The Gang of Eight: In an America that hadn't lost her way, they'd be publicly hanged
Nation-rapist Patrick Leahy
Posted by Nicholas Stix
By Neil Munro
April 11, 2013, 2:24 p.m.
The Daily Caller
No Comments
The Senate’s pending immigration bill sets aside $3.5 billion for additional surveillance of the country’s southern border, or roughly $1.79 million per mile of the 1,954 mile border, according to leaked reports in The New York Times and other media.
But $3.5 billion is only a small portion of what opponents and advocates say would be needed to stop illegal immigrants from crossing the border to seek low-wage jobs in communities where many American families are already struggling to make a decent living.
The 1,500-page bill will provide conditional legalization to at least 11 million illegal immigrants. Initially, applicants would get work permits, but they would be allowed to get valuable green cards after five years, and then citizenship, if government officials declare the border is fully monitored and the illegal inflow through some portions has been cut by 90 percent.
The border regulation is said by advocates for large-scale immigration to be a “trigger” that has to be met before illegals get to become citizens.
The bill ensures there is “no ability to earn citizenship for at least 13 years after bill is enacted, AND border security and interior enforcement is in place,” said an April 11 tweet from Cesar Conda, chief of staff for Sen. Marco Rubio.
Homeland Security may receive $2 billion in additional funding after five years, if the surveillance and enforcement goals are not met.
The bill is set for release by early next week, after months of back-room negotiations.
But immigration-reformers say the vague language used by the bill’s advocates — “monitored” for example — will make real security impossible in the face of political and courtroom opposition from wealthy immigrant, business and progressive lobbies.
“It seems that they are planning to make a few cosmetic improvements at the border just so they can get to the legalization phase,” according to Ira Mehlman, a spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform.
“The triggers are nothing but fig leaves to dupe gullible Republicans,” according to Mark Krikorian, the director of the Center for Immigration Studies.
Krikorian favors a stronger enforcement trigger, such as the withholding of benefits until workplace data shows that multiple security procedures are working. Without such a trigger, there is little to stop politicians from providing the benefits of legalization to at least 11 million illegal immigrants and to many employers of low-wage labor, say critics.
The failure of the so-called trigger would leave the public with the problems and costs of legalization and of continued illegal immigration, say Krikorian and other critics. “Based on the reports I have seen about what is in the bill, the … border security goals will have no effect on the next stages of amnesty — green cards and citizenship,” said Mehlman.
Since 1990, workplace competition from legal and illegal immigrants cut wages for lower-skilled Americans by roughly $402 billion per year, according to a recent analysis by George Borjas, a Harvard labor economist.
The allocation of only $3.5 billion may make the border monitoring task financially impossible too.
In January 2011, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano canceled a much-touted high-tech surveillance system, dubbed the Secure Border Initiative. The system cost $1 billion, yet it sought to guard only 53 miles, or two percent of the border.
The cost of maintaining a complete border fence for 25 years will cost from $300 million to $1.7 billion per mile, depending on materials, a nonpartisan group, Taxpayers for Common Sense, claimed in 2008.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, the leading GOP proponent of the legalization and guest-worker bill, has told interviewers that he wants a border security system that stops 90 percent of illegal immigrants.
“I want to complete the fencing that makes sense, and I want to spend more money on technology that hasn’t been implemented yet,” he told radio host Sean Hannity April 9.
However, Graham did not explain if “fencing that makes sense” actually means fencing along the full length of the border.
Graham also told Hannity that unmanned aircraft are needed to patrol the border.
Six are already operating, but “we need about 12 more,” he told Hannity.
However, with only 18 drones, roughly six could be kept in the air simultaneously. That would mean one operational drone for every 300 miles of the border.
Graham did not say if the billions amount would be added to current spending.
Graham also told Hannity that the bill will require all companies to use the E-Verify network to confirm job applicants’ have work permits.
“That has to be up and running and in place before you do the pathway to citizenship,” he said.
Media reports say the E-Verify system won’t be mandatory until five years after the bill is signed, even though it is already being used by by [sic] many companies to check roughly one-third of all job applicants.
In California, a 14-mile stretch of fending [sic] blocked an annual inflow of half a million illegal immigrants, according to a report posted by the Center or [sic] Immigration Studies.
“Border Patrol apprehensions in the San Diego sector prior to Operation Gatekeeper surpassed 500,000 a year … [but] construction of double and triple fencing, enhanced by lights and patrol roads, has reduced illegal entries in that sector to a trickle,” said the December 2011 report by Center for Immigration Studies.
“A 2,000 mile state-of-the-art border fence has been estimated to cost between four and eight billion dollars,” according to one advocacy group, Let Freedom Ring.
Under the pending bill, GOP politicians would accept a multi-stage amnesty for at least 11 million illegal immigrants. The legalization would provide Democratic candidates with a large pool of new Democratic-leaning Latino voters in roughly 15 years.
In exchange, Graham said April 7 that GOP politicians expect Democratic politicians to accept an increased inflow of low-wage, foreign visa-workers. The pending bill would raise the annual number of seasonal and permanent visa-workers from today’s level of 690,000 to 1 million or more.
“If we’re reasonable with 11 million, if we all give them a pathway to citizenship … then the Democratic Party has to give us the guest worker program to help our economy,” Graham told ABC April 7.
No comments:
Post a Comment