Tuesday, July 29, 2014

GOP Colluded with Democrats, to Cover-Up “Obama’s” Ineligibility to Run for the Presidency



Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

Behind All the Scandals is a Lie So Big That It Could Utterly Destroy Obama
"In the age of Obama, we have witnessed the complete metamorphosis of the media..."
By Lawrence Sellin
July 22, 2014
Western Journalism

The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see – Ayn Rand

Many Americans believe that the US Government, the Democrat and Republican Parties, and the media are deliberately misleading the American people, hiding the most heinous fraud and Constitutional crisis in the history of the United States.

Individuals at the highest levels of the federal government may have aided and abetted a deception, which included willful ignorance, misinformation, false interpretations of the Constitution, outright lies, and the creation of fraudulent documents and computer records to protect an ineligible, ill-prepared ,and unworthy candidate for the office of President of the United States.

In the age of Obama, we have witnessed the complete metamorphosis of the media, no longer objective journalists but partisan liberal activists who control, manipulate, and even create news to support a left-wing political agenda.

On April 27, 2011, Barack Obama presented as his official birth certificate a digital image so riddled with anomalies that only counterfeiters or the complicit could vouch for its authenticity.

Evidence has been reported claiming that Barack Obama has been using a fraudulent Connecticut Social Security Number (SSN) since at least 1986. That number, 042-68-4425, issued in 1977, was set aside exclusively for Connecticut residents, a state in which he never lived nor did any member of his immediate family. In addition, SSN Verifier Plus showed the birth year 1890 linked to that number. Because SSNs are not re-issued, multiple birth dates for one card suggest a stolen number.

The data and documents associated with Obama’s Selective Service registration also contain inconsistencies. Most noticeably, Obama’s registration card has a two digit year ‘80″ on the postal stamp, unlike the four digit year stamp “1980″ found on all other registration cards completed at the same time in Hawaii and other states. It appears that a 2008 postal stamp was cut, the 08 inverted and reinserted into the stamp to mimic a 1980 registration. Interestingly, Obama’s SSN 042-68-4425 appears on his 1980 Selective Service registration, which is six years before that number can be found in personal background databases.

I believe that Barack Obama did not register with the Selective Service in 1980 because he was attending Occidental College with a foreign student status and in 1981 traveled to Pakistan using an Indonesian passport. According to the law, failure to register with the Selective Service would forever prevent Obama from working in the executive branch of the US government.

One could readily conclude that Obama lied and flouted the law to get elected. It should come as no surprise then, that he would lie and flout the law to implement his policies.

I believe Obama succeeded in 2008 because the Republicans struck a deal with the Democrats not to question Obama’s eligibility for office and his personal history. Furthermore, the liberal media took radical steps to protect their favored candidate, killing negative stories about Obama and even threatening to accuse his opponents of racism in order to make them “sputter with rage, which in turn leads to overreaction and self-destruction.”

In addition to the apparent creation of fraudulent documents and the doctoring of computer records by Obama supporters, then- Democratic National Chair Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) prepared two different Certifications of Nomination, an action unprecedented in US history, presumably to hide Obama’s ineligibility for office.

And so committed has the liberal media been to protect their investment in Obama, they continue to dispense with gusto misinformation, disinformation, or no information.

The conspiracy of silence continues out of complicity or fear. The political-media establishment realizes that if the truth is told about Barack Obama, the system from which they accrue enormous personal power and profit will collapse.

Republicans will oppose Obama; but they will not expose him because by doing so, it will reveal their own dereliction of duty. Many believe, and with reasonable cause, that all the hearings and lawsuits conducted by the Republicans are a subterfuge meant to run out the clock.

It doesn’t matter if Obama thinks he is right or if he thinks he is being virtuous. The policies he is pursuing are destroying the country. Even if one rejects treachery or treason as motives, the unrealistic and impractical far-left liberalism promoted by Obama and his acolytes is an inevitable march from altruistic dreams to coercion, oppression, and, ultimately, failure.

You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality – Ayn Rand


Anonymous said...

My guess is that Soros, Ted Kennedy, etc., saw Obama make his speech at the convention and decided this is the man and we go with him.

They had an enormous amount of energy and money and time already invested in the man and HAD NEVER CHECKED OUT HIS BACKGROUND BEFOREHAND.

When it was checked and found to be wanting, so much "water over the dam" had no turning back then.

So just tough it out and label anyone who protests as a "hater".

And the voters I guess it can be said have the final say. But they have been duped it seems and big time.

Anonymous said...

And how did this all start?

About one month before the election of 2008 someone in the camp of Obama questioned the eligibility of McCain to run.

And indeed there were some real legitimate questions that could be raised about the eligibility of McCain to run.

At that point Obama was then questioned about his eligibility and it was all down hill since that time.

The chickens did come home to roost.

Anonymous said...

That whole problem with the passport and travel to Indonesia was never settled to my understanding.

And who can blame for questioning the matter of the Hawaiian birth. After all, the jacket to the cover of the SECOND autobiography did say the man was born in Kenya.

Anonymous said...

I have often thought EVEN OBAMA might not know all the answers to all these questions. Perhaps the man himself was lied to and deceived by his family for all his years.

Harmless [so it seemed] gestures as telling the man he was natural born when he was not did not seem as a big deal. At least until he ran for President.

Anonymous said...

This raises questions as for precedent and the future. Eligibility will NEVER be an issue again because of Obama. Let it slide as has been done the case on this occasion?

smrstrauss said...

Re: "Anomalies."


Re the general idea that Obama was born in a foreign country:

For Obama to have been born in a foreign country:

(1) Obama’s relatives would have had to have been rich enough (and they weren’t. In 1961 Obama’s grandfather was a furniture salesman, and his grandmother was a low-level employee in a bank [she did not become a vice president until 1970], and his father went from Kenya to Hawaii on a free flight) and dumb enough to send their daughter at high risk of stillbirth to a foreign country to give birth—-—despite there being fine hospitals in Hawaii;

(2) Obama’s mother would have had to have traveled overseas ALONE (since WND has proven with a FOI Act request that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961) and somehow got Obama back to the USA without getting him entered on her US passport or getting a visa for him (which would have had to have been applied for in a US consulate in that country and the records would still exist);

(3) Obama’s relative would have had to have gotten the officials in Hawaii to record his birth in Hawaii despite (as birthers claim) his being born in another country and somehow got the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley to lie (and since the woman’s father’s name really was Stanley, Obama’s relatives would have had to have found one of the very few women in Hawaii with fathers of that name to do it).

(Oh, and there isn’t even proof that Obama’s mother had a passport in 1961, and very very few 18-year-olds did, and EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in 1961 because of the risk of stillbirths. Yet birther sites hope that a few GULLIBLE people will just assume that she was one of the few to have a passport and one of the extremely few women to travel abroad late in pregnancy, and that the birth certificate is forged and the officials of BOTH parties who have confirmed it and the Index Data and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers and the teacher who wrote home are all lying. )

E. Newton said...

One point and one question.

Obama's biological father was Frank Marshall Davis. Watch the movie Dreams from my Real Father. The physical similarities alone is proof.

Why would the Republicans conspire to hide his identity? It's one thing to make the allegation. The bigger story would be why.

smrstrauss said...

Re: "Obama's biological father was Frank Marshall Davis. Watch the movie Dreams from my Real Father. The physical similarities alone is proof."

Mitt Romney looks a lot like Harpo Marx. Does that mean that Harpo is his real father?

In other words, the similarity in face between two photos, doesn't prove a thing.

And, guess what, if Davis were Obama's real father, then---so what? (It has neither legal nor political effect.)

BTW, birthers have suggested first that Malcolm X was Obama's "real father," then Davis, then Subud, then Davis again.

Nicholas said...

For what it's worth, the only person whom the John Doe calling himself "Barack Obama" resembles is his late, white, maternal grandfather, Stanley Armour Dunham. The photograph of Dunham on the cover of Dreams from My Father looks as if "Obama" had donned a World War II U.S. Army Pacific Theater of Operations uniform. Since there was never any dispute as to maternity, that adds little to the conversation, except for when people claim "Obama" resembles Barack Obama or Frank Marshal Davis.

smrstrauss said...

Re: "Obama."

Obama's name is Obama. There isn't a shred of evidence that he ever had it legally changed, and there certainly is no evidence whatever that he was adopted in Indonesia (which takes the action of a district court, and no such court papers have ever been found).

Obama's legal name is therefore: Obama.