at risk now, largely thanks to state and local politicians who stand to make a fortune from developers. These politicians know if they beat the "sovereignty" drum long enough, appealing to Westerners' sense of independence, they will have the political support to gain control over vast tracts of land, including pristine wilderness, which they will immediately transfer to donors, developers, and multinational corporations.

 

If we lose this fight, not only will the Intermountain West look more like California, we will watch a precious way of life—which is fundamental to our self-conception as Americans—wither away and die.

 

You've written before about how Americans who deeply love this country have had to wander in the wilderness, like Moses, before we and the land can be restored. Are we still in the wilderness?

 

I believe we are still wandering through the wilderness, but the promised land feels more real today than it has in years. The information regime of the past six years—if not the past six decades—is no more. Everything is different now.

 

This is a season of second chances, a time for exploration, growth, preparation, and strategy. Those of us who still carry the fire must be willing to share our vision of the future for those still wandering in darkness.

 

What is your prayer for America?

 

My prayer for America is for the political to return to earth, to become real again, and for Americans to finally sober up from all the -isms and empty moralizing, and to see their interests as they truly are: simple, crude, and even indecent; and for once, stand for themselves and no one else.

Editor's Note: To read other Speaking With American Patriots interviews, please click here.

Defenders Of Freedom

America's Future Files Brief Supporting Constitutional Checks & Balances 

Supreme Court Columns

On Tuesday, April 15, 2025, America's Future filed an Amicus brief with the Supreme Court of the Untied States (SCOTUS) in Donald Trump, President of the United States v Gwynne Wilcox (24A966), a case consolidated with Scott Bessent, Secretary of the Treasury v Cathy Harris.  The brief was filed in defense of the constitutional principles envisioned by the Framers and, specifically in support of President Trump's Application to Stay the Wilcox judgment issued by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia last month ordering President Trump to reinstate Ms. Wilcox to her former position on the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) after he had fired her.  The district court effectively attempts to unwind his decision and commandeer his authority as chief of the executive branch. Notably, America's Future filed an earlier brief with the Circuit Court of Appeals which is located here. The SCOTUS docket in this case is located here.

 

Once again, powers constitutionally conferred to the President under Article II are stymied, held hostage by a faction of local judges who should know better than to usurp the powers of one of the two other co-equal branches of government.

 

As background, on January 27, 2025, President Trump terminated Gwynne Wilcox from her position at the NLRB, and did so without asserting any basis as noted by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) which states that board members can be terminated only with a showing of "neglect of duty or malfeasance in office, but for no other cause."  The President rejects the NLRA requirements, arguing that they impose unconstitutional restraint on his Article II powers to remove principal officers who exercise executive powers.  We agree and, to that end, the brief explains, 

President Trump has exercised the power of the Presidency to remove at-will any principal officer of the United States exercising executive power. That act of the President may violate the terms of a statute, but it is well supported, particularly by Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926). There, this Court ruled that Congress could not condition the removal of a principal officer exercising executive power on the advice and consent of the Senate. The general principle that should be drawn from that case is that Congress may place no conditions on the President's power to remove principal officers who exercise executive power, including as with the NLRA.

The issues presented by this case are critical questions involving the separation of powers doctrine.  In fact, the Application filed by the government seek determination as to whether the legislative branch can statutorily limit the executive's inherent powers. Notably, the Court of Appeals dissent authored by Judge Rao brings to light the answers, stating,

As to the constitutional question…the President's removal of Harris and Wilcox falls within his Article II authority. The Constitution vests all executive power in a single President. The President has both the power and the responsibility to supervise and direct Executive Branch officers (requiring the President to 'take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed'). To carry out this responsibility, the President must be able to remove officers at will. 'Since 1789, the Constitution has been understood to empower the President to keep … officers accountable—by removing them from office, if necessary'… While statutes provide for-cause removal protections for Harris and Wilcox, these restrictions are likely unconstitutional because they interfere with the President's authority to remove principal officers who execute the law.

Our brief provides the court with additional insight as to the constitutional role of the President, stating,

The President of the United States is the only official in America who is elected by the participation of all the People…Thus, whether pundits characterize the magnitude of his election as sufficient to be termed a "mandate," the President has the authority and obligation to advance the platform on which he ran. [] The basic power a President would need to possess is the ability to recruit and place persons in his Administration who share his vision and who could assist him in carrying out his responsibilities. This personnel power would necessarily include both appointing and removing subordinate officials.

At the core, this case demonstrates a need for the SCOTUS to intervene and exercise its own powers under Article III to prevent the lower courts from continuing their encroachment upon the executive branch. It should also issue a writ of certiorari instructing that the President, as chief of the executive branch has the inherent authority to manage the agencies comprising it.

Editor's Note: To read more details about this filing, along with other briefs filed by America's Future, please visit our Law & Policy page.

Defenders Of Freedom

Precious Lives Need Your Voice

Get In The Fight

There is no greater crisis in America than the exploitation and trafficking of children. The suffering of a child is intolerable, and every individual has a responsibility to step up and speak out to end the tragedy.

 

"Our nation must build an army of educated and active citizens willing to mobilize to expose the evil of child trafficking and end this crisis once and for all," said Mary Flynn O'Neill, executive director of America's Future. "There are no exceptions and no excuses. Every child deserves to be safe and loved. These precious lives need our voices. Together we can do this, and America's Future is on the frontline, leading the way with our Get In The Fight initiative."

 

O'Neill is referring to America's Future Get In The Fight summits and training programs that have been held in a multitude of states over the last year. The team of expert instructors and leaders in this fight has crisscrossed the country, training thousands from Florida to Washington State.  Tomorrow and Saturday, April 25 and 26, the team will be in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, at the Oasis Church, 3445 Gateway Drive. Registration is ongoing for Wisconsin residents and others interested in learning how they can help end child exploitation and trafficking. Click here to learn more and register for Get In The Fight Wisconsin.

 

On April 25th, the Wisconsin campaign will begin at 6 p.m. (CST) with remarks by General Mike Flynn, America's Future Board Chair. This will be followed by a panel discussion moderated by Lara Logan, an award-winning investigative journalist on the Board of America's Future. Summit panelists include Tara Lee Rodas, HHS whistleblower; Lynz Piper-Loomis, podcaster, overcomer, & Author of I Am Silent No More; Jarrod Sadulski, Ph.D., Criminal Justice; Michelle Peterson, Andrew's Law Advocate, and a representative from Shepherd's Watch.

 

The following day, Saturday, April 26th, a full day of training will run from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and offer diverse courses and curriculum covering topics such as "Navigating the Emerging Threat of Sextortion" with Dr. Sadulski, "Overcomer Seminar – Training With Purpose," with Ms. Piper-Loomis, and "Understanding the Constitution: Protecting Liberty and Strengthening the Republic," taught by constitutional attorney, LTC Ivan Raiklin, USA (Ret.), and America's Future Board Director.

 

Rounding out the day of training is a special showing of the movie Into The Light, followed by a discussion on the manipulation of messaging by the entertainment and media industries and the perils of artificial intelligence (AI) and technology, with particular emphasis on the vulnerability of children and their engagement with social media. The two-day program will end with an open forum with many of the event's panelists and instructors.

 

The Wisconsin Get In The Fight campaign is part of America's Future Project Defend & Protect Our Children (PDPC), established to build a nationwide grassroots network of informed citizens armed with the facts, knowledge, and tools to help end the war on children in America. For details and to register for the Get In The Fight Wisconsin summit and training program, please click here.

Future Get In The Fight summits and training are planned for June 7th in Sewickley, Pennsylvania, at Christ Church at Grove Farm on 249 Duff Road, and on August 22nd and 23rd, trainers and instructors will be in El Cajon, California. Registration for the Pennsylvania event is now open. To learn more and register for the Pennsylvania event, click here. To stay informed about other news and information, upcoming events, and receive the PDPC Bulletin, join the PDPC network here.

Divider
IN FOCUS - Tools Of Tyrants

The CIA and the JFK Assassination — Part Five

This is the seventieth entry in our In Focus series identifying and exposing the tools that modern-day tyrants are using to thwart the will of We The People for power and control. To access previous articles, please click here.

 

Few doubt that the CIA had the motive to remove President Kennedy from office, and it has been demonstrated there were three plans in effect — three opportunities — to assassinate him in November 1963.  With those elements established, the investigatory focus turns to whether the CIA had the means to conduct an assassination of a leading government official.

 

The Church Committee Interim Report on Assassinations

 

In 1975, the Church Committee — officially the "U.S. Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities" — paid special attention to assassinations.  The Committee issued a lengthy "Interim Report: Alleged Assassination Plots Involving Foreign Leaders," which concluded, using what could be termed "diplomatic" language: 

The evidence establishes that the United States was implicated in several assassination plots.  The Committee believes that, short of war, assassination is incompatible with American principles, international order, and morality.  It should be rejected as a tool of foreign policy.  [Emphasis added.]

Executive Orders

 

The work of the Church Committee led to the issuance of Executive Order 11905 (Feb. 18, 1976) by President Gerald Ford to ban political assassination, providing: "No employee of the United States Government shall engage in, or conspire to engage in, political assassination."  President Carter issued Executive Order 12036 (Jan. 24, 1978) to extend the ban on all assassinations, whether or not political.  President Reagan's Executive Order 12333 (Dec. 4, 1981), which repeated the language in Carter's EO, states: "No person employed by or acting on behalf of the United States Government shall engage in, or conspire to engage in, assassination."

 

Indeed, upon review, "the evidence" collected by the Church Committee, and which led to these three Executive Orders, establishes a great deal more than "several assassination plots."

 

The 1953 CIA Assassination Manual

 

Only a few years after the CIA's founding, in 1953, it produced a 20-page manual entitled "A Study of Assassination."  This document was created in the context of a plan to overthrow the leftist government of Guatemala and was declassified in 1997.  The manual asserts:  

Killing a political leader whose burgeoning career is a clear and present danger to the cause of freedom may be held necessary.  [Emphasis added.]

Remarkable!

 

The manual offered suggestions for "contrived accident[s]."  "The most efficient accident ... is a fall of 75 feet or more onto a hard surface.  Elevator shafts, stairwells, unscreened windows and bridges will serve."  The manual proposed "grabbing the victim by the ankles and 'tipping the subject over the edge....  Falls before trains or subway cars are usually effective, but require exact timing.'"

 

The memo lists as examples assassinations or assassination attempts of Lincoln, Harding, Roosevelt, Truman, as well as others such as the Archduke Francis Ferdinand and Hitler.

 

Killing Hope by William Blum

 

A journalist who focused years of investigation into the CIA, William Blum, wrote a detailed and heavily footnoted book, Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II.  There, Blum sought to catalogue U.S. assassinations and assassination attempts overseas, primarily conducted by the CIA.  (Surprisingly, Blum's entire book is reproduced on the CIA's website.)

 

This list is both exhaustive and astonishing, including Korean opposition leader Kim Ku in 1949, President of Indonesia Sukarno, Premier of North Korea Kim Il Sung, Iranian Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh, Philippine opposition leader Claro M. Recto, Jawaharlal Nehru, Gamal Abdul Nasser, Norodom Sihanouk, Jose Figueres, Francois 'Papa Doc' Duvalier, Gen. Rafael Trujillo, Charles de Gaulle, Salvador Allende, Michael Manley, Ayatollah Khomeini, the nine comandantes of the Sandinista National Directorate, Mohamed Farah Aideed, prominent clan leader of Somalia, and Slobodan Milosevic.

 

President Lyndon B. Johnson told the Atlantic in 1973 that "when he had taken office he found that 'we had been operating a damned Murder Inc. in the Caribbean.'"

 

Premier of China Zhou Enlai — 1955

 

One of the CIA's earlier assassination attempts was directed against Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai by exploding a bomb on the chartered Air India plane Kashmir Princess Enlai was to fly in to an international conference in India: 

The plane took off on the night of April 11, 1955 ... but without Zhou Enlai and his senior colleagues.  China had gotten wind of the CIA plot [and] assigned lower-level Chinese cadre officials [to the flight] as well as a set of journalists, as their presence would result in wider press coverage.

Prime Minister of Iraq Abd al-Karim Qasim — 1959-1963

 

Another early CIA assassination effort was against Prime Minister Abd al-Karim Qasim of Iraq:  Particularly interesting was the person who worked with the CIA on this assassination attempt:

The first such attempt, on October 7, 1959, was botched badly, and one of the assassins, Saddam Hussein, was spirited out to an agency apartment in Cairo.  There was a second Agency effort in 1960-61 with a poisoned handkerchief.  [Emphasis added.]

Another article investigating Saddam and the CIA's involvement in this first attempt found:

According to another former senior State Department official, Saddam, while only in his early 20s, became a part of a U.S. plot to get rid of Qasim....  One former CIA official said that the 22-year-old Saddam lost his nerve and began firing too soon, killing Qasim's driver and only wounding Qasim in the shoulder and arm.

The CIA also helped orchestrate a 1963 coup in Iraq, in which Qasim was finally shot and killed, after which Saddam Hussein returned to Iraq.  James Critchfield, who helped put the 1963 coup together, wrote:

it was the CIA's favorite coup: "We regarded it as a great victory," and "we had really crossed the Ts on what was happening."  "We came to power on a CIA train," said Ali Saleh Sa'adi, the Minister of the Interior of the new regime.  The CIA reportedly helped coordinate the entire effort from their station in Baghdad by using a radio station in Kuwait to communicate with rebels.

Saddam continued his relationship with the CIA until his invasion of Kuwait in 1990, for which he believed he had received the approval of the U.S. Government from  U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie.

 

Prime Minister of the Congo Patrice Lumumba — 1961

 

The CIA backed a 1961 coup in the Congo, in which its Prime Minister Patrice Lumumba was deposed and murdered. "By August of 1960, the White House, galvanized by Lumumba's turn to the Soviets, had authorized a secret C.I.A. scheme to 'replace the Lumumba Government by constitutional means,' whatever that meant.  The same month, at a Cabinet meeting, Eisenhower made comments that some interpreted as a call for assassination."

 

Apparently, the CIA leveraged its multitude of sources in Katanga to provide intelligence to Lumumba's enemies, making his capture possible. They helped to deliver him to the Katanga prison, where he was held before his execution.

 

President of the Dominican Republic Rafael Trujillo -- 1961

 

Also in 1961, the CIA provided the weapons used by rebels to assassinate the president of the Dominican Republic, Rafael Trujillo.  "President Dwight D. Eisenhower believed that Trujillo was just as bad as Castro, and if left alone he would turn the Dominican Republic into another bastion of communism in the Western Hemisphere.  Eisenhower ordered the CIA to mount a covert operation to help the anti-Trujillo elements in the country to overthrow the bothersome dictator."

 

Prime Minister/President of Cuba Fidel Castro — 1960's – 1990's

 

Perhaps most famously, the CIA tried and failed for years to kill Fidel Castro.  The CIA "acknowledged at least eight attempts to assassinate Castro during the Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson administrations in testimony to the US Senate — while [Castro's] own spy chief, Fabian Escalante, claims the number was over 600, up to and including the Clinton administration."  These plots included poisoning his ice cream and cigars, exploding cigars, rigging a seashell to explode near him when he was scuba diving, poisoning a diving suit, and leaflets advertising rewards to assassins.  The CIA worked with longtime Department of Defense and CIA clandestine operations and psychological warfare pioneer Edward Lansdale.

 

By many reports, including that of Colonel Fletcher Prouty, the same Edward Lansdale was photographed in Dealey Plaza on the day of the Kennedy Assassination.

 

President of South Vietnam Ngo Dinh Diem -- 1963

 

In 1963, the CIA helped organize a coup in South Vietnam, overthrowing the regime of Ngo Dinh Diem and his brother, Ngo Dinh Diem, who were killed in the coup.  "The first coup effort against Diem originated in August 1963, when CIA officer Colonel Lucien Conein met secretly with a number of high-ranking South Vietnamese military officers....  It was his job to act as an intermediary between the plotters and the U.S. embassy."  On November 2, 1963, "Diem and Nhu were tracked down and taken into custody by forces loyal to the plotters," and killed.

 

Chilean General René Schneider and President Salvador Allende — 1970-73

 

In October 1970, the CIA orchestrated the assassination of Chilean Commander-in-Chief René Schneider.  Unlike Allende, Schneider was not a communist, but he was unwilling to lead the military against a democratically elected leader.  Years later, declassified CIA files told the story:  

CIA Director Richard Helms convened his top aides to review the covert coup operations that had led to the attack.  "[I]t was agreed that … a maximum effort has been achieved," and that "the station has done excellent job of guiding Chileans to point today where a military solution is at least an option for them," stated a Secret cable of commendation transmitted that day to the CIA station in Chile.  "COS [Chief of Station] … and Station [deleted] are commended for accomplishing this under extremely difficult and delicate circumstances."

On September 11, 1973, elected Chilean president Salvador Allende shot himself in the burning presidential palace, under air attack from the Chilean military, in a CIA-sponsored coup.  "The U.S. government and its Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had worked for three years to foment a coup against Allende, who was regarded by the Nixon administration as a threat to democracy in Chile and Latin America.  Ironically, the democratically elected Allende was succeeded by the brutal dictator General Augusto Pinochet, who ruled over Chile with an iron fist for the next 17 years."

 

Lebanese Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah — 1985

 

In March 1985, the CIA tried to kill the Lebanese Shia leader Sheikh Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah, whose "position and outspoken political views made him a target."

CIA-trained operatives carried out an assassination attempt against him, in which a 440lb car bomb was placed along the short route between his apartment and mosque.  Fadlallah narrowly escaped the explosion, but 80 or so others, including many women and children, were killed and 200 injured when a nearby apartment block was demolished.  Bob Woodward, an American investigative journalist, linked the blast to the CIA, though US officials always denied any involvement.  In 2006, Israel bombed Fadlallah's house in south Beirut, but he was not there.

Lessons to be Learned

 

While the focus of this review is the assassination of JFK, the insightful comments of William Blum should be noted, explaining the high price paid by the United States as a result of this effort to manipulate world politics through assassinations:

The remarkable international goodwill and credibility enjoyed by the United States at the close of the Second World War was dissipated country-by-country, intervention-by-intervention.  [Emphasis added.]

Having plied and practiced and perfected their assassination tradecraft overseas, it certainly cannot be denied that the CIA had the means to assassinate John F. Kennedy in November 1963.  After all, as the CIA Assassination manual states:

Killing a political leader whose burgeoning career is a clear and present danger to the cause of freedom may be held necessary.  [Emphasis adde

Editor's Note: To read the articles in this series, please click here.

Divider
Happy Thanksgiving

LISTEN ON SPOTIFY: Now you can tune in every week on Spotify to America's Mondays With Mary and listen to our Executive Director Mary O'Neill's report on the comments and insights we receive from our fellow Americans to our weekly Reader's Survey. Listen and learn what's on their minds and in their hearts and get the latest news about America's Future activities and updates.

 

PEOPLE ARE TALKING: Thousands of our newsletter readers tell us that our articles are thought-provoking, increase their knowledge about the history and traditions of America, and keep them informed about the current state of affairs. If you missed one of our weekly newsletters or want to revisit a past edition, you can access them here.

SHOP TIL YOU STOP: We hope you love America's Future online shop display and ease of accessing your favorite items! There are many new products, including a full assortment of tees for the whole family, a wide range of accessories like coffee mugs and totes, and a special line dedicated to our Project Defend & Protect Our Children. Thank you for your support!

STAY CONNECTED: You'll find America's Future on your favorite social media platforms. Thank you for remembering to follow us and please share our posts.

CloutHubGettrFacebookTruth SocialRumble TelegramInstagramAmerica's Future
Divider

Support America's Future

America's Future is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization.
All donations are tax-deductible to the full extent of the law.

AMERICA'S FUTURE, INC. IS A FLORIDA NON PROFIT 501(C)(3) TAX-EXEMPT EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATION. ALL DONATIONS ARE TAX DEDUCTIBLE TO THE FULL EXTENT OF THE LAW. A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING TOLL-FREE, WITHIN THE STATE, 1-800-435-7352, OR VISITING WWW.FLORIDACONSUMERHELP.COM. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE. AMERICA'S FUTURE, INC.'S REGISTRATION NUMBER IS CH67839.


STATE DISCLOSURES

 

© 2025 AMERICA'S FUTURE, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Our Contact Information

America's Future

1181 S. Sumter Blvd, #412
North Port, FL 34287

941-876-8112

https://www.americasfuture.net/

 

Unsubscribe | Manage email preferences

America's Future




5 comments:

Anonymous said...

100 mph winds just came onshore to Grand Haven. Just northwest of GR. Winds of 80 mph for my area expected.

Probably my last message for a while

--GRA

Anonymous said...

Storm went through with 60 mph. Didn't lose power.

--GRA

Nicholas said...

Thank God or nature for that!

Anonymous said...

That's for sure,N.S. Many tornadoes south and east of GR. My cousin,about 2 miles east,lost power,but this was a line of storms that weakened slightly before hitting Grand Rapids. Very grateful.

--GRA

Anonymous said...

ANOTHER WHITE BITES THE DUST:"WALKING TALL" ACTOR,JOE DON BAKER WALKED OFF THE PLANET--A WEEK AGO--AT 89


(Variety)Joe Don Baker, an imposing character actor who left his mark on action films, Westerns and James Bond adventures, has died at 89. An obituary for the actor reveals he died on May 7 and is survived by a small group of friends.

Baker was born on February 12, 1936, and spent his early life in Texas, attending Groesbeck High School and North Texas State College. After serving for two years in the U.S. Army, Baker traveled to New York City to pursue a career in theater.


He eventually began a career in television with a small part in the 1965 Western “Iron Horse,” and soon started appearing in films, with an uncredited start in 1967’s “Cool Hand Luke.”

His most famous role was that of wrestler-turned-sheriff Buford Pusser in the 1973 film “Walking Tall.” Baker appeared in scores of projects as a character actor, including three different Bond films (1987’s “The Living Daylights,” 1995’s “GoldenEye” and 1997’s “Tomorrow Never Dies”) and box office hits including 1984’s “The Natural,” 1985’s “Fletch” and Martin Scorsese’s 1991 “Cape Fear” remake.

Other film roles included “Reality Bites,” “Mars Attacks!” and the TV movie “Poodle Springs.”

On TV, he appeared in the mini-series “Edge of Darkness,” had a recurring role in the series “In the Heat of the Night,” on the series “Eischeid” and guest-starred on shows including “Gunsmoke” and “Lancer.”

Baker retired in 2012. His work in the ensemble cast of his final film, 2012’s “Mud,” was awarded the Robert Altman Award at the Independent Spirit Awards.

Baker’s one marriage was to Marlo Baker in 1969 and lasted for 11 years but produced no children. Per the obituary, Baker is “survived by relations in his native Groesbeck, who will forever cherish his memory. He is mourned by a small but very close circle of friends who will miss him eternally.”

A funeral will be held on May 20 in Mission Hills, Calif.

GRA:Very good performer,Joe Don Baker made his presence felt in the movies he appeared in--back when movies were worth going to. Today,woke movie studios won't hire Whites with that quality anymore,they have to be unintrusive nothings with IQs of a turnip--or criminals that blacks can arrest or kill.

--GRA