Hindu serial killer, Mainak Sarkar
By Nicholas Stix
Some readers will recall that during the Nation of Islam D.C. Sniper murders in 2002, racist, black, Montgomery County Police Chief Charles Moose, who was put in charge of the manhunt solely because he was black, kept telling the public that the killer was a white man driving a white box truck. Moose had no reason to believe that, but he kept on lying to the public, even after he had had a long telephone conversation with one of the killers (who had called in), and thus knew that the killer was black.
The phony “description” was supposedly based on a “profile,” but “profilers,” “experts” like Robert K. Ressler, had been lying to the public for years, asserting that serial killers were overwhelmingly white men in their thirties and forties.
The killers kept on slaughtering people, most of them white, while Moose kept their identity secret.
Moose then tried to keep the public out of the investigation, and only used police radio band to communicate. However, a white trucker, who had a police scanner, heard the description of the old Chevy that John Allen Muhammad and Lee Malvo were traveling in, spotted the vehicle, called it in, and the killers were caught, not thanks to, but in spite of Charles Moose.
That was a long preamble to my question, regarding why the LAPD broadcast the description of the killer as a “six-foot-tall white male, dressed in black.”
Did someone at UCLA simply lie, out of racial and sexual hatred? Did someone at UCLA act out of opportunism? He saw a white man in the Engineering Building #4, and figured, ‘I’ll never get in trouble for fingering a privileged white male’?